{"title":"瓦里安真梁直线加速器调试及性能评价","authors":"Bidisha Dutta, Shrutisikha Goswami, Sushmita Moran, Phulkumari Talukdar","doi":"10.4103/jrmt.jrmt_11_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to present a report on the commissioning results of the Varian TrueBeam machine with available photon energies so that it can benefit medical physicists during the entire commissioning process. Subjects and Methods: All tests were performed as per the recommendation of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. The beam profiles and percentage depth dose of both photon and electron beams were measured with Sun nuclear Radiation Field Analyzer and 0.125 cc ionization chamber. Output accuracy and consistency of photon and electron beams were measured using 0.6 cc cylindrical ionization chamber and 0.350 cc parallel plate ionization chamber, respectively. To measure the congruency of radiation and optical field and isocenter check with respect to gantry, collimator, and couch, self-developed films were used. Results: Isocenter shift due to gantry, collimator, and couch, rotation was found to be within ± 2-mm diameter circle. Congruency of optical and radiation fields was measured for symmetric fields 5 cm × 5 cm, 10 cm × 10 cm, 20 cm × 20 cm, and 30 cm × 30 cm for all available energy and was within ± 2 mm. Dosimetric leaf gap value for the multi-leaf collimator was measured with 0.125 cc ionization chamber and values are −0.853 mm, −1.106 mm, −1.097 mm, −0.765 mm, and −1.005 mm for energies 6 MV, 10 MV, 15 MV, 6 flattening filter free (FFF), and 10 FFF, respectively. Conclusions: All electrical, mechanical, dosimetric, and safety measurement were found to be within permissible limits. Before clinical use, the beam data are crosschecked with point dosimetry, portal dosimetry, and MapCHECK two-dimensional detector array and results are within tolerance.","PeriodicalId":319549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Medicine in the Tropics","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commissioning and performance evaluation of varian truebeam linear accelerator\",\"authors\":\"Bidisha Dutta, Shrutisikha Goswami, Sushmita Moran, Phulkumari Talukdar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrmt.jrmt_11_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of this study is to present a report on the commissioning results of the Varian TrueBeam machine with available photon energies so that it can benefit medical physicists during the entire commissioning process. Subjects and Methods: All tests were performed as per the recommendation of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. The beam profiles and percentage depth dose of both photon and electron beams were measured with Sun nuclear Radiation Field Analyzer and 0.125 cc ionization chamber. Output accuracy and consistency of photon and electron beams were measured using 0.6 cc cylindrical ionization chamber and 0.350 cc parallel plate ionization chamber, respectively. To measure the congruency of radiation and optical field and isocenter check with respect to gantry, collimator, and couch, self-developed films were used. Results: Isocenter shift due to gantry, collimator, and couch, rotation was found to be within ± 2-mm diameter circle. Congruency of optical and radiation fields was measured for symmetric fields 5 cm × 5 cm, 10 cm × 10 cm, 20 cm × 20 cm, and 30 cm × 30 cm for all available energy and was within ± 2 mm. Dosimetric leaf gap value for the multi-leaf collimator was measured with 0.125 cc ionization chamber and values are −0.853 mm, −1.106 mm, −1.097 mm, −0.765 mm, and −1.005 mm for energies 6 MV, 10 MV, 15 MV, 6 flattening filter free (FFF), and 10 FFF, respectively. Conclusions: All electrical, mechanical, dosimetric, and safety measurement were found to be within permissible limits. Before clinical use, the beam data are crosschecked with point dosimetry, portal dosimetry, and MapCHECK two-dimensional detector array and results are within tolerance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Medicine in the Tropics\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Medicine in the Tropics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrmt.jrmt_11_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Medicine in the Tropics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrmt.jrmt_11_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是报告瓦里安TrueBeam机器的可用光子能量的调试结果,以便在整个调试过程中为医学物理学家提供帮助。试验对象和方法:所有试验均按照原子能管理委员会的建议进行。用太阳核辐射场分析仪和0.125 cc电离室测量了光子和电子束的光束轮廓和百分比深度剂量。采用0.6 cc圆柱电离室和0.350 cc平行板电离室分别测量了光子和电子束的输出精度和一致性。为了测量辐射光场的一致性,并对龙门、准直器和工作台进行等心检查,使用了自显影胶片。结果:龙门、准直器、工作台等中心移位,旋转范围在±2mm直径圆内。在5 cm × 5 cm、10 cm × 10 cm、20 cm × 20 cm和30 cm × 30 cm的对称场中,测量所有可用能量的光场和辐射场的一致性,一致性在±2 mm以内。在0.125 cc电离室中测量了多叶准直器的剂量学叶间隙值,分别为- 0.853 mm、- 1.106 mm、- 1.097 mm、- 0.765 mm和- 1.005 mm,能量分别为6 MV、10 MV、15 MV、6个无压平滤波器(FFF)和10个FFF。结论:所有电气、机械、剂量学和安全测量均在允许范围内。在临床使用前,将光束数据与点剂量法、门静脉剂量法和MapCHECK二维探测器阵列交叉核对,结果在公差范围内。
Commissioning and performance evaluation of varian truebeam linear accelerator
Aim: The aim of this study is to present a report on the commissioning results of the Varian TrueBeam machine with available photon energies so that it can benefit medical physicists during the entire commissioning process. Subjects and Methods: All tests were performed as per the recommendation of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. The beam profiles and percentage depth dose of both photon and electron beams were measured with Sun nuclear Radiation Field Analyzer and 0.125 cc ionization chamber. Output accuracy and consistency of photon and electron beams were measured using 0.6 cc cylindrical ionization chamber and 0.350 cc parallel plate ionization chamber, respectively. To measure the congruency of radiation and optical field and isocenter check with respect to gantry, collimator, and couch, self-developed films were used. Results: Isocenter shift due to gantry, collimator, and couch, rotation was found to be within ± 2-mm diameter circle. Congruency of optical and radiation fields was measured for symmetric fields 5 cm × 5 cm, 10 cm × 10 cm, 20 cm × 20 cm, and 30 cm × 30 cm for all available energy and was within ± 2 mm. Dosimetric leaf gap value for the multi-leaf collimator was measured with 0.125 cc ionization chamber and values are −0.853 mm, −1.106 mm, −1.097 mm, −0.765 mm, and −1.005 mm for energies 6 MV, 10 MV, 15 MV, 6 flattening filter free (FFF), and 10 FFF, respectively. Conclusions: All electrical, mechanical, dosimetric, and safety measurement were found to be within permissible limits. Before clinical use, the beam data are crosschecked with point dosimetry, portal dosimetry, and MapCHECK two-dimensional detector array and results are within tolerance.