安全机器学习领域的研究概况

George J. Siedel, Stefan Voß, S. Vock
{"title":"安全机器学习领域的研究概况","authors":"George J. Siedel, Stefan Voß, S. Vock","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-69390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The applicability of ML components in safety-critical systems will significantly depend on whether it will be possible to provide a comprehensive proof of their safety. Three research questions (RQ) are answered in order to provide a starting point for future activities towards the risk assessment of safety-critical systems containing ML components. First, special emphasis was placed on the design of a literature search strategy in order to enable quantitative insights into a representative set of publications (RQ1). Taxonomy analysis, bibliographic data visualization and compiled findings of reviews were therefore combined. A categorization of identified methods towards improving, ensuring and assessing safe machine learning was developed (RQ2). Then, a comparison was made with those methods for safety-critical software that are recommended by the functional safety standard IEC 61508 (RQ3). The comparison and quantification of research activity revealed imbalances within separate research areas. The conclusion is drawn that for the safety assessment of ML systems a comprehensive toolbox of combined methods needs to be converged from procedures within existing safety standards and the broad spectrum of methods proposed by current scientific publications.","PeriodicalId":146533,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Overview of the Research Landscape in the Field of Safe Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"George J. Siedel, Stefan Voß, S. Vock\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-69390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The applicability of ML components in safety-critical systems will significantly depend on whether it will be possible to provide a comprehensive proof of their safety. Three research questions (RQ) are answered in order to provide a starting point for future activities towards the risk assessment of safety-critical systems containing ML components. First, special emphasis was placed on the design of a literature search strategy in order to enable quantitative insights into a representative set of publications (RQ1). Taxonomy analysis, bibliographic data visualization and compiled findings of reviews were therefore combined. A categorization of identified methods towards improving, ensuring and assessing safe machine learning was developed (RQ2). Then, a comparison was made with those methods for safety-critical software that are recommended by the functional safety standard IEC 61508 (RQ3). The comparison and quantification of research activity revealed imbalances within separate research areas. The conclusion is drawn that for the safety assessment of ML systems a comprehensive toolbox of combined methods needs to be converged from procedures within existing safety standards and the broad spectrum of methods proposed by current scientific publications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

机器学习组件在安全关键系统中的适用性将在很大程度上取决于是否有可能提供其安全性的全面证明。回答了三个研究问题(RQ),以便为包含ML组件的安全关键系统的风险评估的未来活动提供起点。首先,特别强调了文献检索策略的设计,以便能够对具有代表性的一组出版物(RQ1)进行定量分析。因此,分类分析、书目数据可视化和综述汇编结果相结合。对改进、确保和评估安全机器学习的确定方法进行了分类(RQ2)。然后,与功能安全标准IEC 61508 (RQ3)推荐的安全关键软件的方法进行了比较。研究活动的比较和量化揭示了不同研究领域内的不平衡。得出的结论是,对于ML系统的安全评估,需要从现有安全标准的程序和当前科学出版物提出的广泛方法中融合一个综合方法工具箱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Overview of the Research Landscape in the Field of Safe Machine Learning
The applicability of ML components in safety-critical systems will significantly depend on whether it will be possible to provide a comprehensive proof of their safety. Three research questions (RQ) are answered in order to provide a starting point for future activities towards the risk assessment of safety-critical systems containing ML components. First, special emphasis was placed on the design of a literature search strategy in order to enable quantitative insights into a representative set of publications (RQ1). Taxonomy analysis, bibliographic data visualization and compiled findings of reviews were therefore combined. A categorization of identified methods towards improving, ensuring and assessing safe machine learning was developed (RQ2). Then, a comparison was made with those methods for safety-critical software that are recommended by the functional safety standard IEC 61508 (RQ3). The comparison and quantification of research activity revealed imbalances within separate research areas. The conclusion is drawn that for the safety assessment of ML systems a comprehensive toolbox of combined methods needs to be converged from procedures within existing safety standards and the broad spectrum of methods proposed by current scientific publications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Prediction Software to Evaluate Frisbee Movement An Imperfect Usage-Based Preventive Maintenance Planning Model for Railway Track Superstructures Development of Algorithms for Improving Fiber-Optical Rail Circuit on Railway Spans Design, Modeling, and Fabrication of a Ventilator Prototype - A Successful Student Project Story An Overview of the Research Landscape in the Field of Safe Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1