使用WiFi和BLE指纹识别的智能手机接近检测

Stefan Kalabakov, A. Švigelj, T. Javornik
{"title":"使用WiFi和BLE指纹识别的智能手机接近检测","authors":"Stefan Kalabakov, A. Švigelj, T. Javornik","doi":"10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of events such as the recent pandemic and many potential applications in fields such as the social sciences, healthcare, and architecture, the detection of interactions or proximity between people has become increasingly important. In this context, this paper investigates the limitations of a machine learning-based approach that detects the proximity of two devices based on the WiFi and BLE fingerprints of their radio environments. More specifically, (i) we compare the use of a rudimentary set of two features and an extended, more complex set of features, (ii) we investigate the use of separate classifiers that treat WiFi and BLE features separately, and (iii) we investigate whether using only one of the two communication technologies for detection could provide better results. In addition, we also try to use techniques such as undersampling and oversampling or their combination to deal with the highly imbalanced set of examples. Our results show that the use of a more complex set of features that can be subjected to further feature selection procedures can provide a performance benefit of about 4.6 percentage points. In terms of the communication technologies used, our results also show that using BLE alone always gives significantly worse results than using WiFi alone or WiFi and BLE together. On the other hand, there is no clear winner between using WiFi alone or combining WiFi and BLE, as both provide comparable results. Finally, our results also show that using under/oversampling helps in scenarios where the classification task is somewhat more complex, but not in those where the diversity between instances is low; thus, the classification problem is simpler.","PeriodicalId":114443,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartphone Proximity Detection Using WiFi and BLE Fingerprinting\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Kalabakov, A. Švigelj, T. Javornik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In light of events such as the recent pandemic and many potential applications in fields such as the social sciences, healthcare, and architecture, the detection of interactions or proximity between people has become increasingly important. In this context, this paper investigates the limitations of a machine learning-based approach that detects the proximity of two devices based on the WiFi and BLE fingerprints of their radio environments. More specifically, (i) we compare the use of a rudimentary set of two features and an extended, more complex set of features, (ii) we investigate the use of separate classifiers that treat WiFi and BLE features separately, and (iii) we investigate whether using only one of the two communication technologies for detection could provide better results. In addition, we also try to use techniques such as undersampling and oversampling or their combination to deal with the highly imbalanced set of examples. Our results show that the use of a more complex set of features that can be subjected to further feature selection procedures can provide a performance benefit of about 4.6 percentage points. In terms of the communication technologies used, our results also show that using BLE alone always gives significantly worse results than using WiFi alone or WiFi and BLE together. On the other hand, there is no clear winner between using WiFi alone or combining WiFi and BLE, as both provide comparable results. Finally, our results also show that using under/oversampling helps in scenarios where the classification task is somewhat more complex, but not in those where the diversity between instances is low; thus, the classification problem is simpler.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

鉴于最近的大流行等事件,以及在社会科学、医疗保健和建筑等领域的许多潜在应用,检测人与人之间的互动或接近变得越来越重要。在此背景下,本文研究了基于机器学习的方法的局限性,该方法基于无线环境的WiFi和BLE指纹检测两个设备的接近程度。更具体地说,(i)我们比较了两个基本特征集和一个扩展的、更复杂的特征集的使用,(ii)我们研究了单独分类器的使用,分别对待WiFi和BLE特征,(iii)我们研究了仅使用两种通信技术中的一种进行检测是否可以提供更好的结果。此外,我们还尝试使用欠采样和过采样或它们的组合等技术来处理高度不平衡的示例集。我们的研究结果表明,使用一组更复杂的特征,这些特征可以经过进一步的特征选择过程,可以提供大约4.6个百分点的性能优势。在使用的通信技术方面,我们的研究结果也表明,单独使用BLE的效果总是明显差于单独使用WiFi或WiFi与BLE一起使用。另一方面,单独使用WiFi或将WiFi和BLE结合使用并没有明显的赢家,因为两者提供的结果是相似的。最后,我们的结果还表明,在分类任务比较复杂的情况下,使用欠采样/过采样是有帮助的,但在实例之间的多样性较低的情况下则没有帮助;这样,分类问题就简单了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smartphone Proximity Detection Using WiFi and BLE Fingerprinting
In light of events such as the recent pandemic and many potential applications in fields such as the social sciences, healthcare, and architecture, the detection of interactions or proximity between people has become increasingly important. In this context, this paper investigates the limitations of a machine learning-based approach that detects the proximity of two devices based on the WiFi and BLE fingerprints of their radio environments. More specifically, (i) we compare the use of a rudimentary set of two features and an extended, more complex set of features, (ii) we investigate the use of separate classifiers that treat WiFi and BLE features separately, and (iii) we investigate whether using only one of the two communication technologies for detection could provide better results. In addition, we also try to use techniques such as undersampling and oversampling or their combination to deal with the highly imbalanced set of examples. Our results show that the use of a more complex set of features that can be subjected to further feature selection procedures can provide a performance benefit of about 4.6 percentage points. In terms of the communication technologies used, our results also show that using BLE alone always gives significantly worse results than using WiFi alone or WiFi and BLE together. On the other hand, there is no clear winner between using WiFi alone or combining WiFi and BLE, as both provide comparable results. Finally, our results also show that using under/oversampling helps in scenarios where the classification task is somewhat more complex, but not in those where the diversity between instances is low; thus, the classification problem is simpler.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Architecture of MySQL Storage Engines to Increase the Resource Utilization Molecular Communication Transmitter Architectures for the Internet of Bio-Nano Things Markov Model Based Traffic Classification with Multiple Features Statistical Modeling of Sand and Dust Storm Attenuation Calibrated Probabilistic QoT Regression for Unestablished Lightpaths in Optical Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1