{"title":"重负载下定时器控制令牌传递协议的吞吐量分析","authors":"J. Pang, F. Tobagi","doi":"10.1109/INFCOM.1988.12993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To support real-time applications on a local area network, some recently proposed standards, such as the IEEE 802.4 token bus standard and FDDI, use timers to control station access of the channel in addition to a basic token-passing protocol. The major reason for incorporating the timing mechanism is to avoid excessively long cycles in token-passing that can disrupt real-time services for packetized voice and real-time control. Nevertheless, the timing mechanism is flexible enough to provide priority among non-real-time traffic as well. The authors present an analysis of the throughput performance of the timer-controlled token-passing protocol under heavy load and a few other assumptions. The analysis not only reveals the priority structure of the protocol but also some salient features that render the protocol more favorable than other cycle-limiting schemes (e.g., fixed-maximum channel access per cycle).<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":436217,"journal":{"name":"IEEE INFOCOM '88,Seventh Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communcations Societies. Networks: Evolution or Revolution?","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Throughput analysis of a timer-controlled token-passing protocol under heavy load\",\"authors\":\"J. Pang, F. Tobagi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFCOM.1988.12993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To support real-time applications on a local area network, some recently proposed standards, such as the IEEE 802.4 token bus standard and FDDI, use timers to control station access of the channel in addition to a basic token-passing protocol. The major reason for incorporating the timing mechanism is to avoid excessively long cycles in token-passing that can disrupt real-time services for packetized voice and real-time control. Nevertheless, the timing mechanism is flexible enough to provide priority among non-real-time traffic as well. The authors present an analysis of the throughput performance of the timer-controlled token-passing protocol under heavy load and a few other assumptions. The analysis not only reveals the priority structure of the protocol but also some salient features that render the protocol more favorable than other cycle-limiting schemes (e.g., fixed-maximum channel access per cycle).<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":436217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE INFOCOM '88,Seventh Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communcations Societies. Networks: Evolution or Revolution?\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE INFOCOM '88,Seventh Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communcations Societies. Networks: Evolution or Revolution?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.1988.12993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE INFOCOM '88,Seventh Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communcations Societies. Networks: Evolution or Revolution?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.1988.12993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Throughput analysis of a timer-controlled token-passing protocol under heavy load
To support real-time applications on a local area network, some recently proposed standards, such as the IEEE 802.4 token bus standard and FDDI, use timers to control station access of the channel in addition to a basic token-passing protocol. The major reason for incorporating the timing mechanism is to avoid excessively long cycles in token-passing that can disrupt real-time services for packetized voice and real-time control. Nevertheless, the timing mechanism is flexible enough to provide priority among non-real-time traffic as well. The authors present an analysis of the throughput performance of the timer-controlled token-passing protocol under heavy load and a few other assumptions. The analysis not only reveals the priority structure of the protocol but also some salient features that render the protocol more favorable than other cycle-limiting schemes (e.g., fixed-maximum channel access per cycle).<>