关于违宪例外的可采性问题

S. Barbu, C. Florescu
{"title":"关于违宪例外的可采性问题","authors":"S. Barbu, C. Florescu","doi":"10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to constitutional justice by way of the exception of unconstitutionality is subject to conditions, provided by law and developed in the practice of the Romanian courts of justice and of the Constitutional Court. An exception of unconstitutionality implies a procedural mechanism that must meet the conditions of predictability and clarity, in order to ensure legal certainty and effective access to constitutional litigation. We intend this paper to be a useful tool for litigants and for the courts when they refer to the Constitutional Court with exceptions of unconstitutionality, in terms of a clear delimitation of the powers of the courts of justice and the Constitutional Court.","PeriodicalId":298214,"journal":{"name":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspects concerning the admissibility of the exception of unconstitutionality\",\"authors\":\"S. Barbu, C. Florescu\",\"doi\":\"10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Access to constitutional justice by way of the exception of unconstitutionality is subject to conditions, provided by law and developed in the practice of the Romanian courts of justice and of the Constitutional Court. An exception of unconstitutionality implies a procedural mechanism that must meet the conditions of predictability and clarity, in order to ensure legal certainty and effective access to constitutional litigation. We intend this paper to be a useful tool for litigants and for the courts when they refer to the Constitutional Court with exceptions of unconstitutionality, in terms of a clear delimitation of the powers of the courts of justice and the Constitutional Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过违反宪法的例外情况获得宪法司法的机会,受法律规定的条件的限制,这些条件是罗马尼亚法院和宪法法院在实践中发展起来的。违宪的例外意味着程序机制必须满足可预测性和明确性的条件,以确保法律确定性和有效利用宪法诉讼。我们希望这份文件能够成为诉讼当事人和法院在提及宪法法院时的有用工具,但在明确界定法院和宪法法院的权力方面存在违宪的例外情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspects concerning the admissibility of the exception of unconstitutionality
Access to constitutional justice by way of the exception of unconstitutionality is subject to conditions, provided by law and developed in the practice of the Romanian courts of justice and of the Constitutional Court. An exception of unconstitutionality implies a procedural mechanism that must meet the conditions of predictability and clarity, in order to ensure legal certainty and effective access to constitutional litigation. We intend this paper to be a useful tool for litigants and for the courts when they refer to the Constitutional Court with exceptions of unconstitutionality, in terms of a clear delimitation of the powers of the courts of justice and the Constitutional Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY – A MORAL CONSTRUCT, AN INTELLECTUAL VIRTUE PHOTOVOICE AS A TOOL FOR INCREASING AWARENESS AND PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION IT’S NOT WHAT IT SEEMS! THE MEDIATING ROLE OF SELF-EFFICACY IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRAIT-ANXIETY AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC THE QUESTION OF EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OBTAINED IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AS A RESULT OF ENFORCING NATIONAL SECURITY WARRANTS BY THE ROMANIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (SRI) CHANGING PERCEPTION THROUGH MEDIA BOMBARDMENT AND DEMONIZATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1