{"title":"竞选资金和第二箱:一个悬而未决的问题","authors":"D. Falcão, Tiago Augustini de Lima","doi":"10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.111-128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper had as its field of analysis and objective the history of the electoral campaign financing institute in Brazil and its significant changes in the face of the fight against corruption and money laundering through slush fund in the context of the elections. The methodology chosen was deductive and bibliographic review. The subsequent legislative change has already generated positive impacts both in the 2018 general elections and in the 2020 municipal elections. However, the Superior Electoral Court, through an information system, found that in the 2020 elections there was a deviation, possibly of electoral slush fund, as they are still under analysis in the Court, in the amount of more than R $ 588 million. Therefore, the difficulty involved in investigations related to electoral slush fund is the possibility of tracing the origin of the illicit money and the improvement in party transparency. Key-words: Financing Electoral; Slush Fund; Elections; Corruption","PeriodicalId":299944,"journal":{"name":"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O FINANCIAMENTO DE CAMPANHAS ELEITORAIS E O CAIXA DOIS: UM PROBLEMA EM ABERTO\",\"authors\":\"D. Falcão, Tiago Augustini de Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.111-128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper had as its field of analysis and objective the history of the electoral campaign financing institute in Brazil and its significant changes in the face of the fight against corruption and money laundering through slush fund in the context of the elections. The methodology chosen was deductive and bibliographic review. The subsequent legislative change has already generated positive impacts both in the 2018 general elections and in the 2020 municipal elections. However, the Superior Electoral Court, through an information system, found that in the 2020 elections there was a deviation, possibly of electoral slush fund, as they are still under analysis in the Court, in the amount of more than R $ 588 million. Therefore, the difficulty involved in investigations related to electoral slush fund is the possibility of tracing the origin of the illicit money and the improvement in party transparency. Key-words: Financing Electoral; Slush Fund; Elections; Corruption\",\"PeriodicalId\":299944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.111-128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.111-128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的分析和客观领域是巴西竞选筹资机构的历史及其在选举背景下打击腐败和通过秘密资金洗钱的斗争中发生的重大变化。所选择的方法是演绎法和文献回顾法。随后的立法变化已经在2018年的大选和2020年的市政选举中产生了积极的影响。然而,高等选举法院通过一个信息系统发现,在2020年的选举中,有超过5.88亿雷亚尔的偏差,可能是选举秘密资金,法院仍在分析中。因此,选举资金调查的难点在于追查非法资金的来源和提高政党的透明性。关键词:选举融资;行贿基金;选举;腐败
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O FINANCIAMENTO DE CAMPANHAS ELEITORAIS E O CAIXA DOIS: UM PROBLEMA EM ABERTO
This paper had as its field of analysis and objective the history of the electoral campaign financing institute in Brazil and its significant changes in the face of the fight against corruption and money laundering through slush fund in the context of the elections. The methodology chosen was deductive and bibliographic review. The subsequent legislative change has already generated positive impacts both in the 2018 general elections and in the 2020 municipal elections. However, the Superior Electoral Court, through an information system, found that in the 2020 elections there was a deviation, possibly of electoral slush fund, as they are still under analysis in the Court, in the amount of more than R $ 588 million. Therefore, the difficulty involved in investigations related to electoral slush fund is the possibility of tracing the origin of the illicit money and the improvement in party transparency. Key-words: Financing Electoral; Slush Fund; Elections; Corruption
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MULTI-OFFICE INCUMBENCY ADVANTAGE: POLITICAL CAREERS IN BRAZIL A CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DA REFORMA DA PREVIDÊNCIA DE 2003: COMO DECIDIRAM A CCJC E O STF? INDICADOR DE SIMILARIDADE DO DISCURSO PARLAMENTAR: ANÁLISE DO COMPORTAMENTO DAS COALIZÕES PARTIDÁRIAS IMPACTOS NA REPRESENTAÇÃO FEMININA DA CÂMARA DOS DEPUTADOS E DAS ASSEMBLEIAS LEGISLATIVAS COM ADOÇÃO DO DISTRITÃO QUEM RELATA? O PERFIL DOS RELATORES NA CDH DO SENADO FEDERAL (2005-2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1