有争议的身份

Daniel R. Bare
{"title":"有争议的身份","authors":"Daniel R. Bare","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479803262.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debates within the black community over the value of fundamentalist religion often involved evaluations of how fundamentalism affected the race as a whole (for good or for ill) in the quest for justice and racial equality. This consideration, in turn, was often paired with assertions about the nature of American identity and how African Americans could best stake their claim as full, rightful participants in the American experiment. In this context, fundamentalism was treated not only as a matter of religion, but also one of race and politics. Black fundamentalists argued for their race’s true Americanism by drawing on the idea that the United States was a historically “Christian nation” and connecting their “old-time” fundamentalist faith with American ideals such as emancipation and democracy, while critics cast fundamentalism as a regressive blight on the black community, out of step with such American ideals as free thinking, free expression, and religious toleration. In newspapers, in epistolary exchanges, and in pulpits the debate over whether fundamentalism ought to be understood as a religion of racial progress or a religion of racial regress continued into the 1930s and beyond.","PeriodicalId":309537,"journal":{"name":"Black Fundamentalists","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contested Identities\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R. Bare\",\"doi\":\"10.18574/nyu/9781479803262.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debates within the black community over the value of fundamentalist religion often involved evaluations of how fundamentalism affected the race as a whole (for good or for ill) in the quest for justice and racial equality. This consideration, in turn, was often paired with assertions about the nature of American identity and how African Americans could best stake their claim as full, rightful participants in the American experiment. In this context, fundamentalism was treated not only as a matter of religion, but also one of race and politics. Black fundamentalists argued for their race’s true Americanism by drawing on the idea that the United States was a historically “Christian nation” and connecting their “old-time” fundamentalist faith with American ideals such as emancipation and democracy, while critics cast fundamentalism as a regressive blight on the black community, out of step with such American ideals as free thinking, free expression, and religious toleration. In newspapers, in epistolary exchanges, and in pulpits the debate over whether fundamentalism ought to be understood as a religion of racial progress or a religion of racial regress continued into the 1930s and beyond.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Black Fundamentalists\",\"volume\":\"259 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Black Fundamentalists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479803262.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Fundamentalists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479803262.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在黑人社区内,关于原教旨主义宗教价值的辩论经常涉及评估原教旨主义如何在追求正义和种族平等的过程中对整个种族产生影响(无论是好是坏)。反过来,这种考虑往往伴随着对美国身份本质的断言,以及非洲裔美国人如何才能最好地主张他们作为美国实验的充分、合法参与者的权利。在这种情况下,原教旨主义不仅被视为宗教问题,而且被视为种族和政治问题。黑人原教旨主义者认为,美国在历史上是一个“基督教国家”,并将他们的“旧时代”原教旨主义信仰与解放和民主等美国理想联系起来,以此来捍卫他们种族的真正美国主义,而批评者则认为原教旨主义是对黑人社区的一种倒退,与自由思想、自由表达和宗教宽容等美国理想脱节。在报纸上,在书信交流中,在讲坛上,关于原教旨主义应该被理解为种族进步的宗教还是种族倒退的宗教的争论一直持续到20世纪30年代及以后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contested Identities
Debates within the black community over the value of fundamentalist religion often involved evaluations of how fundamentalism affected the race as a whole (for good or for ill) in the quest for justice and racial equality. This consideration, in turn, was often paired with assertions about the nature of American identity and how African Americans could best stake their claim as full, rightful participants in the American experiment. In this context, fundamentalism was treated not only as a matter of religion, but also one of race and politics. Black fundamentalists argued for their race’s true Americanism by drawing on the idea that the United States was a historically “Christian nation” and connecting their “old-time” fundamentalist faith with American ideals such as emancipation and democracy, while critics cast fundamentalism as a regressive blight on the black community, out of step with such American ideals as free thinking, free expression, and religious toleration. In newspapers, in epistolary exchanges, and in pulpits the debate over whether fundamentalism ought to be understood as a religion of racial progress or a religion of racial regress continued into the 1930s and beyond.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Formulating the Faith Contested Identities “Filled to Overflowing” Religious Education and Interracial Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1