全渠道零售中消费者购买渠道偏好的决定因素

Mona Eckl, Michael Lingenfelder
{"title":"全渠道零售中消费者购买渠道偏好的决定因素","authors":"Mona Eckl, Michael Lingenfelder","doi":"10.15358/0344-1369-2021-4-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile technology and digitalisation put pressure on retailers to engage in omni-channel retailing. However, to avoid cannibalisation and create synergies, channels must differ and provide a unique service offer to the consumer. Indeed, little is known about what constitutes consumers’ channel preference in omni-channel environments. Thus, the present study evaluates consumers’ purchase channel preference considering benefits and costs. Besides, the role of channel experience and product category is estimated. Results demonstrate that consumers perceive differences between offline and digital channels in terms of utilitarian value, hedonic value and risk, but not in effort. While online and mobile channels are perceived as equally risky, the utilitarian value, hedonic value and effort they involve varies. But, despite the growing relevance of digitalisation, consumers still prefer purchasing offline for two different selected product categories. Thus, the authors offer implications for managerial practice to foster digital purchase channel preference.","PeriodicalId":446283,"journal":{"name":"Marketing ZFP","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Consumers' Purchase Channel Preference in Omni-Channel Retailing\",\"authors\":\"Mona Eckl, Michael Lingenfelder\",\"doi\":\"10.15358/0344-1369-2021-4-28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobile technology and digitalisation put pressure on retailers to engage in omni-channel retailing. However, to avoid cannibalisation and create synergies, channels must differ and provide a unique service offer to the consumer. Indeed, little is known about what constitutes consumers’ channel preference in omni-channel environments. Thus, the present study evaluates consumers’ purchase channel preference considering benefits and costs. Besides, the role of channel experience and product category is estimated. Results demonstrate that consumers perceive differences between offline and digital channels in terms of utilitarian value, hedonic value and risk, but not in effort. While online and mobile channels are perceived as equally risky, the utilitarian value, hedonic value and effort they involve varies. But, despite the growing relevance of digitalisation, consumers still prefer purchasing offline for two different selected product categories. Thus, the authors offer implications for managerial practice to foster digital purchase channel preference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marketing ZFP\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marketing ZFP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2021-4-28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing ZFP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2021-4-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

移动技术和数字化给零售商带来了从事全渠道零售的压力。然而,为了避免同类相食并产生协同效应,渠道必须有所不同,并为消费者提供独特的服务。事实上,在全渠道环境中,是什么构成了消费者的渠道偏好,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究考虑收益和成本来评估消费者的购买渠道偏好。并对渠道体验和产品品类的作用进行了估计。结果表明,消费者认为线下和数字渠道在功利价值、享乐价值和风险方面存在差异,但在努力方面没有差异。虽然人们认为在线和移动渠道的风险同样大,但它们所涉及的功利价值、享乐价值和努力各不相同。但是,尽管数字化的相关性越来越大,消费者仍然更喜欢在线下购买两种不同的精选产品类别。因此,作者为管理实践提供了培养数字购买渠道偏好的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of Consumers' Purchase Channel Preference in Omni-Channel Retailing
Mobile technology and digitalisation put pressure on retailers to engage in omni-channel retailing. However, to avoid cannibalisation and create synergies, channels must differ and provide a unique service offer to the consumer. Indeed, little is known about what constitutes consumers’ channel preference in omni-channel environments. Thus, the present study evaluates consumers’ purchase channel preference considering benefits and costs. Besides, the role of channel experience and product category is estimated. Results demonstrate that consumers perceive differences between offline and digital channels in terms of utilitarian value, hedonic value and risk, but not in effort. While online and mobile channels are perceived as equally risky, the utilitarian value, hedonic value and effort they involve varies. But, despite the growing relevance of digitalisation, consumers still prefer purchasing offline for two different selected product categories. Thus, the authors offer implications for managerial practice to foster digital purchase channel preference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Online Trust and Online Brand Equity Translate Online- and Omni-Channel-Specific Instruments into Repurchase Intentions Multi-Channel Management and Design: An Analysis of their Impact on Multi-Channel Conflict and Success Do Sustainability Labels Reinforce Health Claims - And Vice Versa? The Impact of Bodily Behaviors of Sales Representatives on Charisma Evaluations by Consumers: A Time-Series Perspective Drivers of Corporate Reputation and Its Differential Impact on Customer Loyalty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1