M. Awrangjeb, J. D. C. Rodrigues, Bela Stantic, V. Estivill-Castro
{"title":"酒精受试者识别的脑电信号分类方法的比较","authors":"M. Awrangjeb, J. D. C. Rodrigues, Bela Stantic, V. Estivill-Castro","doi":"10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electroencephalogram (EEG) signal, which records the electrical activity in the brain, is useful for assessing the mental state of the alcoholic subject. Since the public release of an EEG dataset by the University of California, Irvine, there have been many attempts to classify the EEG signals of alcoholic’ and ‘healthy’ subjects. These classification methods are hard to compare as they use different subsets of the dataset and many of their algorithmic settings are unknown. The comparison of their published results using the inconsistent and unknown information is unfair. This paper attempts a fair comparison by presenting a level playing field where a public subset of the dataset is employed with known algorithmic settings. Two recently proposed high performing EEG signal classification methods are implemented with different classifiers and cross-validation techniques. While compared it is observed that the wavelet packet decomposition method with the Naïve Bayes classifier and the k-fold cross validation technique outperforms the other method.","PeriodicalId":164317,"journal":{"name":"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fair comparison of the EEG signal classification methods for alcoholic subject identification\",\"authors\":\"M. Awrangjeb, J. D. C. Rodrigues, Bela Stantic, V. Estivill-Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The electroencephalogram (EEG) signal, which records the electrical activity in the brain, is useful for assessing the mental state of the alcoholic subject. Since the public release of an EEG dataset by the University of California, Irvine, there have been many attempts to classify the EEG signals of alcoholic’ and ‘healthy’ subjects. These classification methods are hard to compare as they use different subsets of the dataset and many of their algorithmic settings are unknown. The comparison of their published results using the inconsistent and unknown information is unfair. This paper attempts a fair comparison by presenting a level playing field where a public subset of the dataset is employed with known algorithmic settings. Two recently proposed high performing EEG signal classification methods are implemented with different classifiers and cross-validation techniques. While compared it is observed that the wavelet packet decomposition method with the Naïve Bayes classifier and the k-fold cross validation technique outperforms the other method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
脑电图(EEG)信号记录了大脑中的电活动,对评估酗酒者的精神状态很有用。自从加州大学欧文分校(University of California, Irvine)公开发布脑电图数据集以来,已经有很多人尝试对“酗酒者”和“健康者”的脑电图信号进行分类。这些分类方法很难比较,因为它们使用的是数据集的不同子集,而且它们的许多算法设置是未知的。使用不一致和未知的信息来比较他们发表的结果是不公平的。本文试图通过提供一个公平的竞争环境来进行公平的比较,其中数据集的公共子集与已知的算法设置一起使用。采用不同的分类器和交叉验证技术实现了两种最新提出的高效脑电信号分类方法。通过与Naïve贝叶斯分类器和k-fold交叉验证技术进行比较,发现小波包分解方法优于其他方法。
A fair comparison of the EEG signal classification methods for alcoholic subject identification
The electroencephalogram (EEG) signal, which records the electrical activity in the brain, is useful for assessing the mental state of the alcoholic subject. Since the public release of an EEG dataset by the University of California, Irvine, there have been many attempts to classify the EEG signals of alcoholic’ and ‘healthy’ subjects. These classification methods are hard to compare as they use different subsets of the dataset and many of their algorithmic settings are unknown. The comparison of their published results using the inconsistent and unknown information is unfair. This paper attempts a fair comparison by presenting a level playing field where a public subset of the dataset is employed with known algorithmic settings. Two recently proposed high performing EEG signal classification methods are implemented with different classifiers and cross-validation techniques. While compared it is observed that the wavelet packet decomposition method with the Naïve Bayes classifier and the k-fold cross validation technique outperforms the other method.