威廉·琼斯爵士(1746-1794)与早期东方主义者对苏非主义的论述

Ahmad Munji, H. Muhammad
{"title":"威廉·琼斯爵士(1746-1794)与早期东方主义者对苏非主义的论述","authors":"Ahmad Munji, H. Muhammad","doi":"10.21580/tos.v10i1.9190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many theories have been proposed to discuss Sufism in terms of its linguistic origins and its role in spiritual knowledge, its concepts and ideas, and cultural influences. Both Muslim and orientalist scholars have offered opposing views on the beginnings of Sufism. Unfortunately, Western orientalists were the first to research this topic, and their ideas greatly influenced later scholars. This study examines how early British orientalists, particularly Sir William Jones, approached the study of Sufism. Jones represents the early development of British orientalism, which started in the form of personal travel accounts long before orientalist societies were established to support them. Only the later ‘experts on the Orient’ created scholarly circles that followed a more objective and systematic approach to studying Muslim cultures, yet often persisted in the erroneous claim that Sufism was an external and foreign element in Islamic culture.","PeriodicalId":256121,"journal":{"name":"Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sir William Jones (1746–1794) and the Early Orientalist Discourse on Sufism\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Munji, H. Muhammad\",\"doi\":\"10.21580/tos.v10i1.9190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many theories have been proposed to discuss Sufism in terms of its linguistic origins and its role in spiritual knowledge, its concepts and ideas, and cultural influences. Both Muslim and orientalist scholars have offered opposing views on the beginnings of Sufism. Unfortunately, Western orientalists were the first to research this topic, and their ideas greatly influenced later scholars. This study examines how early British orientalists, particularly Sir William Jones, approached the study of Sufism. Jones represents the early development of British orientalism, which started in the form of personal travel accounts long before orientalist societies were established to support them. Only the later ‘experts on the Orient’ created scholarly circles that followed a more objective and systematic approach to studying Muslim cultures, yet often persisted in the erroneous claim that Sufism was an external and foreign element in Islamic culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21580/tos.v10i1.9190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/tos.v10i1.9190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们提出了许多理论来讨论苏菲主义的语言起源和它在精神知识中的作用,它的概念和思想,以及文化影响。穆斯林和东方学学者对苏菲主义的起源提出了截然相反的观点。不幸的是,西方的东方学家是第一个研究这个话题的人,他们的观点极大地影响了后来的学者。本研究考察了早期英国东方学家,特别是威廉·琼斯爵士,是如何接触苏非主义研究的。琼斯代表了英国东方学的早期发展,早在东方学协会成立之前,它就以个人旅行记录的形式开始了。只有后来的“东方专家”创造了一个学术圈,遵循一种更客观和系统的方法来研究穆斯林文化,但经常坚持错误的主张,即苏菲主义是伊斯兰文化中的外部和外来因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sir William Jones (1746–1794) and the Early Orientalist Discourse on Sufism
Many theories have been proposed to discuss Sufism in terms of its linguistic origins and its role in spiritual knowledge, its concepts and ideas, and cultural influences. Both Muslim and orientalist scholars have offered opposing views on the beginnings of Sufism. Unfortunately, Western orientalists were the first to research this topic, and their ideas greatly influenced later scholars. This study examines how early British orientalists, particularly Sir William Jones, approached the study of Sufism. Jones represents the early development of British orientalism, which started in the form of personal travel accounts long before orientalist societies were established to support them. Only the later ‘experts on the Orient’ created scholarly circles that followed a more objective and systematic approach to studying Muslim cultures, yet often persisted in the erroneous claim that Sufism was an external and foreign element in Islamic culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ḥamzah Fanṣūrī’s Contextual Analogies: Wujūdiyya Teaching in Malay 16th Century The Role and Significance of Taṣawwuf in Modern-Day Crisis Sufistic Approach in Understanding Hadith: Ḥakīm al-Tirmidhī’s Viewpoint Finding God’s Way: Spiritual Well-Being on the People Who Do Tirakat Mlaku The Urgency of Spiritual Healing during the Coronavirus Outbreak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1