改进的不平衡出价检测模型

Gul Polat, Harun Turkoglu, Atilla Damci, Firat Akin
{"title":"改进的不平衡出价检测模型","authors":"Gul Polat, Harun Turkoglu, Atilla Damci, Firat Akin","doi":"10.3311/ccc2019-051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection of unbalanced bids is crucial for owners because selecting an unbalanced bidder as the contractor may bring about cost overruns. There are two main types of unbalanced bids, namely, mathematically and materially unbalanced bid. This study mainly focuses on the second type, where a contractor tends to increase the unit prices of items whose quantity was somehow underrated by the owner’s team. This study proposes a modification to a model that was developed to assist owners in detecting unbalanced bids. The major difference between the proposed model and the previous one lies in the grading system of detecting the unbalanced bids. In the proposed model, eight different grading systems are used in detection of unbalanced bids, whereas the previous model consisted of five grading systems. The final score of each bidder is calculated by assigning weights to these grading systems. Bidders are evaluated not only according to the offered bid prices, but also according to the calculated final scores. The applicability of the proposed approach is presented along with an illustrative example. It was observed that the proposed model detected the unbalanced bid, which attains the lowest final score. The proposed model represents a marked improvement on existing practice and provides owners with a new perspective in detecting unbalanced bids. Armed with such a tool, it may be easier for owners to protect themselves from the risk of unbalanced bids.","PeriodicalId":231420,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Unbalanced Bid Detection Model\",\"authors\":\"Gul Polat, Harun Turkoglu, Atilla Damci, Firat Akin\",\"doi\":\"10.3311/ccc2019-051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detection of unbalanced bids is crucial for owners because selecting an unbalanced bidder as the contractor may bring about cost overruns. There are two main types of unbalanced bids, namely, mathematically and materially unbalanced bid. This study mainly focuses on the second type, where a contractor tends to increase the unit prices of items whose quantity was somehow underrated by the owner’s team. This study proposes a modification to a model that was developed to assist owners in detecting unbalanced bids. The major difference between the proposed model and the previous one lies in the grading system of detecting the unbalanced bids. In the proposed model, eight different grading systems are used in detection of unbalanced bids, whereas the previous model consisted of five grading systems. The final score of each bidder is calculated by assigning weights to these grading systems. Bidders are evaluated not only according to the offered bid prices, but also according to the calculated final scores. The applicability of the proposed approach is presented along with an illustrative example. It was observed that the proposed model detected the unbalanced bid, which attains the lowest final score. The proposed model represents a marked improvement on existing practice and provides owners with a new perspective in detecting unbalanced bids. Armed with such a tool, it may be easier for owners to protect themselves from the risk of unbalanced bids.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3311/ccc2019-051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/ccc2019-051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

检测不平衡投标对业主来说是至关重要的,因为选择一个不平衡的投标人作为承包商可能会导致成本超支。不平衡投标有两种主要类型,即数学上和物质上的不平衡投标。本研究主要关注第二种类型,即承包商倾向于提高业主团队低估数量的项目的单价。本研究提出了一个模型的修改,该模型是为了帮助业主发现不平衡投标而开发的。该模型与现有模型的主要区别在于不平衡投标的分级系统。在该模型中,使用了8种不同的分级系统来检测不平衡投标,而之前的模型由5种分级系统组成。每个投标人的最终得分是通过给这些评分系统分配权重来计算的。对竞标者的评价不仅根据出价,而且根据计算出的最终分数。提出了该方法的适用性,并给出了一个示例。结果表明,该模型能够检测到最终得分最低的不平衡竞价。提出的模型是对现有做法的显著改进,并为业主提供了检测不平衡报价的新视角。有了这样一个工具,业主可能更容易保护自己免受不平衡出价的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved Unbalanced Bid Detection Model
Detection of unbalanced bids is crucial for owners because selecting an unbalanced bidder as the contractor may bring about cost overruns. There are two main types of unbalanced bids, namely, mathematically and materially unbalanced bid. This study mainly focuses on the second type, where a contractor tends to increase the unit prices of items whose quantity was somehow underrated by the owner’s team. This study proposes a modification to a model that was developed to assist owners in detecting unbalanced bids. The major difference between the proposed model and the previous one lies in the grading system of detecting the unbalanced bids. In the proposed model, eight different grading systems are used in detection of unbalanced bids, whereas the previous model consisted of five grading systems. The final score of each bidder is calculated by assigning weights to these grading systems. Bidders are evaluated not only according to the offered bid prices, but also according to the calculated final scores. The applicability of the proposed approach is presented along with an illustrative example. It was observed that the proposed model detected the unbalanced bid, which attains the lowest final score. The proposed model represents a marked improvement on existing practice and provides owners with a new perspective in detecting unbalanced bids. Armed with such a tool, it may be easier for owners to protect themselves from the risk of unbalanced bids.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Input for Hybrid Simulation Modelling Construction Operations What are the Barriers and Drivers Toward BIM Adoption in Nigeria? Ontology Assisted Collaboration Sessions on 4D BIM A Balanced Scorecard for Assessing Automation in Construction Traceability for Built Assets: Proposed Framework for a Digital Record
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1