神经学的信心:教育工作者如何帮助初级医生对抗神经恐惧症

Y. J. Tan, K. Juliana, N. Manohararaj
{"title":"神经学的信心:教育工作者如何帮助初级医生对抗神经恐惧症","authors":"Y. J. Tan, K. Juliana, N. Manohararaj","doi":"10.4038/seajme.v16i2.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To study factors influencing junior doctors’ confidence when managing neurological conditions.Methods: Using a previously-validated questionnaire, residents of a Singaporean Internal Medicine residency programme were retrospectively-surveyed on their confidence when managing neurological conditions against a 6-point Likert scale. Those who considered themselves confident were compared against those who did not, studying factors contributing to differences in their confidence.Results: 54% (94) of eligible residents completed the survey, of which only 58% felt confident when surveyed, and tended to report adequate interaction with neurologists (69% vs 31%, p = 0.004) and patients (75% vs 24%, p = 0.0001), and that the training material (75% vs 44%, p = 0.023) and bedside teaching were adequate (69% vs 38%, p = 0.026). Of note, graduates from the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, and Australia reported feeling less-than-confident immediately upon graduation (31% vs 6%, p = 0.043). However, during graduate medical training, those who experienced improvement in their confidence tended to be males (46% vs 23%, p = 0.024), and were likelier to have received adequate training material (41% vs 20%, p = 0.032) and bedside teaching (67% vs 46%, p = 0.035).Conclusion: Low confidence prevails amongst junior doctors when managing neurological conditions. Female trainees, and graduates of medical schools in culturally-different countries are likelier to require increased organizational support. Equity within the medical training framework is also vital for building their confidence.","PeriodicalId":233669,"journal":{"name":"South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confidence in Neurology: how Educators can help Junior Doctors fight Neurophobia\",\"authors\":\"Y. J. Tan, K. Juliana, N. Manohararaj\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/seajme.v16i2.515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To study factors influencing junior doctors’ confidence when managing neurological conditions.Methods: Using a previously-validated questionnaire, residents of a Singaporean Internal Medicine residency programme were retrospectively-surveyed on their confidence when managing neurological conditions against a 6-point Likert scale. Those who considered themselves confident were compared against those who did not, studying factors contributing to differences in their confidence.Results: 54% (94) of eligible residents completed the survey, of which only 58% felt confident when surveyed, and tended to report adequate interaction with neurologists (69% vs 31%, p = 0.004) and patients (75% vs 24%, p = 0.0001), and that the training material (75% vs 44%, p = 0.023) and bedside teaching were adequate (69% vs 38%, p = 0.026). Of note, graduates from the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, and Australia reported feeling less-than-confident immediately upon graduation (31% vs 6%, p = 0.043). However, during graduate medical training, those who experienced improvement in their confidence tended to be males (46% vs 23%, p = 0.024), and were likelier to have received adequate training material (41% vs 20%, p = 0.032) and bedside teaching (67% vs 46%, p = 0.035).Conclusion: Low confidence prevails amongst junior doctors when managing neurological conditions. Female trainees, and graduates of medical schools in culturally-different countries are likelier to require increased organizational support. Equity within the medical training framework is also vital for building their confidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v16i2.515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v16i2.515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨影响初级医生治疗神经系统疾病信心的因素。方法:使用先前验证过的问卷,对新加坡内科住院医师计划的住院医师进行回顾性调查,调查他们在管理神经系统疾病时对6分李克特量表的信心。研究人员将那些认为自己自信的人与那些不自信的人进行比较,研究导致他们自信差异的因素。结果:54%(94)的合格住院医师完成了调查,其中只有58%的人在调查时感到自信,并且倾向于报告与神经科医生(69%对31%,p = 0.004)和患者(75%对24%,p = 0.0001)的充分互动,并且培训材料(75%对44%,p = 0.023)和床边教学是充分的(69%对38%,p = 0.026)。值得注意的是,来自英国、爱尔兰共和国和澳大利亚的毕业生在毕业后立即感到不那么自信(31%对6%,p = 0.043)。然而,在研究生医学培训期间,那些经历信心改善的人往往是男性(46%对23%,p = 0.024),并且更有可能接受了足够的培训材料(41%对20%,p = 0.032)和床边教学(67%对46%,p = 0.035)。结论:初级医生在处理神经系统疾病时普遍存在自信心不足的问题。女性受训人员和文化不同国家的医学院毕业生更可能需要更多的组织支持。医疗培训框架内的公平对建立她们的信心也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Confidence in Neurology: how Educators can help Junior Doctors fight Neurophobia
Aim: To study factors influencing junior doctors’ confidence when managing neurological conditions.Methods: Using a previously-validated questionnaire, residents of a Singaporean Internal Medicine residency programme were retrospectively-surveyed on their confidence when managing neurological conditions against a 6-point Likert scale. Those who considered themselves confident were compared against those who did not, studying factors contributing to differences in their confidence.Results: 54% (94) of eligible residents completed the survey, of which only 58% felt confident when surveyed, and tended to report adequate interaction with neurologists (69% vs 31%, p = 0.004) and patients (75% vs 24%, p = 0.0001), and that the training material (75% vs 44%, p = 0.023) and bedside teaching were adequate (69% vs 38%, p = 0.026). Of note, graduates from the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, and Australia reported feeling less-than-confident immediately upon graduation (31% vs 6%, p = 0.043). However, during graduate medical training, those who experienced improvement in their confidence tended to be males (46% vs 23%, p = 0.024), and were likelier to have received adequate training material (41% vs 20%, p = 0.032) and bedside teaching (67% vs 46%, p = 0.035).Conclusion: Low confidence prevails amongst junior doctors when managing neurological conditions. Female trainees, and graduates of medical schools in culturally-different countries are likelier to require increased organizational support. Equity within the medical training framework is also vital for building their confidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation vs Video-Assisted Learning on Retentivity of Clinical Competency and Knowledge of Basic Airway Devices in Medical Students: A Preliminary Study Exploring Communication Approaches in Medication Consultations for Generation Z: a Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Two-Way and One-Way Methods Smartphone usage among Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery students at the University of Papua New Guinea: A survey The Imperative of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in the South-east Asian (SEA) Region Learning Strategies among Medical Students in a selected University in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1