{"title":"生物活性药物对牙槽嵴增强的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Che-Hao Ting Che-Hao Ting, Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai Che-Hao Ting, Chia-Dan Cheng Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai, Wen-Hsiang Huang Chia-Dan Cheng, Da-Yo Yuh Wen-Hsiang Huang, 林詩淳 Da-Yo Yuh, Chih-Chi Sheen Shih-Chun Lin, Wan-Chien Cheng Chih-Chi Sheen","doi":"10.53106/261634032022040501006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives: This review aimed at investigating the impact of bioactive agents on alveolar ridge augmentation at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges. Material and Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted for articles up to April 2021. Human randomized clinical trials, clinical trials, or retrospective studies reporting outcomes of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with or without bioactive agents were included. Sinus lifting or extraction socket preservation articles were excluded in this study. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to investigate ridge dimensional changes and complication rate. Results: Overall, ten articles were included in the quantitative analysis. In bone width and height augmentation, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.38 mm (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.69 mm, p = 0.02) when comparing sites with and without PRP/PRF. The WMD of the vertical bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.46 mm (95% CI = 0.06 to 0.86 mm, p = 0.02) when comparing sites with and without platelet- rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). When evaluating the effect of adjunctive use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) at alveolar ridge augmentation sites compared to alveolar ridge augmentation sites without BMP application, the WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.90 mm (95% CI = 0.30 to 1.49 mm, p = 0.003). In addition, the odds ratio of the titanium mesh exposure was 0.13 (95% CI of 0.02 to 0.71, p = 0.02). All analyses showed favorable outcomes at the sites with bioactive agent. Conclusion: Within the limits of this review, application of bioactive agents during alveolar ridge augmentation procedures presents increased horizontal and vertical bone augmentative changes. The complication rate can also be reduced with usage of PRP/PRF in titanium mesh-guided alveolar ridge augmentation.\n \n","PeriodicalId":150986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Bioactive Agents on Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Che-Hao Ting Che-Hao Ting, Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai Che-Hao Ting, Chia-Dan Cheng Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai, Wen-Hsiang Huang Chia-Dan Cheng, Da-Yo Yuh Wen-Hsiang Huang, 林詩淳 Da-Yo Yuh, Chih-Chi Sheen Shih-Chun Lin, Wan-Chien Cheng Chih-Chi Sheen\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/261634032022040501006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Objectives: This review aimed at investigating the impact of bioactive agents on alveolar ridge augmentation at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges. Material and Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted for articles up to April 2021. Human randomized clinical trials, clinical trials, or retrospective studies reporting outcomes of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with or without bioactive agents were included. Sinus lifting or extraction socket preservation articles were excluded in this study. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to investigate ridge dimensional changes and complication rate. Results: Overall, ten articles were included in the quantitative analysis. In bone width and height augmentation, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.38 mm (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.69 mm, p = 0.02) when comparing sites with and without PRP/PRF. The WMD of the vertical bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.46 mm (95% CI = 0.06 to 0.86 mm, p = 0.02) when comparing sites with and without platelet- rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). When evaluating the effect of adjunctive use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) at alveolar ridge augmentation sites compared to alveolar ridge augmentation sites without BMP application, the WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.90 mm (95% CI = 0.30 to 1.49 mm, p = 0.003). In addition, the odds ratio of the titanium mesh exposure was 0.13 (95% CI of 0.02 to 0.71, p = 0.02). All analyses showed favorable outcomes at the sites with bioactive agent. Conclusion: Within the limits of this review, application of bioactive agents during alveolar ridge augmentation procedures presents increased horizontal and vertical bone augmentative changes. The complication rate can also be reduced with usage of PRP/PRF in titanium mesh-guided alveolar ridge augmentation.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":150986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022040501006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022040501006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本综述旨在探讨生物活性药物对种植体周围牙槽嵴和无牙牙槽嵴的影响。材料和方法:对截至2021年4月的文章进行了电子和手工文献检索。人类随机临床试验、临床试验或回顾性研究报告了有或没有生物活性药物的牙槽嵴增强手术的结果。本研究排除了鼻窦提升或拔牙窝保存物品。进行随机效应荟萃分析以调查脊尺寸变化和并发症发生率。结果:共纳入10篇文章进行定量分析。在骨宽和骨高增加方面,无牙嵴水平骨增重加权平均差(WMD)为0.38 mm (95% CI = 0.07 ~ 0.69 mm, p = 0.02)。在有无富血小板血浆(PRP)或富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)的情况下,无牙嵴垂直骨增重的WMD为0.46 mm (95% CI = 0.06 ~ 0.86 mm, p = 0.02)。当评估在牙槽嵴增强部位辅助使用骨形态发生蛋白(BMPs)与不使用BMP的牙槽嵴增强部位的效果时,无牙嵴水平骨增加的WMD为0.90 mm (95% CI = 0.30至1.49 mm, p = 0.003)。此外,钛网暴露的优势比为0.13 (95% CI为0.02 ~ 0.71,p = 0.02)。所有的分析结果都表明,在使用生物活性药物的部位效果良好。结论:在本综述的范围内,在牙槽嵴增强术中应用生物活性药物会增加水平和垂直骨增强的变化。使用PRP/PRF钛网引导牙槽嵴增强术也可降低并发症发生率。
Effect of Bioactive Agents on Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objectives: This review aimed at investigating the impact of bioactive agents on alveolar ridge augmentation at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges. Material and Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted for articles up to April 2021. Human randomized clinical trials, clinical trials, or retrospective studies reporting outcomes of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with or without bioactive agents were included. Sinus lifting or extraction socket preservation articles were excluded in this study. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to investigate ridge dimensional changes and complication rate. Results: Overall, ten articles were included in the quantitative analysis. In bone width and height augmentation, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.38 mm (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.69 mm, p = 0.02) when comparing sites with and without PRP/PRF. The WMD of the vertical bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.46 mm (95% CI = 0.06 to 0.86 mm, p = 0.02) when comparing sites with and without platelet- rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). When evaluating the effect of adjunctive use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) at alveolar ridge augmentation sites compared to alveolar ridge augmentation sites without BMP application, the WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was 0.90 mm (95% CI = 0.30 to 1.49 mm, p = 0.003). In addition, the odds ratio of the titanium mesh exposure was 0.13 (95% CI of 0.02 to 0.71, p = 0.02). All analyses showed favorable outcomes at the sites with bioactive agent. Conclusion: Within the limits of this review, application of bioactive agents during alveolar ridge augmentation procedures presents increased horizontal and vertical bone augmentative changes. The complication rate can also be reduced with usage of PRP/PRF in titanium mesh-guided alveolar ridge augmentation.