目前柴油发动机废气暴露在安大略省建筑业

Stephanie Ziembicki, T. Kirkham, P. Demers, Cheryl E Peters, Melanie Gorman-Ng, H. Davies, T. Tenkate, S. Kalengé, Nicola Blagrove-Hall, Kate Jardine, V. Arrandale
{"title":"目前柴油发动机废气暴露在安大略省建筑业","authors":"Stephanie Ziembicki, T. Kirkham, P. Demers, Cheryl E Peters, Melanie Gorman-Ng, H. Davies, T. Tenkate, S. Kalengé, Nicola Blagrove-Hall, Kate Jardine, V. Arrandale","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.37006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diesel engine exhaust (DEE) is a known carcinogen and a common occupational exposure in Canada, particularly within construction. The use of diesel-powered equipment in the construction industry is widespread, but little is known about DEE exposures and occupational disease in this work setting. The objective of this study was to characterize and identify key determinants of DEE exposure at construction sites in Ontario. \nMethods: Diesel particulate matter (DPM) measurements were taken from workers employed on seven infrastructure construction worksites in Ontario. Full-shift personal air samples were collected from workers using a constant-flow pump and SKC aluminum cyclone with 37-mm quartz fibre filters in an open-faced cassette. Samples were analyzed for elemental carbon (EC), a surrogate of DEE exposure, following NIOSH method 5040. Exposures were compared to recommended health-based limits, including the Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Safety (DECOS) limit (1.03µg/m3 respirable EC) and the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) recommendation (5µg/m3 respirable EC). A determinants of exposure model was constructed. \nResults: In total, 126 DPM samples were collected, ranging from <0.47-52.58µg/m3 with a geometric mean (GM) of 4.23µg/m3 (geometric standard deviation (GSD)=3.05). Overall, 44.8% of samples exceeded the FIOH limit, mostly within underground worksites (93.5%), and 88.8% exceeded the DECOS limit. Underground workers (GM=13.20µg/m3, GSD=1.83) had exposures approximately 4-times higher than below grade workers (GM=3.56µg/m3, GSD=1.94) and 9-times higher than aboveground workers (GM=1.49µg/m3, GSD=1.75). Work grade, enclosed cabs, and seasonality were identified as the major determinants of exposure. \nConclusions: This study provides a better understanding of current DPM exposure in Canadian construction. Most exposures were above recommended health-based limits, signifying a need to further reduce DPM levels in construction. These results can inform a hazard reduction strategy including a new occupational exposure limit and targeted intervention/control measures to reduce DPM exposure and the burden of occupational cancer.","PeriodicalId":265882,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current diesel engine exhaust exposure in the Ontario construction industry\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Ziembicki, T. Kirkham, P. Demers, Cheryl E Peters, Melanie Gorman-Ng, H. Davies, T. Tenkate, S. Kalengé, Nicola Blagrove-Hall, Kate Jardine, V. Arrandale\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.37006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Diesel engine exhaust (DEE) is a known carcinogen and a common occupational exposure in Canada, particularly within construction. The use of diesel-powered equipment in the construction industry is widespread, but little is known about DEE exposures and occupational disease in this work setting. The objective of this study was to characterize and identify key determinants of DEE exposure at construction sites in Ontario. \\nMethods: Diesel particulate matter (DPM) measurements were taken from workers employed on seven infrastructure construction worksites in Ontario. Full-shift personal air samples were collected from workers using a constant-flow pump and SKC aluminum cyclone with 37-mm quartz fibre filters in an open-faced cassette. Samples were analyzed for elemental carbon (EC), a surrogate of DEE exposure, following NIOSH method 5040. Exposures were compared to recommended health-based limits, including the Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Safety (DECOS) limit (1.03µg/m3 respirable EC) and the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) recommendation (5µg/m3 respirable EC). A determinants of exposure model was constructed. \\nResults: In total, 126 DPM samples were collected, ranging from <0.47-52.58µg/m3 with a geometric mean (GM) of 4.23µg/m3 (geometric standard deviation (GSD)=3.05). Overall, 44.8% of samples exceeded the FIOH limit, mostly within underground worksites (93.5%), and 88.8% exceeded the DECOS limit. Underground workers (GM=13.20µg/m3, GSD=1.83) had exposures approximately 4-times higher than below grade workers (GM=3.56µg/m3, GSD=1.94) and 9-times higher than aboveground workers (GM=1.49µg/m3, GSD=1.75). Work grade, enclosed cabs, and seasonality were identified as the major determinants of exposure. \\nConclusions: This study provides a better understanding of current DPM exposure in Canadian construction. Most exposures were above recommended health-based limits, signifying a need to further reduce DPM levels in construction. These results can inform a hazard reduction strategy including a new occupational exposure limit and targeted intervention/control measures to reduce DPM exposure and the burden of occupational cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.37006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.37006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:柴油机废气(DEE)是一种已知的致癌物,也是加拿大常见的职业暴露,特别是在建筑行业。在建筑工业中广泛使用柴油动力设备,但对这种工作环境中的DEE暴露和职业病知之甚少。本研究的目的是表征和确定安大略省建筑工地DEE暴露的关键决定因素。方法:对安大略省七个基础设施建设工地的工人进行柴油颗粒物(DPM)测量。使用恒流泵和SKC铝旋流器收集工人的全班次个人空气样本,该旋流器带有37毫米石英纤维过滤器,位于开放式盒式中。根据NIOSH 5040方法分析样品中的元素碳(EC),这是DEE暴露的替代物。将暴露量与基于健康的建议限值进行比较,包括荷兰职业安全专家委员会(DECOS)限值(1.03µg/m3可吸入EC)和芬兰职业卫生研究所(FIOH)建议限值(5µg/m3可吸入EC)。建立了暴露决定因素模型。结果:共采集到DPM样品126份,范围<0.47 ~ 52.58µg/m3,几何平均值(GM)为4.23µg/m3(几何标准差(GSD)=3.05)。总体而言,44.8%的样品超过FIOH限值(93.5%),主要是地下工地,88.8%的样品超过DECOS限值。地下工人(GM=13.20µg/m3, GSD=1.83)的暴露量大约是地下工人(GM=3.56µg/m3, GSD=1.94)的4倍,是地上工人(GM=1.49µg/m3, GSD=1.75)的9倍。工作等级、封闭驾驶室和季节性被确定为暴露的主要决定因素。结论:本研究对加拿大建筑中DPM暴露的现状提供了更好的了解。大多数接触量高于建议的基于健康的限值,表明需要进一步降低建筑中的DPM水平。这些结果可以为减少危害战略提供信息,包括新的职业暴露限值和有针对性的干预/控制措施,以减少DPM暴露和职业癌症负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current diesel engine exhaust exposure in the Ontario construction industry
Introduction: Diesel engine exhaust (DEE) is a known carcinogen and a common occupational exposure in Canada, particularly within construction. The use of diesel-powered equipment in the construction industry is widespread, but little is known about DEE exposures and occupational disease in this work setting. The objective of this study was to characterize and identify key determinants of DEE exposure at construction sites in Ontario. Methods: Diesel particulate matter (DPM) measurements were taken from workers employed on seven infrastructure construction worksites in Ontario. Full-shift personal air samples were collected from workers using a constant-flow pump and SKC aluminum cyclone with 37-mm quartz fibre filters in an open-faced cassette. Samples were analyzed for elemental carbon (EC), a surrogate of DEE exposure, following NIOSH method 5040. Exposures were compared to recommended health-based limits, including the Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Safety (DECOS) limit (1.03µg/m3 respirable EC) and the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) recommendation (5µg/m3 respirable EC). A determinants of exposure model was constructed. Results: In total, 126 DPM samples were collected, ranging from <0.47-52.58µg/m3 with a geometric mean (GM) of 4.23µg/m3 (geometric standard deviation (GSD)=3.05). Overall, 44.8% of samples exceeded the FIOH limit, mostly within underground worksites (93.5%), and 88.8% exceeded the DECOS limit. Underground workers (GM=13.20µg/m3, GSD=1.83) had exposures approximately 4-times higher than below grade workers (GM=3.56µg/m3, GSD=1.94) and 9-times higher than aboveground workers (GM=1.49µg/m3, GSD=1.75). Work grade, enclosed cabs, and seasonality were identified as the major determinants of exposure. Conclusions: This study provides a better understanding of current DPM exposure in Canadian construction. Most exposures were above recommended health-based limits, signifying a need to further reduce DPM levels in construction. These results can inform a hazard reduction strategy including a new occupational exposure limit and targeted intervention/control measures to reduce DPM exposure and the burden of occupational cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Body Mass Index Among ‎Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials Enhancing the care experiences of Black women along the breast cancer journey: Meaningfully engaging breast cancer survivors to co-create a targeted, culturally relevant resource hub Impact of Medical Legal Partnerships: A Scoping Review Exploring Experiences with Social Inclusion, Food Security and Housing Among People Living with HIV: A Qualitative Analysis Rethinking public health pedagogy: lessons learned and pertinent questions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1