集群中的多目标就业安置

S. Blagodurov, Alexandra Fedorova, Evgeny Vinnik, Tyler Dwyer, Fabien Hermenier
{"title":"集群中的多目标就业安置","authors":"S. Blagodurov, Alexandra Fedorova, Evgeny Vinnik, Tyler Dwyer, Fabien Hermenier","doi":"10.1145/2807591.2807636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key decisions made by both MapReduce and HPC cluster management frameworks is the placement of jobs within a cluster. To make this decision, they consider factors like resource constraints within a node or the proximity of data to a process. However, they fail to account for the degree of collocation on the cluster's nodes. A tight process placement can create contention for the intra-node shared resources, such as shared caches, memory, disk, or network bandwidth. A loose placement would create less contention, but exacerbate network delays and increase cluster-wide power consumption. Finding the best job placement is challenging, because among many possible placements, we need to find one that gives us an acceptable trade-off between performance and power consumption. We propose to tackle the problem via multi-objective optimization. Our solution is able to balance conflicting objectives specified by the user and efficiently find a suitable job placement.","PeriodicalId":117494,"journal":{"name":"SC15: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-objective job placement in clusters\",\"authors\":\"S. Blagodurov, Alexandra Fedorova, Evgeny Vinnik, Tyler Dwyer, Fabien Hermenier\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2807591.2807636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the key decisions made by both MapReduce and HPC cluster management frameworks is the placement of jobs within a cluster. To make this decision, they consider factors like resource constraints within a node or the proximity of data to a process. However, they fail to account for the degree of collocation on the cluster's nodes. A tight process placement can create contention for the intra-node shared resources, such as shared caches, memory, disk, or network bandwidth. A loose placement would create less contention, but exacerbate network delays and increase cluster-wide power consumption. Finding the best job placement is challenging, because among many possible placements, we need to find one that gives us an acceptable trade-off between performance and power consumption. We propose to tackle the problem via multi-objective optimization. Our solution is able to balance conflicting objectives specified by the user and efficiently find a suitable job placement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SC15: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"195 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SC15: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2807591.2807636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SC15: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2807591.2807636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

MapReduce和HPC集群管理框架所做的关键决策之一是在集群内放置作业。为了做出这个决定,他们会考虑节点内的资源约束或数据与流程的接近程度等因素。然而,它们没有考虑到集群节点上的搭配程度。紧凑的进程布局可能会导致对节点内部共享资源(如共享缓存、内存、磁盘或网络带宽)的争用。松散的布局会减少争用,但会加剧网络延迟并增加集群范围内的功耗。找到最佳的工作位置是具有挑战性的,因为在许多可能的位置中,我们需要找到一个在性能和功耗之间可以接受的平衡。我们提出通过多目标优化来解决这一问题。我们的解决方案能够平衡用户指定的冲突目标,并有效地找到合适的工作安置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-objective job placement in clusters
One of the key decisions made by both MapReduce and HPC cluster management frameworks is the placement of jobs within a cluster. To make this decision, they consider factors like resource constraints within a node or the proximity of data to a process. However, they fail to account for the degree of collocation on the cluster's nodes. A tight process placement can create contention for the intra-node shared resources, such as shared caches, memory, disk, or network bandwidth. A loose placement would create less contention, but exacerbate network delays and increase cluster-wide power consumption. Finding the best job placement is challenging, because among many possible placements, we need to find one that gives us an acceptable trade-off between performance and power consumption. We propose to tackle the problem via multi-objective optimization. Our solution is able to balance conflicting objectives specified by the user and efficiently find a suitable job placement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal scheduling of in-situ analysis for large-scale scientific simulations Monetary cost optimizations for MPI-based HPC applications on Amazon clouds: checkpoints and replicated execution IOrchestra: supporting high-performance data-intensive applications in the cloud via collaborative virtualization An input-adaptive and in-place approach to dense tensor-times-matrix multiply Scalable sparse tensor decompositions in distributed memory systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1