COVID-19大流行对巴西圣保罗州公立大学卫生研究人员学术成果的影响

Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva, Gabriela Chioli Boer, Crislaine de Lima, C. Paiva
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对巴西<s:1>圣保罗州公立大学卫生研究人员学术成果的影响","authors":"Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva, Gabriela Chioli Boer, Crislaine de Lima, C. Paiva","doi":"10.59255/mmed.2022.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Knowledge about what may influence the academic output of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic may help direct efforts to improve individual researchers’ capacity and minimize the impact of other aspects on their academic output.  Aim: To evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the academic production of researchers from public universities in the health area in the State of São Paulo. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey. Health researchers from public universities in the state of São Paulo were evaluated anonymously. Questionnaires addressed sociodemographic and professional characterization of researchers, their academic production and the scientific production related to research projects on COVID-19. Data were collected using the SurveyMonkey® program. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS v.21.0 software; significance was determined by p<0.05. Results: 568 researchers answered all questionnaires. Regarding research partnerships, 297 (50.51%) said they were negatively affected. 231 (39.29%) confirmed difficulty in obtaining financial support. The pandemic changed the way 91.1% of researchers deal with their work routine. The greatest workload of the research team was associated mainly with nurses (46.7%). Biologists have greater chance (OR=4.8) of encountering difficulties in relation to physicians, and researchers from UNIFESP (OR=2.75) are the ones who are more likely to encounter difficulties. FAPESP was the agency that most funded studies related to COVID. Conclusion: These findings reinforce the need to establish funding targets and research incentives, especially for early career researchers. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of the pandemic on researchers’ scientific output over time.","PeriodicalId":319427,"journal":{"name":"Manuscripta Médica","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the academic production of health researchers from public universities of the State of São Paulo, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva, Gabriela Chioli Boer, Crislaine de Lima, C. Paiva\",\"doi\":\"10.59255/mmed.2022.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Knowledge about what may influence the academic output of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic may help direct efforts to improve individual researchers’ capacity and minimize the impact of other aspects on their academic output.  Aim: To evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the academic production of researchers from public universities in the health area in the State of São Paulo. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey. Health researchers from public universities in the state of São Paulo were evaluated anonymously. Questionnaires addressed sociodemographic and professional characterization of researchers, their academic production and the scientific production related to research projects on COVID-19. Data were collected using the SurveyMonkey® program. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS v.21.0 software; significance was determined by p<0.05. Results: 568 researchers answered all questionnaires. Regarding research partnerships, 297 (50.51%) said they were negatively affected. 231 (39.29%) confirmed difficulty in obtaining financial support. The pandemic changed the way 91.1% of researchers deal with their work routine. The greatest workload of the research team was associated mainly with nurses (46.7%). Biologists have greater chance (OR=4.8) of encountering difficulties in relation to physicians, and researchers from UNIFESP (OR=2.75) are the ones who are more likely to encounter difficulties. FAPESP was the agency that most funded studies related to COVID. Conclusion: These findings reinforce the need to establish funding targets and research incentives, especially for early career researchers. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of the pandemic on researchers’ scientific output over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manuscripta Médica\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manuscripta Médica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59255/mmed.2022.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscripta Médica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59255/mmed.2022.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:了解在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间可能影响研究人员学术产出的因素,可能有助于指导提高研究人员个人能力的努力,并最大限度地减少其他方面对其学术产出的影响。目的:评价新冠肺炎疫情对圣保罗州卫生领域公立大学科研人员学术成果的影响。材料与方法:横断面在线调查。来自圣保罗州公立大学的健康研究人员接受了匿名评估。调查问卷涉及研究人员的社会人口学和专业特征、他们的学术成果以及与COVID-19研究项目相关的科学成果。使用SurveyMonkey®程序收集数据。采用IBM-SPSS v.21.0软件进行卡方检验和logistic回归分析;p<0.05为显著性。结果:568名研究人员回答了所有问卷。在研究伙伴关系方面,297人(50.51%)表示受到了负面影响。231人(39.29%)确认难以获得资金支持。疫情改变了91.1%的研究人员处理日常工作的方式。研究团队工作量最大的主要是护士(46.7%)。与医生相比,生物学家有更大的机会(OR=4.8)遇到困难,而来自UNIFESP的研究人员(OR=2.75)更有可能遇到困难。FAPESP是资助与COVID相关研究最多的机构。结论:这些发现加强了建立资助目标和研究激励机制的必要性,特别是对早期职业研究人员而言。需要进行进一步的研究,以确定大流行对研究人员的科学产出的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the academic production of health researchers from public universities of the State of São Paulo, Brazil
Introduction: Knowledge about what may influence the academic output of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic may help direct efforts to improve individual researchers’ capacity and minimize the impact of other aspects on their academic output.  Aim: To evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the academic production of researchers from public universities in the health area in the State of São Paulo. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey. Health researchers from public universities in the state of São Paulo were evaluated anonymously. Questionnaires addressed sociodemographic and professional characterization of researchers, their academic production and the scientific production related to research projects on COVID-19. Data were collected using the SurveyMonkey® program. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS v.21.0 software; significance was determined by p<0.05. Results: 568 researchers answered all questionnaires. Regarding research partnerships, 297 (50.51%) said they were negatively affected. 231 (39.29%) confirmed difficulty in obtaining financial support. The pandemic changed the way 91.1% of researchers deal with their work routine. The greatest workload of the research team was associated mainly with nurses (46.7%). Biologists have greater chance (OR=4.8) of encountering difficulties in relation to physicians, and researchers from UNIFESP (OR=2.75) are the ones who are more likely to encounter difficulties. FAPESP was the agency that most funded studies related to COVID. Conclusion: These findings reinforce the need to establish funding targets and research incentives, especially for early career researchers. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of the pandemic on researchers’ scientific output over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mulheres invisíveis: um relato de experiência sobre a promoção de saúde para as mulheres privadas de liberdade Impacto psicossocial da pandemia de COVID-19 em trabalhadores de uma instituição privada de longa permanência de idosos no interior de São Paulo Abordagem colonoscópica do câncer de cólon: análise retrospectiva de 1061 pacientes Factors associated with happiness and satisfaction with life of medical students in their first four years of a Brazilian private medical school O Efeito Warburg em carcinoma de pulmão de pequenas células: caracterização da expressão de proteínas relacionadas ao metabolismo glicolítico em amostras preservadas em meio líquido
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1