计算机网络中异常检测方法比较

Andreas Löf, R. Nelson
{"title":"计算机网络中异常检测方法比较","authors":"Andreas Löf, R. Nelson","doi":"10.1109/ICIMP.2010.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work in progress outlines a comparison of anomaly detection methods that we are undertaking. We are comparing different types of anomaly detection methods with the purpose of achieving results covering a broad spectrum of anomalies. We also outline the datasets that we will be using and the metrics that we will use for our evaluation.","PeriodicalId":314947,"journal":{"name":"2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Anomaly Detection Methods in Computer Networks\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Löf, R. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIMP.2010.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work in progress outlines a comparison of anomaly detection methods that we are undertaking. We are comparing different types of anomaly detection methods with the purpose of achieving results covering a broad spectrum of anomalies. We also outline the datasets that we will be using and the metrics that we will use for our evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection\",\"volume\":\"261 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMP.2010.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMP.2010.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这项正在进行的工作概述了我们正在进行的异常检测方法的比较。我们正在比较不同类型的异常检测方法,目的是获得涵盖广泛异常范围的结果。我们还概述了我们将使用的数据集和我们将用于评估的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Anomaly Detection Methods in Computer Networks
This work in progress outlines a comparison of anomaly detection methods that we are undertaking. We are comparing different types of anomaly detection methods with the purpose of achieving results covering a broad spectrum of anomalies. We also outline the datasets that we will be using and the metrics that we will use for our evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A-MAKE: An Efficient, Anonymous and Accountable Authentication Framework for WMNs FEMRA: Fuzzy Expert Model for Risk Assessment GoldPhish: Using Images for Content-Based Phishing Analysis Comparing Anomaly Detection Methods in Computer Networks Authentication of Biometric Features Using Texture Coding for ID Cards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1