好,坏,还是丑?Ebay上撤销行为的实证研究

Shun Ye, G. Gao, S. Viswanathan
{"title":"好,坏,还是丑?Ebay上撤销行为的实证研究","authors":"Shun Ye, G. Gao, S. Viswanathan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1664822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates a crucial aspect of the reputation mechanism design in electronic markets – the ability of buyers and sellers to revoke or mutually withdraw negative feedback and ratings. Based on an analysis of recent changes in eBay’s feedback mechanism design, we find that the two-way reputation system enables certain sellers to behave opportunistically by revoking negative feedbacks they receive. This makes the reputation system less effective in discerning the quality of sellers. We also find that changes in the reputation system have a significant influence on these sellers’ behaviors. After eBay’s ban on revoking, sellers exert more effort to improve the quality of their transactions. Our findings support the moral hazard assumption regarding seller’s strategic behavior. We discuss the implications of the above findings for reputation mechanism design and practice.","PeriodicalId":142280,"journal":{"name":"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Good, the Bad, or the Ugly? An Empirical Investigation of Revoking Behavior on Ebay\",\"authors\":\"Shun Ye, G. Gao, S. Viswanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1664822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates a crucial aspect of the reputation mechanism design in electronic markets – the ability of buyers and sellers to revoke or mutually withdraw negative feedback and ratings. Based on an analysis of recent changes in eBay’s feedback mechanism design, we find that the two-way reputation system enables certain sellers to behave opportunistically by revoking negative feedbacks they receive. This makes the reputation system less effective in discerning the quality of sellers. We also find that changes in the reputation system have a significant influence on these sellers’ behaviors. After eBay’s ban on revoking, sellers exert more effort to improve the quality of their transactions. Our findings support the moral hazard assumption regarding seller’s strategic behavior. We discuss the implications of the above findings for reputation mechanism design and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1664822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1664822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨了电子市场中声誉机制设计的一个重要方面——买卖双方撤销或相互撤销负面反馈和评级的能力。通过对近期eBay反馈机制设计变化的分析,我们发现双向信誉系统使某些卖家能够通过撤销他们收到的负面反馈来投机行为。这使得信誉系统在辨别卖家质量方面的效率降低。我们还发现,声誉体系的变化对这些卖家的行为有显著的影响。在eBay禁止撤销交易后,卖家更加努力地提高交易质量。我们的研究结果支持卖方战略行为的道德风险假设。我们讨论了上述研究结果对声誉机制设计和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Good, the Bad, or the Ugly? An Empirical Investigation of Revoking Behavior on Ebay
This study investigates a crucial aspect of the reputation mechanism design in electronic markets – the ability of buyers and sellers to revoke or mutually withdraw negative feedback and ratings. Based on an analysis of recent changes in eBay’s feedback mechanism design, we find that the two-way reputation system enables certain sellers to behave opportunistically by revoking negative feedbacks they receive. This makes the reputation system less effective in discerning the quality of sellers. We also find that changes in the reputation system have a significant influence on these sellers’ behaviors. After eBay’s ban on revoking, sellers exert more effort to improve the quality of their transactions. Our findings support the moral hazard assumption regarding seller’s strategic behavior. We discuss the implications of the above findings for reputation mechanism design and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Controlling Failure Perceptions Affects Performance: Evidence from a Field Experiment The Regulatory Observer Effect: Evidence from SEC Investigations The Doctor will See You Elsewhere: Enterprise Information Systems and the Changing Control of Firm Activities Audited Financial Reporting and Voluntary Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reports Servicers and Mortgage-Backed Securities Default: Theory and Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1