在线市场中合作竞争卖家的信息共享

Guo Li, Hong Zheng, Lin Tian
{"title":"在线市场中合作竞争卖家的信息共享","authors":"Guo Li, Hong Zheng, Lin Tian","doi":"10.1111/POMS.13460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the rapid development of online marketplaces has not only given rise to co-opetitive relationships between sellers but also to information asymmetry between online marketplaces and sellers. This paper studies information sharing in an e-commerce setting consisting of an online marketplace, an upstream manufacturer and a reseller, where the online marketplace possesses superior demand information while the manufacturer and reseller engage in a co-opetitive structure. The reseller procures the products from the manufacturer under a wholesale price contract, and both the manufacturer and the reseller sell the products through the online marketplace by paying a proportional commission fee. We examine the online marketplace's four information-sharing strategies: no information sharing (S1), full information sharing (S2), and partial information sharing with the manufacturer (S3) or with the reseller (S4). Our analysis shows that when the intensity of competition between the manufacturer and reseller is relatively low and the demand variability is moderate, the online marketplace should adopt full information sharing; otherwise, it will prefer to share its demand information with the manufacturer only. Moreover, interestingly, we find that the manufacturer always prefers the scenario of full information sharing to the scenario that endows it with an informational advantage against the reseller. By contrast, the reseller never prefers full information sharing. Depending on the competitive intensity and demand variability, the reseller will either prefer the scenario in which the online marketplace shares the demand information with it only or the scenario in which demand information is shared with the manufacturer only. The rationale for these results hinges on the interactions of the signaling cost, the efficiency effect, and the co-opetitive relationship between the manufacturer and the reseller.","PeriodicalId":119201,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"100","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co-opetitive Sellers\",\"authors\":\"Guo Li, Hong Zheng, Lin Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/POMS.13460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the rapid development of online marketplaces has not only given rise to co-opetitive relationships between sellers but also to information asymmetry between online marketplaces and sellers. This paper studies information sharing in an e-commerce setting consisting of an online marketplace, an upstream manufacturer and a reseller, where the online marketplace possesses superior demand information while the manufacturer and reseller engage in a co-opetitive structure. The reseller procures the products from the manufacturer under a wholesale price contract, and both the manufacturer and the reseller sell the products through the online marketplace by paying a proportional commission fee. We examine the online marketplace's four information-sharing strategies: no information sharing (S1), full information sharing (S2), and partial information sharing with the manufacturer (S3) or with the reseller (S4). Our analysis shows that when the intensity of competition between the manufacturer and reseller is relatively low and the demand variability is moderate, the online marketplace should adopt full information sharing; otherwise, it will prefer to share its demand information with the manufacturer only. Moreover, interestingly, we find that the manufacturer always prefers the scenario of full information sharing to the scenario that endows it with an informational advantage against the reseller. By contrast, the reseller never prefers full information sharing. Depending on the competitive intensity and demand variability, the reseller will either prefer the scenario in which the online marketplace shares the demand information with it only or the scenario in which demand information is shared with the manufacturer only. The rationale for these results hinges on the interactions of the signaling cost, the efficiency effect, and the co-opetitive relationship between the manufacturer and the reseller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"100\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/POMS.13460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/POMS.13460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100

摘要

近年来,网络市场的快速发展不仅导致了卖家之间的合作竞争关系,也导致了网络市场与卖家之间的信息不对称。本文研究了由在线市场、上游制造商和分销商组成的电子商务环境下的信息共享问题,其中在线市场拥有优越的需求信息,制造商和分销商处于合作竞争结构。经销商根据批发价格合同从制造商处采购产品,制造商和经销商通过在线市场支付一定比例的佣金销售产品。我们研究了在线市场的四种信息共享策略:不共享信息(S1)、完全共享信息(S2)以及与制造商或经销商共享部分信息(S3)。分析表明,当制造商和经销商之间的竞争强度较低且需求变化适中时,在线市场应采取充分的信息共享;否则,它宁愿只与制造商共享其需求信息。此外,有趣的是,我们发现制造商总是更喜欢完全信息共享的场景,而不是赋予其对经销商的信息优势的场景。相比之下,经销商从不喜欢完全的信息共享。根据竞争强度和需求可变性的不同,经销商可能更喜欢在线市场只与自己共享需求信息的情况,也可能更喜欢只与制造商共享需求信息的情况。这些结果的基本原理取决于信号成本、效率效应以及制造商和经销商之间的合作竞争关系的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co-opetitive Sellers
In recent years, the rapid development of online marketplaces has not only given rise to co-opetitive relationships between sellers but also to information asymmetry between online marketplaces and sellers. This paper studies information sharing in an e-commerce setting consisting of an online marketplace, an upstream manufacturer and a reseller, where the online marketplace possesses superior demand information while the manufacturer and reseller engage in a co-opetitive structure. The reseller procures the products from the manufacturer under a wholesale price contract, and both the manufacturer and the reseller sell the products through the online marketplace by paying a proportional commission fee. We examine the online marketplace's four information-sharing strategies: no information sharing (S1), full information sharing (S2), and partial information sharing with the manufacturer (S3) or with the reseller (S4). Our analysis shows that when the intensity of competition between the manufacturer and reseller is relatively low and the demand variability is moderate, the online marketplace should adopt full information sharing; otherwise, it will prefer to share its demand information with the manufacturer only. Moreover, interestingly, we find that the manufacturer always prefers the scenario of full information sharing to the scenario that endows it with an informational advantage against the reseller. By contrast, the reseller never prefers full information sharing. Depending on the competitive intensity and demand variability, the reseller will either prefer the scenario in which the online marketplace shares the demand information with it only or the scenario in which demand information is shared with the manufacturer only. The rationale for these results hinges on the interactions of the signaling cost, the efficiency effect, and the co-opetitive relationship between the manufacturer and the reseller.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality and Pricing Decisions for Reward-based Crowdfunding: Effects of Moral Hazard Punish Underperformance with Resting Optimal Dynamic Contracts in the Presence of Switching Cost A reconsideration of the Rothschild-Stiglitz insurance market model by information theory Learning from Law Enforcement Pulp Friction: The Value of Quantity Contracts in Decentralized Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1