审查COVID-19管理指南

Akashkumar N Singh, N. Singh, S. Tatineni
{"title":"审查COVID-19管理指南","authors":"Akashkumar N Singh, N. Singh, S. Tatineni","doi":"10.9734/ajrid/2023/v12i2240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected many countries across the globe both socially and economically and continues to be a major concern to the healthcare system. The majority of the patient groups that were affected were elderly patients and patients with existing co-morbidities such as such as diabetes; hypertension; cardiovascular disease; lung, liver, and kidney disease; cancer patients on chemotherapy; smokers; transplant recipients; and patients taking steroids etc. who were highly vulnerable and susceptible to the infection. Various protective measures such as quarantine from confirmed and suspected cases, nationwide lockdowns, etc., have been implemented in all the affected countries to contain the spread of the virus. Efforts have also been made to develop effective therapeutic strategies to stop the spread of the disease and minimize its high rates of morbidity and mortality especially considering the rapid evolution of the virus giving rise to different variants. A systematic review of the various guidelines published by well-known organizations such as Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the Ministry of Health (MoH) India and International organizations such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), National Institute of Health (NIH), and World Health Organization (WHO), for the management of COVID-19, was performed and a side-by-side comparison of various important aspects of these guidelines is presented in this review article. The review results showed that, despite minor differences in the terminology used for severity classification, SpO2 levels, quarantine period, and criteria of severity classification these guidelines were mostly similar pertaining to the clinical signs and symptoms of COVID-19, diagnosis and testing criteria, criteria for severity classification, preliminary advice, risk factors, isolation, and methods of prevention of spread – criteria for home quarantine, use of face mask, social distancing, etc. While the majority of the differences noted were mainly in the COVID-19 management strategies and/or treatment recommendations. Overall, besides the limitations, the various guidelines as discussed in this article can still serve as an important tool to healthcare workers and caregivers by providing adequate guidance on the right management of COVID-19 at that time.","PeriodicalId":166387,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of COVID-19 Management Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Akashkumar N Singh, N. Singh, S. Tatineni\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajrid/2023/v12i2240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected many countries across the globe both socially and economically and continues to be a major concern to the healthcare system. The majority of the patient groups that were affected were elderly patients and patients with existing co-morbidities such as such as diabetes; hypertension; cardiovascular disease; lung, liver, and kidney disease; cancer patients on chemotherapy; smokers; transplant recipients; and patients taking steroids etc. who were highly vulnerable and susceptible to the infection. Various protective measures such as quarantine from confirmed and suspected cases, nationwide lockdowns, etc., have been implemented in all the affected countries to contain the spread of the virus. Efforts have also been made to develop effective therapeutic strategies to stop the spread of the disease and minimize its high rates of morbidity and mortality especially considering the rapid evolution of the virus giving rise to different variants. A systematic review of the various guidelines published by well-known organizations such as Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the Ministry of Health (MoH) India and International organizations such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), National Institute of Health (NIH), and World Health Organization (WHO), for the management of COVID-19, was performed and a side-by-side comparison of various important aspects of these guidelines is presented in this review article. The review results showed that, despite minor differences in the terminology used for severity classification, SpO2 levels, quarantine period, and criteria of severity classification these guidelines were mostly similar pertaining to the clinical signs and symptoms of COVID-19, diagnosis and testing criteria, criteria for severity classification, preliminary advice, risk factors, isolation, and methods of prevention of spread – criteria for home quarantine, use of face mask, social distancing, etc. While the majority of the differences noted were mainly in the COVID-19 management strategies and/or treatment recommendations. Overall, besides the limitations, the various guidelines as discussed in this article can still serve as an important tool to healthcare workers and caregivers by providing adequate guidance on the right management of COVID-19 at that time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"259 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrid/2023/v12i2240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrid/2023/v12i2240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行在社会和经济上对全球许多国家产生了不利影响,并继续成为卫生保健系统的一个主要问题。大多数受影响的患者群体是老年患者和存在合并症(如糖尿病)的患者;高血压;心血管疾病;肺、肝、肾疾病;接受化疗的癌症患者;吸烟者;移植受者;还有服用类固醇的病人,他们非常容易受到感染。所有受影响的国家都采取了隔离确诊和疑似病例、全国范围内封锁等各种保护措施,以遏制病毒的传播。还努力制定有效的治疗战略,以阻止该疾病的传播,并尽量减少其高发病率和死亡率,特别是考虑到病毒的迅速演变产生不同的变种。对印度医学研究委员会(ICMR)和印度卫生部(MoH)等知名组织以及美国传染病学会(IDSA)、美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和世界卫生组织(WHO)等国际组织发布的关于COVID-19管理的各种指南进行了系统审查,并在本文中对这些指南的各个重要方面进行了并排比较。审查结果显示,尽管严重程度分类、SpO2水平、隔离期和严重程度分类标准使用的术语略有不同,但这些指南在COVID-19的临床体征和症状、诊断和检测标准、严重程度分类标准、初步建议、风险因素、隔离和预防传播方法(家庭隔离标准、使用口罩、保持社交距离、等。虽然注意到的大多数差异主要在于COVID-19管理策略和/或治疗建议。总的来说,除了局限性之外,本文中讨论的各种指南仍然可以作为医护人员和护理人员的重要工具,为当时正确管理COVID-19提供充分的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of COVID-19 Management Guidelines
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected many countries across the globe both socially and economically and continues to be a major concern to the healthcare system. The majority of the patient groups that were affected were elderly patients and patients with existing co-morbidities such as such as diabetes; hypertension; cardiovascular disease; lung, liver, and kidney disease; cancer patients on chemotherapy; smokers; transplant recipients; and patients taking steroids etc. who were highly vulnerable and susceptible to the infection. Various protective measures such as quarantine from confirmed and suspected cases, nationwide lockdowns, etc., have been implemented in all the affected countries to contain the spread of the virus. Efforts have also been made to develop effective therapeutic strategies to stop the spread of the disease and minimize its high rates of morbidity and mortality especially considering the rapid evolution of the virus giving rise to different variants. A systematic review of the various guidelines published by well-known organizations such as Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the Ministry of Health (MoH) India and International organizations such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), National Institute of Health (NIH), and World Health Organization (WHO), for the management of COVID-19, was performed and a side-by-side comparison of various important aspects of these guidelines is presented in this review article. The review results showed that, despite minor differences in the terminology used for severity classification, SpO2 levels, quarantine period, and criteria of severity classification these guidelines were mostly similar pertaining to the clinical signs and symptoms of COVID-19, diagnosis and testing criteria, criteria for severity classification, preliminary advice, risk factors, isolation, and methods of prevention of spread – criteria for home quarantine, use of face mask, social distancing, etc. While the majority of the differences noted were mainly in the COVID-19 management strategies and/or treatment recommendations. Overall, besides the limitations, the various guidelines as discussed in this article can still serve as an important tool to healthcare workers and caregivers by providing adequate guidance on the right management of COVID-19 at that time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report on Peritoneal Tuberculosis in an Immunocompromised Patient Self Medication Against COVID19 Infection: Assessment of Practices among Residents in a Semi Urban Nigerian Community Knowledge of Associated Risk Factors of Chronic Kidney Disease among Secondary School Teachers in Anambra State Nigeria Nursing Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Evidence Assessment of Cefuroxime and Cefuroxime Clavulanic Acid Prescription Practices for Infection Management in Routine Indian Healthcare Settings: Expert Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1