采用三水平周向进口流体旋转的环向槽定子和光滑转子液体环密封的静、动特性

D. Childs, Jose Torres, Joshua T. Bullock
{"title":"采用三水平周向进口流体旋转的环向槽定子和光滑转子液体环密封的静、动特性","authors":"D. Childs, Jose Torres, Joshua T. Bullock","doi":"10.1115/GT2018-75325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test results are presented for a smooth-rotor/circumferentially-grooved, annular pump seal. The seal’s geometry and operating conditions are representative of electrical submersible pumps (ESPs) as used for oil recovery; however, most ESPs use grooved rotors instead of grooved stators. Test results include static and rotordynamic data at speeds ω of 2, 4, 6 krpm, axial pressure drops ΔP of 2.1, 4.1, 6.2, 8.3 bars. The grooved seal has a length-to-diameter ratio L/D of 0.5 and a minimum radial clearance Cr of 203 μm. It employs 15 circumferential grooves with a length Gl, and depth Gd of 1.52 mm, which are equally-spaced by a land length of 1.52 mm. Tests are conducted for eccentricity ratios ϵ0 of 0.00, 0.27, 0.53, 0.80. Three different inlet-fluid prerotation inserts are used upstream of the test seals to create a range of inlet preswirl ratios. Pitot tubes are used to measure the circumferential velocity at one location immediately upstream of the test seal and one downstream location near the seal exit. The test fluid is ISOVG2 oil @ 46 °C. Test results for the grooved seal are compared to test results for a smooth annular seal with the same L, D, and minimum Cr. The grooved-seal’s leakage rate Q̇, ranges from a low 15.64 LPM at ω = 6 krpm, and ΔP = 2 bar, to a high 56.36 LPM at ω = 2 krpm, and ΔP = 8 bar. When compared to the smooth seal, the grooved seal provides a 20% Q̇ reduction at ω = 2 krpm, and a 6% reduction at ω = 6 krpm. The grooved seal’s rotordynamic coefficients are generally not sensitive to changes in ϵ0. The smooth seal’s stiffness and damping coefficients are not very sensitive to changes in ϵ0 in moving from ϵ0 = 0 to 0.5, but typically increase dramatically in magnitude in moving from ϵ0 = 0.5 to 0.8. From a rotordynamic viewpoint, the major difference between the two seals concerns the direct stiffness coefficients, with the grooved seal having near zero to negative values and the smooth seal having larger positive values, particularly at increased ϵ0 values. The grooved seal generally produces lower-magnitude cross-coupled stiffness and direct damping coefficient values than the smooth seal.","PeriodicalId":131756,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static and Rotordynamic Characteristics of Liquid Annular Seals With a Circumferentially-Grooved Stator and Smooth Rotor Using Three Levels of Circumferential Inlet-Fluid Rotation\",\"authors\":\"D. Childs, Jose Torres, Joshua T. Bullock\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/GT2018-75325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Test results are presented for a smooth-rotor/circumferentially-grooved, annular pump seal. The seal’s geometry and operating conditions are representative of electrical submersible pumps (ESPs) as used for oil recovery; however, most ESPs use grooved rotors instead of grooved stators. Test results include static and rotordynamic data at speeds ω of 2, 4, 6 krpm, axial pressure drops ΔP of 2.1, 4.1, 6.2, 8.3 bars. The grooved seal has a length-to-diameter ratio L/D of 0.5 and a minimum radial clearance Cr of 203 μm. It employs 15 circumferential grooves with a length Gl, and depth Gd of 1.52 mm, which are equally-spaced by a land length of 1.52 mm. Tests are conducted for eccentricity ratios ϵ0 of 0.00, 0.27, 0.53, 0.80. Three different inlet-fluid prerotation inserts are used upstream of the test seals to create a range of inlet preswirl ratios. Pitot tubes are used to measure the circumferential velocity at one location immediately upstream of the test seal and one downstream location near the seal exit. The test fluid is ISOVG2 oil @ 46 °C. Test results for the grooved seal are compared to test results for a smooth annular seal with the same L, D, and minimum Cr. The grooved-seal’s leakage rate Q̇, ranges from a low 15.64 LPM at ω = 6 krpm, and ΔP = 2 bar, to a high 56.36 LPM at ω = 2 krpm, and ΔP = 8 bar. When compared to the smooth seal, the grooved seal provides a 20% Q̇ reduction at ω = 2 krpm, and a 6% reduction at ω = 6 krpm. The grooved seal’s rotordynamic coefficients are generally not sensitive to changes in ϵ0. The smooth seal’s stiffness and damping coefficients are not very sensitive to changes in ϵ0 in moving from ϵ0 = 0 to 0.5, but typically increase dramatically in magnitude in moving from ϵ0 = 0.5 to 0.8. From a rotordynamic viewpoint, the major difference between the two seals concerns the direct stiffness coefficients, with the grooved seal having near zero to negative values and the smooth seal having larger positive values, particularly at increased ϵ0 values. The grooved seal generally produces lower-magnitude cross-coupled stiffness and direct damping coefficient values than the smooth seal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

给出了一种光滑转子/环向槽环形泵密封的试验结果。密封的几何形状和操作条件代表了用于采油的电潜泵(esp);然而,大多数esp使用槽式转子而不是槽式定子。测试结果包括转速ω为2,4,6 krpm,轴向压降ΔP为2.1,4.1,6.2,8.3 bar时的静态和转子动态数据。槽形密封的长径比L/D为0.5,最小径向间隙Cr为203 μm。它采用15个长Gl、深Gd为1.52 mm的周向沟槽,这些沟槽以1.52 mm的土地长度等距分布。偏心比ϵ0为0.00、0.27、0.53、0.80时进行试验。在测试密封的上游使用了三种不同的进口流体预旋插入,以产生一系列的进口预旋比。皮托管用于测量测试密封上游和密封出口附近的一个下游位置的周向速度。测试流体为46°C的ISOVG2油。将沟槽密封的测试结果与具有相同L、D和最小Cr的光滑环空密封的测试结果进行比较。沟槽密封的泄漏率Q值的范围从ω = 6 krpm和ΔP = 2 bar时的低15.64 LPM到ω = 2 krpm和ΔP = 8 bar时的高56.36 LPM。与光滑密封相比,沟槽密封在ω = 2 krpm时可降低20%的Q值,在ω = 6 krpm时可降低6%的Q值。槽密封的转子动力系数一般对ϵ0的变化不敏感。从ϵ0 = 0到0.5,光滑密封的刚度和阻尼系数对ϵ0的变化不太敏感,但从ϵ0 = 0.5到0.8,其幅度通常会急剧增加。从转子动力学的角度来看,两种密封的主要区别在于直接刚度系数,沟槽密封的值接近于零或负值,而光滑密封的正值较大,特别是在ϵ0值增加时。沟槽密封通常比光滑密封产生更小的交叉耦合刚度和直接阻尼系数值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Static and Rotordynamic Characteristics of Liquid Annular Seals With a Circumferentially-Grooved Stator and Smooth Rotor Using Three Levels of Circumferential Inlet-Fluid Rotation
Test results are presented for a smooth-rotor/circumferentially-grooved, annular pump seal. The seal’s geometry and operating conditions are representative of electrical submersible pumps (ESPs) as used for oil recovery; however, most ESPs use grooved rotors instead of grooved stators. Test results include static and rotordynamic data at speeds ω of 2, 4, 6 krpm, axial pressure drops ΔP of 2.1, 4.1, 6.2, 8.3 bars. The grooved seal has a length-to-diameter ratio L/D of 0.5 and a minimum radial clearance Cr of 203 μm. It employs 15 circumferential grooves with a length Gl, and depth Gd of 1.52 mm, which are equally-spaced by a land length of 1.52 mm. Tests are conducted for eccentricity ratios ϵ0 of 0.00, 0.27, 0.53, 0.80. Three different inlet-fluid prerotation inserts are used upstream of the test seals to create a range of inlet preswirl ratios. Pitot tubes are used to measure the circumferential velocity at one location immediately upstream of the test seal and one downstream location near the seal exit. The test fluid is ISOVG2 oil @ 46 °C. Test results for the grooved seal are compared to test results for a smooth annular seal with the same L, D, and minimum Cr. The grooved-seal’s leakage rate Q̇, ranges from a low 15.64 LPM at ω = 6 krpm, and ΔP = 2 bar, to a high 56.36 LPM at ω = 2 krpm, and ΔP = 8 bar. When compared to the smooth seal, the grooved seal provides a 20% Q̇ reduction at ω = 2 krpm, and a 6% reduction at ω = 6 krpm. The grooved seal’s rotordynamic coefficients are generally not sensitive to changes in ϵ0. The smooth seal’s stiffness and damping coefficients are not very sensitive to changes in ϵ0 in moving from ϵ0 = 0 to 0.5, but typically increase dramatically in magnitude in moving from ϵ0 = 0.5 to 0.8. From a rotordynamic viewpoint, the major difference between the two seals concerns the direct stiffness coefficients, with the grooved seal having near zero to negative values and the smooth seal having larger positive values, particularly at increased ϵ0 values. The grooved seal generally produces lower-magnitude cross-coupled stiffness and direct damping coefficient values than the smooth seal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation, Test and Mitigation of 1/2X Forward Whirl Following Rotor Drop Onto Auxiliary Bearings Study on Vibration Response Characteristics of Mistuned Bladed Disk Expressed by Vibratory Stress Pump Grooved Seals: A CFD Approach to Improve Bulk-Flow Model Predictions Comparison of a Liquid Annular Seal for Pump Applications With and Without a Swirl Brake Prediction of Geometrically Induced Localization Effects Using a Subset of Nominal System Modes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1