尼日利亚的外交政策、区域义务和不断的订单关闭

Chukwuemeka Enyiazu
{"title":"尼日利亚的外交政策、区域义务和不断的订单关闭","authors":"Chukwuemeka Enyiazu","doi":"10.53982/jcird.2022.0302.04-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colonialism destroyed Africa’s long-standing intra-African trade. Hence, at independence there was a move for regional integration to diversify Africa’s economy. Nigeria had been at the driving seat of Africa’s regional integration. In West Africa, Nigeria pioneered the formation of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in 1975. Though Africa has 21.2% of the global landmass and 13.7% of world population, its share of global economic activities is a meagre 2.6%. Its intratrade is 12%, paralleled to an average of 53.5% in other regions of the world. However, Nigeria over time has engaged in anti-trade policies like border closure, the latest being on 20 August 2019, three months after signing the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA). This has caused ripples within Nigeria, West Africa and Africa at large. This study interrogates Nigeria’s constant border closures, with questions on whether it is in Nigeria’s national interest and if its objective were achieved? The study uses the Regional Leader Role framework of analysis, a sub-set of National Role theory (NRC). The study is a qualitative and non-experimental study and is based on the single case ex-post-facto (after-the-fact) design. Documentary method of data collection is used. The study concludes that Nigeria with over 1,499 illegal land routes into the country, cannot even ‘close’ its border, hence border closure is a lose-lose policy for Nigeria and recommends collaborative actions with her neighbours, the strengthening of border and ports infrastructures as the way forward.","PeriodicalId":168045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy","volume":"448 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nigeria’s Foreign Policy, Regional Obligations and Constant Order Closures\",\"authors\":\"Chukwuemeka Enyiazu\",\"doi\":\"10.53982/jcird.2022.0302.04-j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Colonialism destroyed Africa’s long-standing intra-African trade. Hence, at independence there was a move for regional integration to diversify Africa’s economy. Nigeria had been at the driving seat of Africa’s regional integration. In West Africa, Nigeria pioneered the formation of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in 1975. Though Africa has 21.2% of the global landmass and 13.7% of world population, its share of global economic activities is a meagre 2.6%. Its intratrade is 12%, paralleled to an average of 53.5% in other regions of the world. However, Nigeria over time has engaged in anti-trade policies like border closure, the latest being on 20 August 2019, three months after signing the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA). This has caused ripples within Nigeria, West Africa and Africa at large. This study interrogates Nigeria’s constant border closures, with questions on whether it is in Nigeria’s national interest and if its objective were achieved? The study uses the Regional Leader Role framework of analysis, a sub-set of National Role theory (NRC). The study is a qualitative and non-experimental study and is based on the single case ex-post-facto (after-the-fact) design. Documentary method of data collection is used. The study concludes that Nigeria with over 1,499 illegal land routes into the country, cannot even ‘close’ its border, hence border closure is a lose-lose policy for Nigeria and recommends collaborative actions with her neighbours, the strengthening of border and ports infrastructures as the way forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy\",\"volume\":\"448 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53982/jcird.2022.0302.04-j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/jcird.2022.0302.04-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

殖民主义摧毁了非洲长期存在的内部贸易。因此,在非洲独立时,就有了区域一体化的举措,以使非洲经济多样化。尼日利亚一直处于非洲区域一体化的主导地位。在西非,尼日利亚在1975年率先成立了西非国家经济共同体(西非经共体)。尽管非洲拥有全球21.2%的陆地面积和13.7%的人口,但其在全球经济活动中所占的份额仅为微不足道的2.6%。其内部贸易占12%,与世界其他地区53.5%的平均水平持平。然而,随着时间的推移,尼日利亚采取了关闭边境等反贸易政策,最近一次是在2019年8月20日,即签署《非洲大陆自由贸易协定》(AfCFTA)三个月后。这在尼日利亚、西非和整个非洲引起了涟漪。本研究对尼日利亚不断关闭边境的做法提出质疑,质疑这是否符合尼日利亚的国家利益,以及是否达到了目的?本研究采用了国家角色理论(NRC)的一个子集——区域领导者角色分析框架。该研究是一项定性和非实验研究,并基于单一案例的事后(事后)设计。采用文献资料收集方法。该研究的结论是,尼日利亚有超过1499条非法陆路进入该国,甚至不能“关闭”其边境,因此边境关闭对尼日利亚来说是一个双输的政策,并建议与邻国合作采取行动,加强边境和港口基础设施作为前进的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nigeria’s Foreign Policy, Regional Obligations and Constant Order Closures
Colonialism destroyed Africa’s long-standing intra-African trade. Hence, at independence there was a move for regional integration to diversify Africa’s economy. Nigeria had been at the driving seat of Africa’s regional integration. In West Africa, Nigeria pioneered the formation of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in 1975. Though Africa has 21.2% of the global landmass and 13.7% of world population, its share of global economic activities is a meagre 2.6%. Its intratrade is 12%, paralleled to an average of 53.5% in other regions of the world. However, Nigeria over time has engaged in anti-trade policies like border closure, the latest being on 20 August 2019, three months after signing the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA). This has caused ripples within Nigeria, West Africa and Africa at large. This study interrogates Nigeria’s constant border closures, with questions on whether it is in Nigeria’s national interest and if its objective were achieved? The study uses the Regional Leader Role framework of analysis, a sub-set of National Role theory (NRC). The study is a qualitative and non-experimental study and is based on the single case ex-post-facto (after-the-fact) design. Documentary method of data collection is used. The study concludes that Nigeria with over 1,499 illegal land routes into the country, cannot even ‘close’ its border, hence border closure is a lose-lose policy for Nigeria and recommends collaborative actions with her neighbours, the strengthening of border and ports infrastructures as the way forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cash Transfers to Poor and Vulnerable Households in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis of the Gender Mainstreaming Approach The Nigerian Revolution and the Biafran Civil War The United States-Nigerian Military Co-operation and Adherence to Rules of Engagement by the Nigerian Military during Internal Security Operations, 1999-2020 The Dynamism of International Law in Politics: An Appraisal of Russo-Ukrainian War Nigeria-Rwanda Relations: Strengthening Partnership for Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1