模糊决策问题下个体决策行为的预测模型

Hsiaoping Yeh
{"title":"模糊决策问题下个体决策行为的预测模型","authors":"Hsiaoping Yeh","doi":"10.30166/PPMR.200307.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most decision problems are inherently fuzzy due to of unable precisely defined or the lack of enough information. Thus these decision problems can properly be formulated by fuzzy sets. Such problems differ from the traditional mathematical programming problem of maximizing a well-defined function over a set of alternatives represented by crisp values. However, when alternatives are represented in terms of fuzzy values, one important question remains: how can one choose one alternative from a given set of alternatives so as to achieve, in some sense, ”the best” overall fuzzy value. Current fuzzy decision making methods do not account for subjective values of the decision maker. In this paper the concept of the decision maker's attitude toward fuzziness is defined and a new fuzzy decision making method is derived. The feasibility and validity of the new method is ascertained through experiments. Benchmarking with the indices of preference reversals revealed by the traditional expected utility theory, the new approach leads to better prediction of individual's actual choices.","PeriodicalId":431367,"journal":{"name":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prediction Model for Individual Decision Making Behavior under Fuzzy Decision Problems\",\"authors\":\"Hsiaoping Yeh\",\"doi\":\"10.30166/PPMR.200307.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most decision problems are inherently fuzzy due to of unable precisely defined or the lack of enough information. Thus these decision problems can properly be formulated by fuzzy sets. Such problems differ from the traditional mathematical programming problem of maximizing a well-defined function over a set of alternatives represented by crisp values. However, when alternatives are represented in terms of fuzzy values, one important question remains: how can one choose one alternative from a given set of alternatives so as to achieve, in some sense, ”the best” overall fuzzy value. Current fuzzy decision making methods do not account for subjective values of the decision maker. In this paper the concept of the decision maker's attitude toward fuzziness is defined and a new fuzzy decision making method is derived. The feasibility and validity of the new method is ascertained through experiments. Benchmarking with the indices of preference reversals revealed by the traditional expected utility theory, the new approach leads to better prediction of individual's actual choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pan-Pacific Management Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pan-Pacific Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30166/PPMR.200307.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30166/PPMR.200307.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于无法精确定义或缺乏足够的信息,大多数决策问题本质上是模糊的。因此,这些决策问题可以用模糊集恰当地表述。这些问题不同于传统的数学规划问题,即在一组由清晰值表示的备选方案上最大化一个定义良好的函数。然而,当备选方案用模糊值表示时,一个重要的问题仍然存在:如何从给定的备选方案集合中选择一个备选方案,以便在某种意义上实现“最佳”的总体模糊值。目前的模糊决策方法没有考虑到决策者的主观价值。本文定义了决策者对模糊性态度的概念,导出了一种新的模糊决策方法。通过实验验证了新方法的可行性和有效性。新方法以传统期望效用理论揭示的偏好逆转指数为基准,可以更好地预测个体的实际选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prediction Model for Individual Decision Making Behavior under Fuzzy Decision Problems
Most decision problems are inherently fuzzy due to of unable precisely defined or the lack of enough information. Thus these decision problems can properly be formulated by fuzzy sets. Such problems differ from the traditional mathematical programming problem of maximizing a well-defined function over a set of alternatives represented by crisp values. However, when alternatives are represented in terms of fuzzy values, one important question remains: how can one choose one alternative from a given set of alternatives so as to achieve, in some sense, ”the best” overall fuzzy value. Current fuzzy decision making methods do not account for subjective values of the decision maker. In this paper the concept of the decision maker's attitude toward fuzziness is defined and a new fuzzy decision making method is derived. The feasibility and validity of the new method is ascertained through experiments. Benchmarking with the indices of preference reversals revealed by the traditional expected utility theory, the new approach leads to better prediction of individual's actual choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact Of Journal Ranking Systems on Emerging Journals and Academic Freedom: How Should Academics Respond? Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Analysis with Dissonance Reduction For Optimistic/Pessimistic Decision Makers The Relationship between Authenticity and the Souvenir Purchase Intent Exploring Anchoring and Communication Effects from Message Manipulation: An Experimental Study about Recycling An Integrated Model of Consumer Involvement Based on Fuzzy Automata
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1