J. Borghouts, Duncan P. Brumby, A. Cox
{"title":"TimeToFocus","authors":"J. Borghouts, Duncan P. Brumby, A. Cox","doi":"10.1145/3396044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many computer tasks involve looking up information from different sources, and these self-interruptions can be disruptive. In this article, we investigate whether giving people feedback on how long they are away from their task influences their self-interruption behaviour. We conducted a contextual inquiry on self-interruption behaviour in an office workplace. Participants were observed to postpone physical interruptions until a convenient moment in the task if they were expected to take time. In contrast, observations revealed that digital interruptions were addressed immediately; participants reported these were presumed to be quick to deal with. To increase awareness of time spent on digital interruptions, we developed TimeToFocus, a notification tool showing people the duration of their interruptions while working on a task. A field study deployment of TimeToFocus in an office workplace found that feedback on the duration of interruptions made participants reflect on what they were doing during interruptions. They reported that they used this insight to avoid task-irrelevant activities. To confirm whether participants’ perceptions of the benefit of the tool could be measured, we conducted an online experiment, where participants had to retrieve information from an email sent to their personal email addresses and enter it into a spreadsheet. Participants who used our tool made shorter interruptions, completed the spreadsheet task faster and made fewer data entry errors. We conclude that feedback on the length of interruptions can assist users in focusing on their primary task and thus improve productivity.","PeriodicalId":322583,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

许多计算机任务涉及从不同来源查找信息,而这些自我中断可能是破坏性的。在这篇文章中,我们调查了给人们反馈他们离开任务的时间是否会影响他们的自我干扰行为。我们对办公室工作场所的自我打断行为进行了语境调查。研究人员观察到,如果期望参与者花时间完成任务,他们会将物理干扰推迟到方便的时刻。相比之下,观察显示,数字干扰立即得到解决;参与者报告说,这些问题被认为很快就能解决。为了提高人们对花在数字干扰上的时间的意识,我们开发了TimeToFocus,这是一个通知工具,向人们展示他们在工作时被干扰的持续时间。TimeToFocus在办公室工作场所进行的一项实地研究发现,关于打断时间长短的反馈会让参与者反思他们在被打断期间正在做什么。他们报告说,他们利用这种洞察力来避免与任务无关的活动。为了确认参与者对该工具的好处的看法是否可以衡量,我们进行了一个在线实验,参与者必须从发送到他们个人电子邮件地址的电子邮件中检索信息,并将其输入电子表格。使用我们工具的参与者中断的时间更短,完成电子表格任务的速度更快,数据输入错误也更少。我们的结论是,关于中断时间长短的反馈可以帮助用户专注于他们的主要任务,从而提高工作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TimeToFocus
Many computer tasks involve looking up information from different sources, and these self-interruptions can be disruptive. In this article, we investigate whether giving people feedback on how long they are away from their task influences their self-interruption behaviour. We conducted a contextual inquiry on self-interruption behaviour in an office workplace. Participants were observed to postpone physical interruptions until a convenient moment in the task if they were expected to take time. In contrast, observations revealed that digital interruptions were addressed immediately; participants reported these were presumed to be quick to deal with. To increase awareness of time spent on digital interruptions, we developed TimeToFocus, a notification tool showing people the duration of their interruptions while working on a task. A field study deployment of TimeToFocus in an office workplace found that feedback on the duration of interruptions made participants reflect on what they were doing during interruptions. They reported that they used this insight to avoid task-irrelevant activities. To confirm whether participants’ perceptions of the benefit of the tool could be measured, we conducted an online experiment, where participants had to retrieve information from an email sent to their personal email addresses and enter it into a spreadsheet. Participants who used our tool made shorter interruptions, completed the spreadsheet task faster and made fewer data entry errors. We conclude that feedback on the length of interruptions can assist users in focusing on their primary task and thus improve productivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing PairBuddy—A Conversational Agent for Pair Programming Iteratively Designing Gesture Vocabularies: A Survey and Analysis of Best Practices in the HCI Literature Understanding HCI Practices and Challenges of Experiment Reporting with Brain Signals: Towards Reproducibility and Reuse Understanding, Addressing, and Analysing Digital Eye Strain in Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays It’s Complicated: The Relationship between User Trust, Model Accuracy and Explanations in AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1