改进胸部损伤标准的发展

S. Kuppa, R. Eppinger
{"title":"改进胸部损伤标准的发展","authors":"S. Kuppa, R. Eppinger","doi":"10.4271/983153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, seventy-one frontal impact sled tests were conducted using post-mortem human subjects in the driver's position in an effort to better understand thoracic trauma in frontal impacts. Various contemporary automotive restraint systems were used. The resulting injury from the impact was determined through radiography and detailed autopsy, and its severity was coded according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The measured mechanical responses were analyzed using statistical procedures. In particular, linear logistic regression was used to develop models which associate the measured mechanical parameters to the observed thoracic injury response. Univariate and multivariate models were developed taking into consideration potential confounders and effect modifiers. The risk factors used in the models were normalized concerning the size and weight of the specimen. The gender and age of specimen at time of death were found not to be confounders in this data set. A linear combination of the 3-msec clip value of maximum resultant spine acceleration and maximum normalized chest deflection from an array of five measurements provided the goodness of fit measure. This linear combination was found to have significantly better injury predictive ability, for thoracic trauma in human subjects under any restraint environment, than other existing injury criteria such as VCmax ( Maximum Viscous Criterion), chest deflection, or chest acceleration alone. For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD E201429.","PeriodicalId":291036,"journal":{"name":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an Improved Thoracic Injury Criterion\",\"authors\":\"S. Kuppa, R. Eppinger\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/983153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, seventy-one frontal impact sled tests were conducted using post-mortem human subjects in the driver's position in an effort to better understand thoracic trauma in frontal impacts. Various contemporary automotive restraint systems were used. The resulting injury from the impact was determined through radiography and detailed autopsy, and its severity was coded according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The measured mechanical responses were analyzed using statistical procedures. In particular, linear logistic regression was used to develop models which associate the measured mechanical parameters to the observed thoracic injury response. Univariate and multivariate models were developed taking into consideration potential confounders and effect modifiers. The risk factors used in the models were normalized concerning the size and weight of the specimen. The gender and age of specimen at time of death were found not to be confounders in this data set. A linear combination of the 3-msec clip value of maximum resultant spine acceleration and maximum normalized chest deflection from an array of five measurements provided the goodness of fit measure. This linear combination was found to have significantly better injury predictive ability, for thoracic trauma in human subjects under any restraint environment, than other existing injury criteria such as VCmax ( Maximum Viscous Criterion), chest deflection, or chest acceleration alone. For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD E201429.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"72\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/983153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/983153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

摘要

在这项研究中,为了更好地了解正面碰撞中的胸部创伤,我们使用了71个死后的人类受试者作为驾驶员位置进行了正面碰撞雪橇试验。使用了各种现代汽车约束系统。通过x线摄影和详细的尸检确定撞击造成的损伤,并根据简易损伤量表(AIS)对其严重程度进行编码。测量的力学响应采用统计程序进行分析。特别是,线性逻辑回归用于建立将测量的力学参数与观察到的胸部损伤反应相关联的模型。考虑到潜在的混杂因素和影响修饰因素,建立了单因素和多因素模型。在模型中使用的危险因素是标准化的有关尺寸和重量的标本。在这个数据集中,发现死亡时标本的性别和年龄不是混杂因素。5个测量值的3毫秒剪辑值的最大最终脊柱加速度和最大标准化胸部挠度的线性组合提供了拟合优度测量。研究发现,与VCmax(最大粘性标准)、胸部偏转或胸部加速度等其他现有损伤标准相比,该线性组合在任何约束环境下对人类受试者的胸部创伤具有更好的损伤预测能力。会议摘要见IRRD E201429。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of an Improved Thoracic Injury Criterion
In this study, seventy-one frontal impact sled tests were conducted using post-mortem human subjects in the driver's position in an effort to better understand thoracic trauma in frontal impacts. Various contemporary automotive restraint systems were used. The resulting injury from the impact was determined through radiography and detailed autopsy, and its severity was coded according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The measured mechanical responses were analyzed using statistical procedures. In particular, linear logistic regression was used to develop models which associate the measured mechanical parameters to the observed thoracic injury response. Univariate and multivariate models were developed taking into consideration potential confounders and effect modifiers. The risk factors used in the models were normalized concerning the size and weight of the specimen. The gender and age of specimen at time of death were found not to be confounders in this data set. A linear combination of the 3-msec clip value of maximum resultant spine acceleration and maximum normalized chest deflection from an array of five measurements provided the goodness of fit measure. This linear combination was found to have significantly better injury predictive ability, for thoracic trauma in human subjects under any restraint environment, than other existing injury criteria such as VCmax ( Maximum Viscous Criterion), chest deflection, or chest acceleration alone. For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD E201429.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INNOVATIVE CHIP SET FOR PRESSURE AND ACCELERATION BASED AIRBAG SOLUTIONS. IN: AIR BAGS AND BELT RESTRAINTS A STUDY OF DRIVER'S MANEUVER CHARACTERISTICS USING THE JOY-STICK DEVICE. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT BOUNCE-OVERS: FIXED OBJECT IMPACTS FOLLOWED BY ROLLOVERS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS EVALUATION OF A VOICE-ACTIVATED SYSTEM USING A DRIVING SIMULATOR. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT HOW TO USE PC-CRASH TO SIMULATE ROLLOVER CRASHES. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1