{"title":"大屠杀文学中时间与记忆的表现:夏洛特·德尔博的《日子与记忆》与艾达·芬克的《故事选集》比较","authors":"A. Pokhrel","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL2009484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent Holocaust testimonies are often disruptive narration of personal histories. In the form of memory, these testimonies capture survivors' experience of the Nazi Holocaust. As the survivor recalls his or her past experience in the present, \"'[c]otemporality' becomes the controlling principle of these testimonies, as witnesses struggle with the impossible task of making their recollections of the camp experience coalesce with the rest of their lives.\" (1) The sense of time is deeply embedded in the survivor's consciousness. Caught between the transitions of past and present, the survivor becomes traumatized by his or her own anguish and the anguish of others. Hence, in these testimonies, the psychological association of events becomes more important than the chronological order of events. Original in its narrative technique and use of memory and time, Charlotte Delbo's posthumous memoir La memoire et les jours (translated as Days and Memory, 1985), is a complex reflection of the atrocious past. Auschwitz is fresh in Delbo's memory, and its horrifying images permeate her being in the present. So the present moment is not a simple point, but it has a certain extension and inner structure of its own. German philosopher Martin Heidegger has said that the reality of time is constructed not as something which we encounter only when we attempt to reckon it but as something which becomes operational within human existence. Similarly, Ida Fink, in her short stories \"A Scrap of Time,\" \"A Second Scrap of Time,\" and \"Traces\" (published in her anthologies Traces and A Scrap of Time and Other Stories), excavates the \"ruins of memory\" that invoke the devastating experiences of the Nazi Holocaust, which cannot be \"measured in months and years\" but can only be measured psychologically. (2) Interestingly enough, both Delbo and Fink focus on the intricate relations of past and present. In this respect, the principal question pertaining to this study would be: How are memory and time used in Delbo's memoir and Fink's stories in representing the Holocaust? Although Delbo and Fink both make use of memory and time in narrating the inhuman conditions of ghettoization, deportation, forced labor, roundups, and mass execution, their ways of representation vary significantly. Memory and time are used in Delbo to show the timelessness in complex layers of memory and to recreate a reality through inventive narrative style while in Fink they are used to delineate the scraps of time in the ruins of memory and to create a tragic domestic reality through conventional narrativity. Charlotte Delbo and Ida Fink both write in the present looking back at the past moments. Delbo writes from the cafe in France after many years of camp life, whereas Fink writes from Israel after many years of ghetto life. Both find their present self inextricably linked to the past self. Despite their recognition of the importance of remembering, Delbo and Fink both encounter a problem in conveying their experience and knowledge as a coherent historical truth to others. However, most importantly, the temporal experience Delbo had in the Auschwitz camp differed remarkably from Fink's experience in the ghetto. Auschwitz had no clock at all. The only time Delbo experienced in the camp was human time. Unlike Delbo, Fink might have better sense of clock-time in the ghetto. The nature of atrocity and other circumstances might have also varied. Here one is tempted to think that different situations in the camp and ghetto could be one of the major reasons why their perception of time and memory also differed. Before examining Delbo's Days and Memory and Fink's selected stories, I will briefly examine a few important theoretical positions in memory and time, especially in their relation to Holocaust literature. Stressing the importance of memory in the testimonies, noted scholar Lawrence L. Langer, in his Holocaust Testimonies: The Ruins of Memory, states: \"Testimony is a form of remembering. …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representations of Time and Memory in Holocaust Literature: A Comparison of Charlotte Delbo’s Days and Memory and Ida Fink’s Selected Stories\",\"authors\":\"A. Pokhrel\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL2009484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent Holocaust testimonies are often disruptive narration of personal histories. In the form of memory, these testimonies capture survivors' experience of the Nazi Holocaust. As the survivor recalls his or her past experience in the present, \\\"'[c]otemporality' becomes the controlling principle of these testimonies, as witnesses struggle with the impossible task of making their recollections of the camp experience coalesce with the rest of their lives.\\\" (1) The sense of time is deeply embedded in the survivor's consciousness. Caught between the transitions of past and present, the survivor becomes traumatized by his or her own anguish and the anguish of others. Hence, in these testimonies, the psychological association of events becomes more important than the chronological order of events. Original in its narrative technique and use of memory and time, Charlotte Delbo's posthumous memoir La memoire et les jours (translated as Days and Memory, 1985), is a complex reflection of the atrocious past. Auschwitz is fresh in Delbo's memory, and its horrifying images permeate her being in the present. So the present moment is not a simple point, but it has a certain extension and inner structure of its own. German philosopher Martin Heidegger has said that the reality of time is constructed not as something which we encounter only when we attempt to reckon it but as something which becomes operational within human existence. Similarly, Ida Fink, in her short stories \\\"A Scrap of Time,\\\" \\\"A Second Scrap of Time,\\\" and \\\"Traces\\\" (published in her anthologies Traces and A Scrap of Time and Other Stories), excavates the \\\"ruins of memory\\\" that invoke the devastating experiences of the Nazi Holocaust, which cannot be \\\"measured in months and years\\\" but can only be measured psychologically. (2) Interestingly enough, both Delbo and Fink focus on the intricate relations of past and present. In this respect, the principal question pertaining to this study would be: How are memory and time used in Delbo's memoir and Fink's stories in representing the Holocaust? Although Delbo and Fink both make use of memory and time in narrating the inhuman conditions of ghettoization, deportation, forced labor, roundups, and mass execution, their ways of representation vary significantly. Memory and time are used in Delbo to show the timelessness in complex layers of memory and to recreate a reality through inventive narrative style while in Fink they are used to delineate the scraps of time in the ruins of memory and to create a tragic domestic reality through conventional narrativity. Charlotte Delbo and Ida Fink both write in the present looking back at the past moments. Delbo writes from the cafe in France after many years of camp life, whereas Fink writes from Israel after many years of ghetto life. Both find their present self inextricably linked to the past self. Despite their recognition of the importance of remembering, Delbo and Fink both encounter a problem in conveying their experience and knowledge as a coherent historical truth to others. However, most importantly, the temporal experience Delbo had in the Auschwitz camp differed remarkably from Fink's experience in the ghetto. Auschwitz had no clock at all. The only time Delbo experienced in the camp was human time. Unlike Delbo, Fink might have better sense of clock-time in the ghetto. The nature of atrocity and other circumstances might have also varied. Here one is tempted to think that different situations in the camp and ghetto could be one of the major reasons why their perception of time and memory also differed. Before examining Delbo's Days and Memory and Fink's selected stories, I will briefly examine a few important theoretical positions in memory and time, especially in their relation to Holocaust literature. Stressing the importance of memory in the testimonies, noted scholar Lawrence L. Langer, in his Holocaust Testimonies: The Ruins of Memory, states: \\\"Testimony is a form of remembering. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":288505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL2009484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL2009484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
最近的大屠杀证词往往是对个人历史的破坏性叙述。这些证词以记忆的形式记录了幸存者对纳粹大屠杀的经历。当幸存者回忆起他或她现在的过去经历时,“‘暂时性’成为这些证词的控制原则,因为证人努力完成不可能完成的任务,使他们对集中营经历的回忆与他们生活的其余部分结合起来。”时间观念深深植根于幸存者的意识中。在过去和现在的过渡之间,幸存者因自己和他人的痛苦而受到创伤。因此,在这些证词中,事件的心理联系变得比事件的时间顺序更重要。夏洛特·德尔博的遗作《La memoire et les jours》(翻译为《日子与记忆》,1985年)在叙事技巧和对记忆和时间的运用上具有独创性,是对残暴过去的复杂反映。奥斯维辛在德尔博的记忆中是鲜活的,它的恐怖形象渗透在她现在的生活中。所以当下时刻不是一个简单的点,而是有一定的外延和自身的内在结构。德国哲学家马丁·海德格尔曾说过,时间的实在性不是我们在试图计算它时才遇到的东西,而是在人类存在中成为可操作的东西。同样,艾达·芬克(Ida Fink)在她的短篇小说《一小段时间》(A fragment of Time)、《第二段时间》(A Second fragment of Time)和《痕迹》(Traces)(发表在她的选集《痕迹》、《一小段时间》和《其他故事》中)中,挖掘了“记忆的废墟”,唤起了纳粹大屠杀的毁灭性经历,这些经历不能“用月和年来衡量”,只能从心理上衡量。(2)有趣的是,Delbo和Fink都关注过去和现在的复杂关系。在这方面,与这项研究有关的主要问题是:德尔博的回忆录和芬克的故事如何利用记忆和时间来代表大屠杀?尽管德尔博和芬克都利用记忆和时间来叙述种族隔离、驱逐、强迫劳动、围捕和大规模处决等不人道的条件,但他们的表现方式却大相径庭。在Delbo中,记忆和时间被用来在复杂的记忆层中表现出永恒,并通过创造性的叙事风格重新创造现实,而在Fink中,它们被用来描绘记忆废墟中的时间碎片,并通过传统叙事创造出悲惨的国内现实。夏洛特·德尔博和艾达·芬克都写在现在,回顾过去的时刻。德尔博在法国的咖啡馆里写了多年的集中营生活,而芬克在以色列写了多年的贫民窟生活。他们都发现现在的自己与过去的自己有着千丝万缕的联系。尽管德尔博和芬克认识到记忆的重要性,但他们都遇到了一个问题,即如何将他们的经验和知识作为连贯的历史真相传达给他人。然而,最重要的是,德尔博在奥斯维辛集中营的短暂经历与芬克在犹太人区的经历有很大不同。奥斯威辛根本没有时钟。德尔博在集中营里经历的唯一时间就是人类的时间。不像德尔博,芬克在贫民区可能对时间有更好的感觉。暴行的性质和其他情况也可能有所不同。在这里,人们不禁会想,集中营和隔都的不同情况可能是他们对时间和记忆的感知也不同的主要原因之一。在研究德尔博的《日子与记忆》和芬克精选的故事之前,我将简要地研究记忆和时间的一些重要理论立场,特别是它们与大屠杀文学的关系。著名学者劳伦斯·兰格在他的《大屠杀证词:记忆的废墟》中强调了证词中记忆的重要性,他说:“证词是一种记忆的形式。…
Representations of Time and Memory in Holocaust Literature: A Comparison of Charlotte Delbo’s Days and Memory and Ida Fink’s Selected Stories
The recent Holocaust testimonies are often disruptive narration of personal histories. In the form of memory, these testimonies capture survivors' experience of the Nazi Holocaust. As the survivor recalls his or her past experience in the present, "'[c]otemporality' becomes the controlling principle of these testimonies, as witnesses struggle with the impossible task of making their recollections of the camp experience coalesce with the rest of their lives." (1) The sense of time is deeply embedded in the survivor's consciousness. Caught between the transitions of past and present, the survivor becomes traumatized by his or her own anguish and the anguish of others. Hence, in these testimonies, the psychological association of events becomes more important than the chronological order of events. Original in its narrative technique and use of memory and time, Charlotte Delbo's posthumous memoir La memoire et les jours (translated as Days and Memory, 1985), is a complex reflection of the atrocious past. Auschwitz is fresh in Delbo's memory, and its horrifying images permeate her being in the present. So the present moment is not a simple point, but it has a certain extension and inner structure of its own. German philosopher Martin Heidegger has said that the reality of time is constructed not as something which we encounter only when we attempt to reckon it but as something which becomes operational within human existence. Similarly, Ida Fink, in her short stories "A Scrap of Time," "A Second Scrap of Time," and "Traces" (published in her anthologies Traces and A Scrap of Time and Other Stories), excavates the "ruins of memory" that invoke the devastating experiences of the Nazi Holocaust, which cannot be "measured in months and years" but can only be measured psychologically. (2) Interestingly enough, both Delbo and Fink focus on the intricate relations of past and present. In this respect, the principal question pertaining to this study would be: How are memory and time used in Delbo's memoir and Fink's stories in representing the Holocaust? Although Delbo and Fink both make use of memory and time in narrating the inhuman conditions of ghettoization, deportation, forced labor, roundups, and mass execution, their ways of representation vary significantly. Memory and time are used in Delbo to show the timelessness in complex layers of memory and to recreate a reality through inventive narrative style while in Fink they are used to delineate the scraps of time in the ruins of memory and to create a tragic domestic reality through conventional narrativity. Charlotte Delbo and Ida Fink both write in the present looking back at the past moments. Delbo writes from the cafe in France after many years of camp life, whereas Fink writes from Israel after many years of ghetto life. Both find their present self inextricably linked to the past self. Despite their recognition of the importance of remembering, Delbo and Fink both encounter a problem in conveying their experience and knowledge as a coherent historical truth to others. However, most importantly, the temporal experience Delbo had in the Auschwitz camp differed remarkably from Fink's experience in the ghetto. Auschwitz had no clock at all. The only time Delbo experienced in the camp was human time. Unlike Delbo, Fink might have better sense of clock-time in the ghetto. The nature of atrocity and other circumstances might have also varied. Here one is tempted to think that different situations in the camp and ghetto could be one of the major reasons why their perception of time and memory also differed. Before examining Delbo's Days and Memory and Fink's selected stories, I will briefly examine a few important theoretical positions in memory and time, especially in their relation to Holocaust literature. Stressing the importance of memory in the testimonies, noted scholar Lawrence L. Langer, in his Holocaust Testimonies: The Ruins of Memory, states: "Testimony is a form of remembering. …