基于著作权法的艺术家对艺术品真实性认定的异议——以艺术家否认案件为中心

Yunsoo Kim
{"title":"基于著作权法的艺术家对艺术品真实性认定的异议——以艺术家否认案件为中心","authors":"Yunsoo Kim","doi":"10.30582/kdps.2022.35.4.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cases that the artists denied the works which were known to be their own works (i. e. forgery cases) have been raised for a long time. Also, there were cases that the artist voluntarily acknowledged a forgery as the authentic work of the artist. There are various reasons why artists carry through their arguments that contradict the facts and court’s decision of the authenticity of the artwork in issue; to defend the artist's own social honor or subjective honor, or to strongly express the artist’s favor on the usage or ownership of the work, or due to some other interest matters related the work, etc. There are two types of artists’ disavowal; (1) the artist’s denial of the fact that the artist oneself created the work (i.e. usually meaning the 'forgery'); (2) the artist’s announcement that the artwork is no longer his or her work based on some incidents (damage, alteration of the work, or consumption and usage of the work that the artist did not want, etc.) to prevent further attribution of the artist’s name on the work or transaction of the work. When the dispute over the forgery of a work or the legality of an artist’s disavowal of a work rises, the artwork’s price in the market might go extremely unstable or it could be excluded from the auction. Moreover, not only the author but also the various parties such as the dealer, gallery owner, collector, or owner of the artwork can file lawsuits involving diverse issues like infringement of the artist’s right to attribution or right to integrity, or breach of contract issues, etc. The court reviews the claims of the parties, expert opinions, and the evidence of facts relevant to the work. Factual evidence of the art transaction and the artist’s history tends to play a great role in the court’s decision. However, if the parties continue to adhere to their stance despite the authentication results or the court decision, it causes various problems in the art market. This paper tries to find a way to protect both the freedom of trade and the safety of trade while respecting the various parties’ interests, the opinions of the art professionals, and the decision of the judiciary. In addition, this paper covers the methods of attributing the author and indicating artwork’s information during controversies, and ideas for drafting the contract and legal documents for such cases.","PeriodicalId":350441,"journal":{"name":"Korea Copyright Commission","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion based on the Copyright Law about When the Artist Controverts the Decision on Artwork’s Authenticity: Focusing on the Artist’s Disavowal Cases\",\"authors\":\"Yunsoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.30582/kdps.2022.35.4.215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cases that the artists denied the works which were known to be their own works (i. e. forgery cases) have been raised for a long time. Also, there were cases that the artist voluntarily acknowledged a forgery as the authentic work of the artist. There are various reasons why artists carry through their arguments that contradict the facts and court’s decision of the authenticity of the artwork in issue; to defend the artist's own social honor or subjective honor, or to strongly express the artist’s favor on the usage or ownership of the work, or due to some other interest matters related the work, etc. There are two types of artists’ disavowal; (1) the artist’s denial of the fact that the artist oneself created the work (i.e. usually meaning the 'forgery'); (2) the artist’s announcement that the artwork is no longer his or her work based on some incidents (damage, alteration of the work, or consumption and usage of the work that the artist did not want, etc.) to prevent further attribution of the artist’s name on the work or transaction of the work. When the dispute over the forgery of a work or the legality of an artist’s disavowal of a work rises, the artwork’s price in the market might go extremely unstable or it could be excluded from the auction. Moreover, not only the author but also the various parties such as the dealer, gallery owner, collector, or owner of the artwork can file lawsuits involving diverse issues like infringement of the artist’s right to attribution or right to integrity, or breach of contract issues, etc. The court reviews the claims of the parties, expert opinions, and the evidence of facts relevant to the work. Factual evidence of the art transaction and the artist’s history tends to play a great role in the court’s decision. However, if the parties continue to adhere to their stance despite the authentication results or the court decision, it causes various problems in the art market. This paper tries to find a way to protect both the freedom of trade and the safety of trade while respecting the various parties’ interests, the opinions of the art professionals, and the decision of the judiciary. In addition, this paper covers the methods of attributing the author and indicating artwork’s information during controversies, and ideas for drafting the contract and legal documents for such cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korea Copyright Commission\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korea Copyright Commission\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2022.35.4.215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Copyright Commission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2022.35.4.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,艺术家否认已知是自己作品的作品(即伪造案件)一直被提起。此外,也有艺术家自愿承认赝品是自己的真迹的情况。艺术家之所以坚持他们的论点,与事实和法院对争议艺术品真实性的裁决相矛盾,原因有很多;为维护艺术家自身的社会荣誉或主观荣誉,或为强烈表达艺术家对作品的使用或所有权的偏爱,或出于与作品有关的其他利益事项等。艺术家的否认有两种类型;(1)艺术家否认艺术家本人创作该作品的事实(即通常指“赝品”);(2)艺术家宣布该作品不再是他或她的作品,基于某些事件(损坏,更改作品,或艺术家不想要的作品的消费和使用等),以防止艺术家的名字进一步归属于作品或作品的交易。当一件作品的伪造争议或艺术家否认一件作品的合法性上升时,艺术品在市场上的价格可能会非常不稳定,或者可能会被排除在拍卖之外。此外,不仅是作者,经销商、画廊老板、收藏家、艺术品所有者等各方都可以提起诉讼,涉及侵犯艺术家的署名权、完整权、违约等各种问题。法院审查当事人的主张、专家意见和与工作有关的事实证据。艺术品交易的事实证据和艺术家的历史往往在法院的判决中发挥重要作用。然而,如果当事人不顾鉴定结果或法院判决继续坚持自己的立场,就会在艺术市场上引发各种问题。本文试图找到一条既保护贸易自由又保护贸易安全的道路,同时尊重各方利益,尊重艺术专业人士的意见,尊重司法部门的决定。此外,本文还讨论了争议中作者归属和艺术品信息标注的方法,以及此类案件中合同和法律文书的起草思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discussion based on the Copyright Law about When the Artist Controverts the Decision on Artwork’s Authenticity: Focusing on the Artist’s Disavowal Cases
Cases that the artists denied the works which were known to be their own works (i. e. forgery cases) have been raised for a long time. Also, there were cases that the artist voluntarily acknowledged a forgery as the authentic work of the artist. There are various reasons why artists carry through their arguments that contradict the facts and court’s decision of the authenticity of the artwork in issue; to defend the artist's own social honor or subjective honor, or to strongly express the artist’s favor on the usage or ownership of the work, or due to some other interest matters related the work, etc. There are two types of artists’ disavowal; (1) the artist’s denial of the fact that the artist oneself created the work (i.e. usually meaning the 'forgery'); (2) the artist’s announcement that the artwork is no longer his or her work based on some incidents (damage, alteration of the work, or consumption and usage of the work that the artist did not want, etc.) to prevent further attribution of the artist’s name on the work or transaction of the work. When the dispute over the forgery of a work or the legality of an artist’s disavowal of a work rises, the artwork’s price in the market might go extremely unstable or it could be excluded from the auction. Moreover, not only the author but also the various parties such as the dealer, gallery owner, collector, or owner of the artwork can file lawsuits involving diverse issues like infringement of the artist’s right to attribution or right to integrity, or breach of contract issues, etc. The court reviews the claims of the parties, expert opinions, and the evidence of facts relevant to the work. Factual evidence of the art transaction and the artist’s history tends to play a great role in the court’s decision. However, if the parties continue to adhere to their stance despite the authentication results or the court decision, it causes various problems in the art market. This paper tries to find a way to protect both the freedom of trade and the safety of trade while respecting the various parties’ interests, the opinions of the art professionals, and the decision of the judiciary. In addition, this paper covers the methods of attributing the author and indicating artwork’s information during controversies, and ideas for drafting the contract and legal documents for such cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limitations on Granting Copyrights to AI-Generated Works and Alternative Protection Methodologies The Meaning and Content of Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution as a Standard for Constitutionality Review Determining Fair Use and the Role of Transformative Use Test: On the Rulings in Wofsy v. De Fontbrune Quo vadis, What will be the Future of Appropriation Art?: Focusing on “The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith” A Study on the Free Use of Public Works: Focused on the Seoul Central District Court’s 2019 Gadan 5207564 Decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1