利用导航装置手动输入目的地的分心驾驶测量

M. F. Mohd Siam, A. A. Ab. Rashid, M. Ibrahim, N. Borhan
{"title":"利用导航装置手动输入目的地的分心驾驶测量","authors":"M. F. Mohd Siam, A. A. Ab. Rashid, M. Ibrahim, N. Borhan","doi":"10.56381/jsaem.v3i4.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis paper discusses the measurement of driver distraction for manual destination entry using navigation devices in a simulated traffic environment. 46 participants completed a number of secondary tasks while synchronously conducting the driving activities and performing the detection task. For comparison of the driving scenarios, three scenarios were used which were low speed, high speed, and traffic congestion. Secondary tasks including 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 14, 20 number of characters were assessed in the study. The results of this study showed that participants were more distracted with more demanding tasks to handle the destination entry as compared to baseline. In addition, we also found that participants attended the worst in terms of higher RT in traffic jam scenarios as compared to other two scenarios. This study shows that doing navigation task specifically destination entry while driving is considered as a distracting activity that possibly elevates the risk of a crash. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":286928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distracted Driving Measurement for Manual Destination Entry Using Navigation Device\",\"authors\":\"M. F. Mohd Siam, A. A. Ab. Rashid, M. Ibrahim, N. Borhan\",\"doi\":\"10.56381/jsaem.v3i4.137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThis paper discusses the measurement of driver distraction for manual destination entry using navigation devices in a simulated traffic environment. 46 participants completed a number of secondary tasks while synchronously conducting the driving activities and performing the detection task. For comparison of the driving scenarios, three scenarios were used which were low speed, high speed, and traffic congestion. Secondary tasks including 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 14, 20 number of characters were assessed in the study. The results of this study showed that participants were more distracted with more demanding tasks to handle the destination entry as compared to baseline. In addition, we also found that participants attended the worst in terms of higher RT in traffic jam scenarios as compared to other two scenarios. This study shows that doing navigation task specifically destination entry while driving is considered as a distracting activity that possibly elevates the risk of a crash. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":286928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56381/jsaem.v3i4.137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56381/jsaem.v3i4.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了在模拟交通环境下,利用导航装置测量驾驶员手动进入目的地时的分心度。46名参与者在同步进行驾驶活动和执行检测任务的同时完成了一些次要任务。为了对驾驶场景进行比较,我们使用了低速、高速和交通拥堵三种场景。次要任务包括0、1、2、3、4、5、7、9、14、20个字符。这项研究的结果表明,与基线相比,参与者在处理目的地条目时更容易分心,因为任务要求更高。此外,我们还发现,与其他两种情况相比,参与者在交通拥堵情况下的高RT表现最差。这项研究表明,在驾驶时进行导航任务,特别是目的地输入,被认为是一种分散注意力的活动,可能会增加撞车的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distracted Driving Measurement for Manual Destination Entry Using Navigation Device
This paper discusses the measurement of driver distraction for manual destination entry using navigation devices in a simulated traffic environment. 46 participants completed a number of secondary tasks while synchronously conducting the driving activities and performing the detection task. For comparison of the driving scenarios, three scenarios were used which were low speed, high speed, and traffic congestion. Secondary tasks including 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 14, 20 number of characters were assessed in the study. The results of this study showed that participants were more distracted with more demanding tasks to handle the destination entry as compared to baseline. In addition, we also found that participants attended the worst in terms of higher RT in traffic jam scenarios as compared to other two scenarios. This study shows that doing navigation task specifically destination entry while driving is considered as a distracting activity that possibly elevates the risk of a crash.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Township and Sustainable Home: Public Perceptions A Systematic Review on the Autonomous Emergency Steering Assessments and Tests Methodology in ASEAN Evaluation of SUV Roof Crush Analysis using Alternative Non-Linear Structural Analysis Solver The Influence of Socio-demographics Background on the Driving Behavior: A Short Review Establishment of 3D-printed Child Manikins Using Anthropometric Data of 6- and 10-year-old ASEAN Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1