医疗补助扩大-为什么各州要重新评估是否扩大资格?

Russell S. Autry
{"title":"医疗补助扩大-为什么各州要重新评估是否扩大资格?","authors":"Russell S. Autry","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3291808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2018 U.S. mid-term elections saw three additional states vote to expand their Medicaid eligibility, bringing the total to 35 states plus the District of Columbia. So why are states continuing to expand? In this paper, I review four primary reasons for this. Foremost, healthcare is a top issue for most voters. I also examine how the state costs of expanding are not nearly as high as they seem when you factor in ancillary factors. Further, the paper highlights the plight of rural healthcare and how Medicaid expansion can help. Lastly, I review how states can take advantage of alternative expansion waivers to craft a unique expansion solution that works for them.","PeriodicalId":441838,"journal":{"name":"Geographic Health Economics eJournal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicaid Expansion – Why States Are Reevaluating Whether to Expand Eligibility?\",\"authors\":\"Russell S. Autry\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3291808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2018 U.S. mid-term elections saw three additional states vote to expand their Medicaid eligibility, bringing the total to 35 states plus the District of Columbia. So why are states continuing to expand? In this paper, I review four primary reasons for this. Foremost, healthcare is a top issue for most voters. I also examine how the state costs of expanding are not nearly as high as they seem when you factor in ancillary factors. Further, the paper highlights the plight of rural healthcare and how Medicaid expansion can help. Lastly, I review how states can take advantage of alternative expansion waivers to craft a unique expansion solution that works for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographic Health Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographic Health Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3291808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographic Health Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3291808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2018年美国中期选举中,又有三个州投票决定扩大其医疗补助资格,使总数达到35个州加上哥伦比亚特区。那么,为什么各州还在继续扩张呢?在本文中,我回顾了造成这种情况的四个主要原因。最重要的是,医疗保健是大多数选民最关心的问题。我还研究了当你考虑到辅助因素时,扩张的国家成本如何不像看起来那么高。此外,论文还强调了农村医疗保健的困境,以及扩大医疗补助计划的帮助。最后,我回顾了各州如何利用可选择的扩展豁免来制定适合他们的独特扩展解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medicaid Expansion – Why States Are Reevaluating Whether to Expand Eligibility?
The 2018 U.S. mid-term elections saw three additional states vote to expand their Medicaid eligibility, bringing the total to 35 states plus the District of Columbia. So why are states continuing to expand? In this paper, I review four primary reasons for this. Foremost, healthcare is a top issue for most voters. I also examine how the state costs of expanding are not nearly as high as they seem when you factor in ancillary factors. Further, the paper highlights the plight of rural healthcare and how Medicaid expansion can help. Lastly, I review how states can take advantage of alternative expansion waivers to craft a unique expansion solution that works for them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adoption of Mobile Money for Healthcare Utilisation and Spending in Rural Ghana The Determinants of Physicians’ Location Choice: Understanding the Rural Shortage Does Universal Health Coverage at Early Age Reduce Medical Needs at Later Age? Evidence from Vietnam How Reliable Are the Health Responses of Elders? Evidence from India Mortality in Midlife for Subgroups in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1