{"title":"Palkehitus: uurimise, taastamise ja arenguloo selgitamise vajadused Eestis ja maailmas / Relevance of Log Crib Research, Renovation and Development in Estonia and the World","authors":"D. C. Reed","doi":"10.12697/sv.2016.7.180-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1972, I was apprenticed to an elderly mountain man steeped in the traditions of log crib construction. Cyrus Paul Lewis taught me the skills of 18th and 19th century rough and finish carpentry as it pertained to folk architecture. The craft training of log construction added on top of several years experience as a modern day carpenter enabled me to build a company that restored houses and other log buildings all over the United States from 1974 to 2006. In 1978 I continued my formal education in anthropology and preservation specializing in log structures at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. Having read all the authoritative works on log buildings and compared them to what I was learning in the field, it was obvious there were many gaps in the collective body of knowledge concerning the development and dissemination of log crib structures.During a brief first trip to Europe, it was easy to see that the log crib buildings in Alpine and northern Europe in no way resembled the American log cribs erected for three centuries by the settlers arriving on the American shores and those pushing west to establish their farms and build their houses. It became clear American scholarship had a long way to go in understanding the log crib, its development, technology and dissemination throughout the world much less in America. In 2009 a quest to fill in some of the gaps was begun.After four years of intense research with field trips to Turkey, southern Europe and ranging all the way north to the Scandinavian and Baltic countries ringing the Baltic Sea two findings became very clear. First, no one person can possibly conduct the massive research needed to fully understand origins, technology and dissemination of the world's log cribs. Secondly, it was apparent, contrary to what had been declared in former publications, that Europeans did not transfer their log crib technologies intact to the eastern shores of the US. Rather only a small number of scattered details mixed with a few processes of material manufacturing and building commonly used in Europe were configured into what was to become an American log crib style almost from the first settlements.These discoveries bore witness to the fallacy of single or two person research efforts that resulted in broad, sweeping declarations of origins and disseminations concerning log crib technologies. Most authors were not familiar with the professional training needed to fully understand the hands-on traditions of building with logs and have largely missed the facts concerning the developmental history of log buildings in a specific country and the world. Far more collaborative research between the multiple disciplines and experienced master craftsmen is needed.Even in Estonia further studies are needed to determine how the dual-purpose barn-dwelling developed and where it originated. With seven centuries of multiple foreign occupations responsible for bringing in many different types of technologies form their occupiers' homelands, Estonia is a perfect research area for studying and tracking details of development within the country and tracing them back to their origins.Estonia is not the only country where a rich tradition of log construction needs further research. Further Continental and world-wide log crib studies are needed on a global basis. National surveys must be completed and all resulting data shared to a central data base and collated for developmental research to take place. This work is vital to the understanding of the origins, development and disseminations of log crib technologies throughout the world much less the US and the European Continent.The results of multiple global log crib research efforts will have far reaching effects in craft training, log crib technology training, and in reintroducing relative millennia's old technologies in a modern day world rife with toxic fixes that do not work very well in new construction. New restoration techniques of wooden buildings will be learned and culled from the research. Environmental considerations that reduce CO2 levels, green house effects and increase local community cohesiveness all will benefit from global in-depth research efforts to fill in the missing information gaps in log crib development and technologies.In order for all this research to be coordinated, collated and disseminated, a single global organization dedicated to the study of log crib development must be formed. A new organization focused solely on ferreting out log construction histories, developing techniques of restoration, forest management and timber conservation is necessary in part to provide continued introductory and higher level job training for a log crib work force. The research and training is imperative if the world is to maintain and develop additional higher paying jobs, lower taxes, maintain existing log structures, wisely use limited natural resources in an efficient manner and better living conditions for millions of people.","PeriodicalId":245575,"journal":{"name":"Studia Vernacula","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Vernacula","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/sv.2016.7.180-210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1972年,我师从一位深谙木床构造传统的山地老人。赛勒斯·保罗·刘易斯(Cyrus Paul Lewis)教会了我18世纪和19世纪民间建筑中粗加工木工的技能。原木建筑的工艺培训加上几年作为现代木匠的经验,使我能够在1974年至2006年期间在美国各地建立一家修复房屋和其他原木建筑的公司。1978年,我在华盛顿特区的乔治华盛顿大学(George Washington University)继续接受人类学和保存学的正规教育,专攻原木结构。在阅读了所有关于原木建筑的权威著作,并将它们与我在该领域所学的内容进行了比较之后,很明显,关于原木摇篮结构的发展和传播,在集体知识体系中存在许多空白。在第一次短暂的欧洲之旅中,很容易看出阿尔卑斯和北欧的木床建筑与美国的木床完全不同,这些木床是由抵达美国海岸的移民和向西推进建立农场和建造房屋的移民建立的,这些移民建立了三个世纪。很明显,美国学术界在理解原木摇篮方面还有很长的路要走,它的发展、技术和在世界各地的传播更不用说在美国了。2009年,一项填补部分空白的探索开始了。经过四年的深入研究,我们到土耳其、南欧实地考察,并一路北上到环绕波罗的海的斯堪的纳维亚和波罗的海国家,有两个发现变得非常清楚。首先,没有一个人能够进行大规模的研究,以充分了解世界原木床的起源、技术和传播。其次,很明显,与以前的出版物所宣称的相反,欧洲人并没有将他们的原木摇篮技术完整地转移到美国东海岸。相反,只有少量分散的细节与欧洲常用的材料制造和建筑工艺混合在一起,几乎从第一个定居点开始就形成了美国的原木摇篮风格。这些发现证明了个人或两个人的研究努力是错误的,这种努力导致了对原木床技术的起源和传播的广泛、彻底的声明。大多数作者都不熟悉专业培训,无法充分理解用原木建造建筑的实践传统,并且在很大程度上错过了有关特定国家和世界原木建筑发展历史的事实。需要多学科和经验丰富的工匠之间进行更多的合作研究。即使在爱沙尼亚,也需要进行进一步的研究,以确定双重用途的谷仓住宅是如何发展的以及起源于何处。由于七个世纪以来的多种外国占领,从其占领者的祖国带来了许多不同类型的技术,爱沙尼亚是一个完美的研究领域,可以研究和跟踪该国发展的细节,并追溯其起源。爱沙尼亚并不是唯一一个有着丰富的原木建筑传统需要进一步研究的国家。需要在全球基础上对大陆和世界范围内的原木床进行进一步研究。国家调查必须完成,所有结果数据必须与一个中央数据库共享,并加以整理,以便进行发展研究。这项工作对于了解原木床技术在世界各地的起源、发展和传播至关重要,更不用说美国和欧洲大陆。多个全球原木床研究工作的结果将对工艺培训,原木床技术培训以及在现代世界中重新引入相对千年的旧技术产生深远的影响,这些技术充斥着有毒的修复,无法在新建筑中很好地工作。从研究中学习和筛选新的木结构建筑修复技术。减少二氧化碳水平、温室效应和增加当地社区凝聚力的环境考虑都将受益于全球深入的研究工作,以填补原木床开发和技术方面缺失的信息空白。为了协调、整理和传播所有这些研究,必须成立一个专门研究原木摇篮发展的单一全球组织。有必要成立一个新的组织,专门研究原木的建造历史,发展恢复、森林管理和木材保护技术,以便为原木工人提供持续的入门和更高级别的工作培训。 如果世界要维持和发展更多的高薪工作,降低税收,维护现有的原木结构,以有效的方式明智地利用有限的自然资源,并为数百万人提供更好的生活条件,那么研究和培训是必不可少的。 如果世界要维持和发展更多的高薪工作,降低税收,维护现有的原木结构,以有效的方式明智地利用有限的自然资源,并为数百万人提供更好的生活条件,那么研究和培训是必不可少的。
Palkehitus: uurimise, taastamise ja arenguloo selgitamise vajadused Eestis ja maailmas / Relevance of Log Crib Research, Renovation and Development in Estonia and the World
In 1972, I was apprenticed to an elderly mountain man steeped in the traditions of log crib construction. Cyrus Paul Lewis taught me the skills of 18th and 19th century rough and finish carpentry as it pertained to folk architecture. The craft training of log construction added on top of several years experience as a modern day carpenter enabled me to build a company that restored houses and other log buildings all over the United States from 1974 to 2006. In 1978 I continued my formal education in anthropology and preservation specializing in log structures at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. Having read all the authoritative works on log buildings and compared them to what I was learning in the field, it was obvious there were many gaps in the collective body of knowledge concerning the development and dissemination of log crib structures.During a brief first trip to Europe, it was easy to see that the log crib buildings in Alpine and northern Europe in no way resembled the American log cribs erected for three centuries by the settlers arriving on the American shores and those pushing west to establish their farms and build their houses. It became clear American scholarship had a long way to go in understanding the log crib, its development, technology and dissemination throughout the world much less in America. In 2009 a quest to fill in some of the gaps was begun.After four years of intense research with field trips to Turkey, southern Europe and ranging all the way north to the Scandinavian and Baltic countries ringing the Baltic Sea two findings became very clear. First, no one person can possibly conduct the massive research needed to fully understand origins, technology and dissemination of the world's log cribs. Secondly, it was apparent, contrary to what had been declared in former publications, that Europeans did not transfer their log crib technologies intact to the eastern shores of the US. Rather only a small number of scattered details mixed with a few processes of material manufacturing and building commonly used in Europe were configured into what was to become an American log crib style almost from the first settlements.These discoveries bore witness to the fallacy of single or two person research efforts that resulted in broad, sweeping declarations of origins and disseminations concerning log crib technologies. Most authors were not familiar with the professional training needed to fully understand the hands-on traditions of building with logs and have largely missed the facts concerning the developmental history of log buildings in a specific country and the world. Far more collaborative research between the multiple disciplines and experienced master craftsmen is needed.Even in Estonia further studies are needed to determine how the dual-purpose barn-dwelling developed and where it originated. With seven centuries of multiple foreign occupations responsible for bringing in many different types of technologies form their occupiers' homelands, Estonia is a perfect research area for studying and tracking details of development within the country and tracing them back to their origins.Estonia is not the only country where a rich tradition of log construction needs further research. Further Continental and world-wide log crib studies are needed on a global basis. National surveys must be completed and all resulting data shared to a central data base and collated for developmental research to take place. This work is vital to the understanding of the origins, development and disseminations of log crib technologies throughout the world much less the US and the European Continent.The results of multiple global log crib research efforts will have far reaching effects in craft training, log crib technology training, and in reintroducing relative millennia's old technologies in a modern day world rife with toxic fixes that do not work very well in new construction. New restoration techniques of wooden buildings will be learned and culled from the research. Environmental considerations that reduce CO2 levels, green house effects and increase local community cohesiveness all will benefit from global in-depth research efforts to fill in the missing information gaps in log crib development and technologies.In order for all this research to be coordinated, collated and disseminated, a single global organization dedicated to the study of log crib development must be formed. A new organization focused solely on ferreting out log construction histories, developing techniques of restoration, forest management and timber conservation is necessary in part to provide continued introductory and higher level job training for a log crib work force. The research and training is imperative if the world is to maintain and develop additional higher paying jobs, lower taxes, maintain existing log structures, wisely use limited natural resources in an efficient manner and better living conditions for millions of people.