不同抗生素胶结剂联合治疗痤疮表皮杆菌的体外分析

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2023.06.025
Amrit Vinod MD , Thomas Listopadzki MD , Kevin Kohut MD , Sonja Pavlesen MD , John Crane MD, PhD , Lin Feng MA , Thomas Duquin MD , Matthew DiPaola MD
{"title":"不同抗生素胶结剂联合治疗痤疮表皮杆菌的体外分析","authors":"Amrit Vinod MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Listopadzki MD ,&nbsp;Kevin Kohut MD ,&nbsp;Sonja Pavlesen MD ,&nbsp;John Crane MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lin Feng MA ,&nbsp;Thomas Duquin MD ,&nbsp;Matthew DiPaola MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2023.06.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><em>Cutibacterium acnes</em> is the most common cause of prosthetic shoulder infection. Treatment often requires the placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. The exact combination of antibiotic and cement that best targets this organism is not fully understood. In this study, we performed an <em>in vitro</em> investigation of various antibiotic combinations in Simplex and Palacos cement to determine their efficacy against three <em>C acnes</em> strains. We hypothesized that gentamicin alone would underperform other antibiotics including vancomycin and ertapenem against <em>C acnes</em> in an <em>in vitro</em> environment. Additionally, we hypothesized that Palacos cement would outperform Simplex cement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Strains were cultured and antibiotic cement beads were plated in six combinations. Zones of inhibition (mm) were measured, and beads were transferred to a new culture plate at 7-day intervals. This procedure was carried out for 81 days. Mixed model for longitudinal repeated measures for continuous data was used to determine the antibiotic combination that produced the most robust zone of inhibition over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For vancomycin, gentamicin, and vancomycin + gentamicin, these data demonstrated that for two strains, Palacos cement with vancomycin and gentamicin produced the most robust zone of inhibition over time (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001, respectively). For one strain, Palacos cement combined with vancomycin alone produced the most robust response (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). The second highest response for this strain was seen in Palacos cement combined with vancomycin and gentamicin. Ertapenem induced the largest response among all antibiotics that we tested against all 3 strains, but its effect was short-lived (one week or less) compared to vancomycin or vancomycin with gentamicin (35-81 days). Gentamicin response in both cement combinations against <em>C acnes</em> was weak and lasted at most 14 days.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>These data suggest that Palacos cement likely offers a better elution profile than Simplex in <em>in vitro C acnes</em>-related prosthetic shoulder infection strains. Vancomycin and gentamicin in combination demonstrated the most prolonged response for eradication of the 3 <em>C acnes</em> strains tested. Additionally, ertapenem may be a promising option as it showed a short-lived but robust clearing response. Gentamicin weakly inhibits <em>C acnes</em> growth calling into question its use in premade spacers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 707-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452723001062/pdfft?md5=ebbfc6bc0d7e6f8a454a93fcabd543bc&pid=1-s2.0-S1045452723001062-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An in vitro analysis of various antibiotic cement combinations against Cutibacterium acnes\",\"authors\":\"Amrit Vinod MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Listopadzki MD ,&nbsp;Kevin Kohut MD ,&nbsp;Sonja Pavlesen MD ,&nbsp;John Crane MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lin Feng MA ,&nbsp;Thomas Duquin MD ,&nbsp;Matthew DiPaola MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2023.06.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><em>Cutibacterium acnes</em> is the most common cause of prosthetic shoulder infection. Treatment often requires the placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. The exact combination of antibiotic and cement that best targets this organism is not fully understood. In this study, we performed an <em>in vitro</em> investigation of various antibiotic combinations in Simplex and Palacos cement to determine their efficacy against three <em>C acnes</em> strains. We hypothesized that gentamicin alone would underperform other antibiotics including vancomycin and ertapenem against <em>C acnes</em> in an <em>in vitro</em> environment. Additionally, we hypothesized that Palacos cement would outperform Simplex cement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Strains were cultured and antibiotic cement beads were plated in six combinations. Zones of inhibition (mm) were measured, and beads were transferred to a new culture plate at 7-day intervals. This procedure was carried out for 81 days. Mixed model for longitudinal repeated measures for continuous data was used to determine the antibiotic combination that produced the most robust zone of inhibition over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For vancomycin, gentamicin, and vancomycin + gentamicin, these data demonstrated that for two strains, Palacos cement with vancomycin and gentamicin produced the most robust zone of inhibition over time (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001, respectively). For one strain, Palacos cement combined with vancomycin alone produced the most robust response (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). The second highest response for this strain was seen in Palacos cement combined with vancomycin and gentamicin. Ertapenem induced the largest response among all antibiotics that we tested against all 3 strains, but its effect was short-lived (one week or less) compared to vancomycin or vancomycin with gentamicin (35-81 days). Gentamicin response in both cement combinations against <em>C acnes</em> was weak and lasted at most 14 days.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>These data suggest that Palacos cement likely offers a better elution profile than Simplex in <em>in vitro C acnes</em>-related prosthetic shoulder infection strains. Vancomycin and gentamicin in combination demonstrated the most prolonged response for eradication of the 3 <em>C acnes</em> strains tested. Additionally, ertapenem may be a promising option as it showed a short-lived but robust clearing response. Gentamicin weakly inhibits <em>C acnes</em> growth calling into question its use in premade spacers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 707-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452723001062/pdfft?md5=ebbfc6bc0d7e6f8a454a93fcabd543bc&pid=1-s2.0-S1045452723001062-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452723001062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452723001062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:痤疮表皮杆菌是导致假肩感染的最常见原因。治疗通常需要放置含有抗生素的水泥隔离剂。抗生素和水泥的确切组合,最好地针对这种生物体尚不完全清楚。在这项研究中,我们对Simplex和Palacos水泥中的各种抗生素组合进行了体外研究,以确定它们对三种C型痤疮菌株的疗效。我们假设在体外环境中,庆大霉素单独治疗C型痤疮的效果不如万古霉素和厄他培南等其他抗生素。此外,我们假设Palacos水泥将优于Simplex水泥。方法对菌株进行培养,并将抗生素水泥珠镀成6种组合。测定抑制区(mm),每隔7天将微珠转移到新的培养板上。这一过程进行了81天。使用连续数据纵向重复测量的混合模型来确定抗生素组合,随着时间的推移产生最强大的抑制区。结果对于万古霉素、庆大霉素和万古霉素+庆大霉素,这些数据表明,随着时间的推移,Palacos水泥与万古霉素和庆大霉素产生了最强大的抑制区(P <.0001, P <分别为。)。对于一种菌株,Palacos水泥与万古霉素单独结合产生了最强劲的反应(P <。)。该菌株的第二高反应是Palacos水泥与万古霉素和庆大霉素联合使用。在我们测试的所有抗生素中,埃他培南对所有3株菌株的反应最大,但与万古霉素或万古霉素与庆大霉素(35-81天)相比,其作用时间较短(一周或更短)。庆大霉素对C型痤疮的反应较弱,最多持续14天。这些数据表明,在体外C型痤疮相关的假体肩部感染菌株中,Palacos水泥可能比Simplex具有更好的洗脱效果。万古霉素和庆大霉素联合使用对C型痤疮菌株的根除效果最持久。此外,厄他培南可能是一个有希望的选择,因为它显示出短暂但强劲的清除反应。庆大霉素对C痤疮生长的抑制作用较弱,这使其在预制间隔剂中的使用受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An in vitro analysis of various antibiotic cement combinations against Cutibacterium acnes

Background

Cutibacterium acnes is the most common cause of prosthetic shoulder infection. Treatment often requires the placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. The exact combination of antibiotic and cement that best targets this organism is not fully understood. In this study, we performed an in vitro investigation of various antibiotic combinations in Simplex and Palacos cement to determine their efficacy against three C acnes strains. We hypothesized that gentamicin alone would underperform other antibiotics including vancomycin and ertapenem against C acnes in an in vitro environment. Additionally, we hypothesized that Palacos cement would outperform Simplex cement.

Methods

Strains were cultured and antibiotic cement beads were plated in six combinations. Zones of inhibition (mm) were measured, and beads were transferred to a new culture plate at 7-day intervals. This procedure was carried out for 81 days. Mixed model for longitudinal repeated measures for continuous data was used to determine the antibiotic combination that produced the most robust zone of inhibition over time.

Results

For vancomycin, gentamicin, and vancomycin + gentamicin, these data demonstrated that for two strains, Palacos cement with vancomycin and gentamicin produced the most robust zone of inhibition over time (P < .0001, P < .0001, respectively). For one strain, Palacos cement combined with vancomycin alone produced the most robust response (P < .0001). The second highest response for this strain was seen in Palacos cement combined with vancomycin and gentamicin. Ertapenem induced the largest response among all antibiotics that we tested against all 3 strains, but its effect was short-lived (one week or less) compared to vancomycin or vancomycin with gentamicin (35-81 days). Gentamicin response in both cement combinations against C acnes was weak and lasted at most 14 days.

Discussion

These data suggest that Palacos cement likely offers a better elution profile than Simplex in in vitro C acnes-related prosthetic shoulder infection strains. Vancomycin and gentamicin in combination demonstrated the most prolonged response for eradication of the 3 C acnes strains tested. Additionally, ertapenem may be a promising option as it showed a short-lived but robust clearing response. Gentamicin weakly inhibits C acnes growth calling into question its use in premade spacers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection with atypical wounds: a case series of 12 patients Artificial intelligence to automatically measure glenoid inclination, humeral alignment, and the lateralization and distalization shoulder angles on postoperative radiographs after reverse shoulder arthroplasty Impact of surgeon variability on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 2188 surgeons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1