协同定位的仿真研究

Xiaogang Qi, Xingcheng Liu, Haijun Dong, Lifang Liu
{"title":"协同定位的仿真研究","authors":"Xiaogang Qi, Xingcheng Liu, Haijun Dong, Lifang Liu","doi":"10.1109/CPGPS.2017.8075144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional algorithms are explained theoretically without provement from the actual simulation, resulting in many non-locatable nodes and selection problems of the proportion of anchor nodes in wireless sensor network. Against these problems, three typical algorithms that start from collaborative localization are simulated in the following two scenarios to compare their performance. The first scenario combines the anchor nodes and blind nodes localized by anchor nodes to localize other blind nodes, while the other blind nodes preferentially localize their position through anchor nodes. Otherwise, blind nodes knowing their position participate in localization only if there aren't anchor nodes less than three. Large simulation results show that the second performs better than first in term of localization error and the number of non-locatable nodes under the same condition. Moreover, the optimal solution is provided for the proper selection of the anchor nodes.","PeriodicalId":340067,"journal":{"name":"2017 Forum on Cooperative Positioning and Service (CPGPS)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation study on cooperative localization\",\"authors\":\"Xiaogang Qi, Xingcheng Liu, Haijun Dong, Lifang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CPGPS.2017.8075144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional algorithms are explained theoretically without provement from the actual simulation, resulting in many non-locatable nodes and selection problems of the proportion of anchor nodes in wireless sensor network. Against these problems, three typical algorithms that start from collaborative localization are simulated in the following two scenarios to compare their performance. The first scenario combines the anchor nodes and blind nodes localized by anchor nodes to localize other blind nodes, while the other blind nodes preferentially localize their position through anchor nodes. Otherwise, blind nodes knowing their position participate in localization only if there aren't anchor nodes less than three. Large simulation results show that the second performs better than first in term of localization error and the number of non-locatable nodes under the same condition. Moreover, the optimal solution is provided for the proper selection of the anchor nodes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Forum on Cooperative Positioning and Service (CPGPS)\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Forum on Cooperative Positioning and Service (CPGPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPGPS.2017.8075144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Forum on Cooperative Positioning and Service (CPGPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPGPS.2017.8075144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的算法都是理论上的解释,没有经过实际的仿真验证,导致无线传感器网络中存在许多不可定位节点和锚节点比例的选择问题。针对这些问题,本文在以下两种场景下对从协同定位开始的三种典型算法进行仿真,比较它们的性能。第一种场景结合锚节点和锚节点定位的盲节点对其他盲节点进行定位,其他盲节点优先通过锚节点定位自己的位置。否则,只有锚节点不少于3个时,知道自己位置的盲节点才会参与定位。大量仿真结果表明,在相同条件下,第二种方法在定位误差和不可定位节点数量方面优于第一种方法。并为锚节点的合理选择提供了最优解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulation study on cooperative localization
Traditional algorithms are explained theoretically without provement from the actual simulation, resulting in many non-locatable nodes and selection problems of the proportion of anchor nodes in wireless sensor network. Against these problems, three typical algorithms that start from collaborative localization are simulated in the following two scenarios to compare their performance. The first scenario combines the anchor nodes and blind nodes localized by anchor nodes to localize other blind nodes, while the other blind nodes preferentially localize their position through anchor nodes. Otherwise, blind nodes knowing their position participate in localization only if there aren't anchor nodes less than three. Large simulation results show that the second performs better than first in term of localization error and the number of non-locatable nodes under the same condition. Moreover, the optimal solution is provided for the proper selection of the anchor nodes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on underwater sound velocity calculation, error correction and positioning algorithms An optimal weighted least squares RAIM algorithm Survey on cyber security of CAV A position self-calibration method in multilateration The application of MEMS GPS receiver in APOD precise orbit determination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1