将评估者和宗教间和平建设者联系起来

Michelle G. Garred, Rebecca Herrington, E. Hume
{"title":"将评估者和宗教间和平建设者联系起来","authors":"Michelle G. Garred, Rebecca Herrington, E. Hume","doi":"10.1515/9783110624625-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With funding from the GHR Foundation, the Alliance for Peacebuilding (AfP) and its partners CDA Collaborative Learning Projects (CDA) and Search for Common Ground (SFCG), in collaboration with a Global Advisory Council, led the Effective Inter-Religious Action in Peacebuilding Program (EIAP) project between 2015 and 2017.2 The project’s substantive learnings to date are captured in its primary publication: Faith Matters: A Guide for the Designing, Monitoring & Evaluation of Inter-Religious Action for Peace3 (hereafter referred to as the Faith Matters Guide). This chapter complements the Faith Matters Guide by exploring the underlying human learning processes that made the substantive learning possible. In bringing together representatives of two very different stakeholder audiences, evaluators and inter-religious actors, this project set in motion a mutually transformative exchange. Both groups are essential for progress, and yet previous communication and collaboration had been minimal. Therefore this chapter analyses what inter-religious peacebuilders and evaluators learned from each other during EIAP, unpacking the victories, tensions and challenges they encountered, to help illuminate the next phase of effort. The chapter also identifies real-world ways forward in developing evaluation approaches that both evaluators and inter-religious peacebuilders can embrace.4","PeriodicalId":316665,"journal":{"name":"Evaluating Interreligious Peacebuilding and Dialogue","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking Evaluators and Inter-Religious Peacebuilders\",\"authors\":\"Michelle G. Garred, Rebecca Herrington, E. Hume\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110624625-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With funding from the GHR Foundation, the Alliance for Peacebuilding (AfP) and its partners CDA Collaborative Learning Projects (CDA) and Search for Common Ground (SFCG), in collaboration with a Global Advisory Council, led the Effective Inter-Religious Action in Peacebuilding Program (EIAP) project between 2015 and 2017.2 The project’s substantive learnings to date are captured in its primary publication: Faith Matters: A Guide for the Designing, Monitoring & Evaluation of Inter-Religious Action for Peace3 (hereafter referred to as the Faith Matters Guide). This chapter complements the Faith Matters Guide by exploring the underlying human learning processes that made the substantive learning possible. In bringing together representatives of two very different stakeholder audiences, evaluators and inter-religious actors, this project set in motion a mutually transformative exchange. Both groups are essential for progress, and yet previous communication and collaboration had been minimal. Therefore this chapter analyses what inter-religious peacebuilders and evaluators learned from each other during EIAP, unpacking the victories, tensions and challenges they encountered, to help illuminate the next phase of effort. The chapter also identifies real-world ways forward in developing evaluation approaches that both evaluators and inter-religious peacebuilders can embrace.4\",\"PeriodicalId\":316665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluating Interreligious Peacebuilding and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluating Interreligious Peacebuilding and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110624625-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluating Interreligious Peacebuilding and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110624625-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在GHR基金会的资助下,建设和平联盟(AfP)及其合作伙伴CDA合作学习项目(CDA)和寻求共同点(SFCG)与全球咨询委员会合作,在2015年至2017年期间领导了建设和平方案中有效的宗教间行动(EIAP)项目。该项目迄今为止的实质性学习成果见其主要出版物:信仰问题:《宗教间和平行动的设计、监测和评价指南》(以下简称《信仰事项指南》)。本章通过探索使实质性学习成为可能的潜在的人类学习过程来补充《信仰问题指南》。通过将两种截然不同的利益相关者受众、评估者和跨宗教行为者的代表聚集在一起,该项目启动了一场相互变革的交流。这两个群体对于进步都是必不可少的,但之前的沟通和合作很少。因此,本章分析了宗教间和平建设者和评估者在中东和平行动期间从彼此身上学到的东西,揭示了他们遇到的胜利、紧张和挑战,以帮助阐明下一阶段的努力。本章还指出了在发展评估人员和宗教间和平建设者都可以接受的评估方法方面的现实道路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linking Evaluators and Inter-Religious Peacebuilders
With funding from the GHR Foundation, the Alliance for Peacebuilding (AfP) and its partners CDA Collaborative Learning Projects (CDA) and Search for Common Ground (SFCG), in collaboration with a Global Advisory Council, led the Effective Inter-Religious Action in Peacebuilding Program (EIAP) project between 2015 and 2017.2 The project’s substantive learnings to date are captured in its primary publication: Faith Matters: A Guide for the Designing, Monitoring & Evaluation of Inter-Religious Action for Peace3 (hereafter referred to as the Faith Matters Guide). This chapter complements the Faith Matters Guide by exploring the underlying human learning processes that made the substantive learning possible. In bringing together representatives of two very different stakeholder audiences, evaluators and inter-religious actors, this project set in motion a mutually transformative exchange. Both groups are essential for progress, and yet previous communication and collaboration had been minimal. Therefore this chapter analyses what inter-religious peacebuilders and evaluators learned from each other during EIAP, unpacking the victories, tensions and challenges they encountered, to help illuminate the next phase of effort. The chapter also identifies real-world ways forward in developing evaluation approaches that both evaluators and inter-religious peacebuilders can embrace.4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Power Dynamics of Religious Leaders Linking Evaluators and Inter-Religious Peacebuilders Vying for Good Assessing the Impact of Interfaith Initiatives When My Peace Is Not Your Peace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1