{"title":"广义二次价格拍卖中无政府状态的纯粹价格和贝叶斯-纳什价格","authors":"R. Leme, É. Tardos","doi":"10.1109/FOCS.2010.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Generalized Second Price Auction has been the main mechanism used by search companies to auction positions for advertisements on search pages. In this paper we study the social welfare of the Nash equilibria of this game in various models. In the full information setting, socially optimal Nash equilibria are known to exist (i.e., the Price of Stability is 1). This paper is the first to prove bounds on the price of anarchy, and to give any bounds in the Bayesian setting. Our main result is to show that the price of anarchy is small assuming that all bidders play un-dominated strategies. In the full information setting we prove a bound of 1.618 for the price of anarchy for pure Nash equilibria, and a bound of 4 for mixed Nash equilibria. We also prove a bound of 8 for the price of anarchy in the Bayesian setting, when valuations are drawn independently, and the valuation is known only to the bidder and only the distributions used are common knowledge. Our proof exhibits a combinatorial structure of Nash equilibria and uses this structure to bound the price of anarchy. While establishing the structure is simple in the case of pure and mixed Nash equilibria, the extension to the Bayesian setting requires the use of novel combinatorial techniques that can be of independent interest.","PeriodicalId":228365,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"351 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"115","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pure and Bayes-Nash Price of Anarchy for Generalized Second Price Auction\",\"authors\":\"R. Leme, É. Tardos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FOCS.2010.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Generalized Second Price Auction has been the main mechanism used by search companies to auction positions for advertisements on search pages. In this paper we study the social welfare of the Nash equilibria of this game in various models. In the full information setting, socially optimal Nash equilibria are known to exist (i.e., the Price of Stability is 1). This paper is the first to prove bounds on the price of anarchy, and to give any bounds in the Bayesian setting. Our main result is to show that the price of anarchy is small assuming that all bidders play un-dominated strategies. In the full information setting we prove a bound of 1.618 for the price of anarchy for pure Nash equilibria, and a bound of 4 for mixed Nash equilibria. We also prove a bound of 8 for the price of anarchy in the Bayesian setting, when valuations are drawn independently, and the valuation is known only to the bidder and only the distributions used are common knowledge. Our proof exhibits a combinatorial structure of Nash equilibria and uses this structure to bound the price of anarchy. While establishing the structure is simple in the case of pure and mixed Nash equilibria, the extension to the Bayesian setting requires the use of novel combinatorial techniques that can be of independent interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"351 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"115\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2010.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2010.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 115
摘要
广义第二价格拍卖(Generalized Second Price Auction)一直是搜索公司拍卖搜索页面广告位置的主要机制。本文研究了该博弈在不同模型下的纳什均衡的社会福利。在全信息条件下,已知存在社会最优纳什均衡(即稳定价格为1)。本文首次证明了无政府状态价格的界,并给出了贝叶斯条件下的任何界。我们的主要结果是表明,假设所有竞标者都采取非主导策略,无政府状态的代价很小。在完全信息条件下,我们证明了纯纳什均衡的无政府状态的代价界为1.618,混合纳什均衡的无政府状态代价界为4。我们还证明了贝叶斯设置中无政府状态价格的8界,当估值独立绘制时,估值仅为投标人所知,并且仅使用的分布是常识。我们的证明展示了纳什均衡的组合结构,并利用这个结构来限定无政府状态的代价。虽然在纯纳什均衡和混合纳什均衡的情况下建立结构很简单,但扩展到贝叶斯设置需要使用新颖的组合技术,这可能是独立的兴趣。
Pure and Bayes-Nash Price of Anarchy for Generalized Second Price Auction
The Generalized Second Price Auction has been the main mechanism used by search companies to auction positions for advertisements on search pages. In this paper we study the social welfare of the Nash equilibria of this game in various models. In the full information setting, socially optimal Nash equilibria are known to exist (i.e., the Price of Stability is 1). This paper is the first to prove bounds on the price of anarchy, and to give any bounds in the Bayesian setting. Our main result is to show that the price of anarchy is small assuming that all bidders play un-dominated strategies. In the full information setting we prove a bound of 1.618 for the price of anarchy for pure Nash equilibria, and a bound of 4 for mixed Nash equilibria. We also prove a bound of 8 for the price of anarchy in the Bayesian setting, when valuations are drawn independently, and the valuation is known only to the bidder and only the distributions used are common knowledge. Our proof exhibits a combinatorial structure of Nash equilibria and uses this structure to bound the price of anarchy. While establishing the structure is simple in the case of pure and mixed Nash equilibria, the extension to the Bayesian setting requires the use of novel combinatorial techniques that can be of independent interest.