设计师对定时闭包的看法

G. Ford
{"title":"设计师对定时闭包的看法","authors":"G. Ford","doi":"10.1145/2872334.2872339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technology nodes advance and designs become more complex, EDA developers strive to provide new and better solutions to the traditional problems encountered in back-end implementation. The usefulness of these EDA solutions is dependent on acceptance by designers, who often have different goals than developers. This presentation will offer a designer's perspective on current EDA solutions, with a focus on timing closure. Topics will include automated floorplanning goals, clock tree structure tradeoffs, data net repowering challenges and hold padding strategies. Examples from design experience will be used to illustrate where current EDA solutions work well, and what the obstacles are in cases where they do not.","PeriodicalId":272036,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 on International Symposium on Physical Design","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Designer's Perspective on Timing Closure\",\"authors\":\"G. Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2872334.2872339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As technology nodes advance and designs become more complex, EDA developers strive to provide new and better solutions to the traditional problems encountered in back-end implementation. The usefulness of these EDA solutions is dependent on acceptance by designers, who often have different goals than developers. This presentation will offer a designer's perspective on current EDA solutions, with a focus on timing closure. Topics will include automated floorplanning goals, clock tree structure tradeoffs, data net repowering challenges and hold padding strategies. Examples from design experience will be used to illustrate where current EDA solutions work well, and what the obstacles are in cases where they do not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 on International Symposium on Physical Design\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 on International Symposium on Physical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2872334.2872339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 on International Symposium on Physical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2872334.2872339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术节点的进步和设计变得越来越复杂,EDA开发人员努力为后端实现中遇到的传统问题提供新的、更好的解决方案。这些EDA解决方案的有用性取决于设计人员的接受程度,而设计人员的目标通常与开发人员不同。本演讲将提供设计师对当前EDA解决方案的看法,重点是时序关闭。主题将包括自动化地板规划目标,时钟树结构权衡,数据网络重新供电挑战和持有填充策略。将使用设计经验中的例子来说明当前的EDA解决方案在哪些地方工作得很好,以及在它们不工作的情况下存在哪些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Designer's Perspective on Timing Closure
As technology nodes advance and designs become more complex, EDA developers strive to provide new and better solutions to the traditional problems encountered in back-end implementation. The usefulness of these EDA solutions is dependent on acceptance by designers, who often have different goals than developers. This presentation will offer a designer's perspective on current EDA solutions, with a focus on timing closure. Topics will include automated floorplanning goals, clock tree structure tradeoffs, data net repowering challenges and hold padding strategies. Examples from design experience will be used to illustrate where current EDA solutions work well, and what the obstacles are in cases where they do not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Routability-Driven FPGA Placement Contest Proceedings of the 2016 on International Symposium on Physical Design Scaling Up Physical Design: Challenges and Opportunities Trailblazing Physical Design Flows: Ralph Otten's Impact on Design Automation Session details: 3D Circuits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1