法国农业沼气厂的异质性:创新视角的部门系统

A. Berthe, Pascal Grouiez, Mathilde Fautras
{"title":"法国农业沼气厂的异质性:创新视角的部门系统","authors":"A. Berthe, Pascal Grouiez, Mathilde Fautras","doi":"10.3917/jie.pr1.0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literature on biogas production mainly studies the outputs of production or the technical dimension of its organization. We argue that there is a need to study this process in a more institutional political economy perspective to understand the variety of biogas plants’ organizational models. We draw on the sectoral system of innovation and production perspective (SSIP) to analyze strategies of farmers adopting such an innovation in the agricultural sector. We mobilize data from semi-structured interviews with farmers and 1. Acknowledgements: The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their relevant comments and suggestions that helped to improve this article. The authors are also very grateful to the interviewees. This paper is part of the “Métha’Revenus” (CEP 2018 AAP 01) research project. The authors wish to thank Louis Dupuy, Martino Nieddu, all the members of the BIOCA research program, Léa Molinié, and Mickaël Hugonnet, for their valuable advice on this research. The authors also wish to thank the PSDR4 programme which has allowed scientific cooperation with other programs addressing biogas production in France. Financial support: This project benefited from the support of the French Ministry of Agriculture (CEP 2018 AAP 01 project). It also benefited from the support of the Centre des Politiques de la Terre (Idex Université de Paris, Meth’InTer) as well as the APESA. This work has also received financial support from the LabEx DynamiTe (ANR-11-LABX-0046) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program. n° 38 – Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 2022/2 11 DOI: 10.3917/jie.038.0011 © D e B oe ck S up ér ie ur | T él éc ha rg é le 0 1/ 06 /2 02 2 su r w w w .c ai rn .in fo ( IP : 3 5. 16 0. 27 .2 21 ) © D e B oeck S uprieur | T éléhargé le 016/2022 ur w w w .can.info IP : 35.1.27.221) institutional stakeholders in France. We highlight a process of heterogenization of agricultural biogas plants, which results from a conflictual but lasting process of new technology appropriation by actors with various strategies within and outside the agricultural sector. We identify four different agricultural biogas production models: internalization and symbiosis, cereal grower using BP in injection, small group of farmers, partial outsourcing, and generic technology. We also discuss the possibility of the emergence of a new one: agricultural cooperative-investors joint projects.","PeriodicalId":151329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation Economics & Management","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity of Agricultural Biogas Plants in France:  A Sectoral System of Innovation Perspective\",\"authors\":\"A. Berthe, Pascal Grouiez, Mathilde Fautras\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/jie.pr1.0116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Literature on biogas production mainly studies the outputs of production or the technical dimension of its organization. We argue that there is a need to study this process in a more institutional political economy perspective to understand the variety of biogas plants’ organizational models. We draw on the sectoral system of innovation and production perspective (SSIP) to analyze strategies of farmers adopting such an innovation in the agricultural sector. We mobilize data from semi-structured interviews with farmers and 1. Acknowledgements: The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their relevant comments and suggestions that helped to improve this article. The authors are also very grateful to the interviewees. This paper is part of the “Métha’Revenus” (CEP 2018 AAP 01) research project. The authors wish to thank Louis Dupuy, Martino Nieddu, all the members of the BIOCA research program, Léa Molinié, and Mickaël Hugonnet, for their valuable advice on this research. The authors also wish to thank the PSDR4 programme which has allowed scientific cooperation with other programs addressing biogas production in France. Financial support: This project benefited from the support of the French Ministry of Agriculture (CEP 2018 AAP 01 project). It also benefited from the support of the Centre des Politiques de la Terre (Idex Université de Paris, Meth’InTer) as well as the APESA. This work has also received financial support from the LabEx DynamiTe (ANR-11-LABX-0046) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program. n° 38 – Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 2022/2 11 DOI: 10.3917/jie.038.0011 © D e B oe ck S up ér ie ur | T él éc ha rg é le 0 1/ 06 /2 02 2 su r w w w .c ai rn .in fo ( IP : 3 5. 16 0. 27 .2 21 ) © D e B oeck S uprieur | T éléhargé le 016/2022 ur w w w .can.info IP : 35.1.27.221) institutional stakeholders in France. We highlight a process of heterogenization of agricultural biogas plants, which results from a conflictual but lasting process of new technology appropriation by actors with various strategies within and outside the agricultural sector. We identify four different agricultural biogas production models: internalization and symbiosis, cereal grower using BP in injection, small group of farmers, partial outsourcing, and generic technology. We also discuss the possibility of the emergence of a new one: agricultural cooperative-investors joint projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation Economics & Management\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation Economics & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation Economics & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

关于沼气生产的文献主要研究生产的产出或其组织的技术维度。我们认为,有必要从制度政治经济学的角度来研究这一过程,以了解沼气厂组织模式的多样性。我们利用创新和生产视角的部门系统(SSIP)来分析农民在农业部门采用这种创新的策略。我们从对农民的半结构化访谈中收集数据。致谢:作者感谢两位匿名审稿人的相关意见和建议,帮助改进了本文。作者也非常感谢受访者。本文是“m2013.2013.01”(CEP 2018 AAP 01)研究项目的一部分。作者要感谢Louis Dupuy、Martino Nieddu、BIOCA研究项目的所有成员、l molini和Mickaël Hugonnet对这项研究提出的宝贵意见。作者还希望感谢PSDR4计划,该计划允许与法国解决沼气生产问题的其他计划进行科学合作。资金支持:本项目得益于法国农业部(CEP 2018 AAP 01项目)的支持。它还得到了土地政治中心(巴黎国际大学)和欧洲环境研究所的支持。这项工作也得到了LabEx DynamiTe (ANR-11-LABX-0046)的资金支持,作为“avenir投资”计划的一部分。[j] .创新经济与管理学报,2022/2 11 DOI: 10.3917/jie.038.0011©D e B e e e up S - up ·················16 0。[27.2] 21)©D e B oeck S uprieur | T /2022 ur w w w .can.info IP: 35.1.27.221)法国的机构利益相关者。我们强调了农业沼气厂异质化的过程,这是一个冲突但持久的过程,由农业部门内外具有各种战略的行动者挪用新技术。我们确定了四种不同的农业沼气生产模式:内部化和共生、谷物种植者使用BP注射剂、小农群体、部分外包和通用技术。我们还讨论了出现一种新形式的可能性:农业合作社-投资者联合项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heterogeneity of Agricultural Biogas Plants in France:  A Sectoral System of Innovation Perspective
Literature on biogas production mainly studies the outputs of production or the technical dimension of its organization. We argue that there is a need to study this process in a more institutional political economy perspective to understand the variety of biogas plants’ organizational models. We draw on the sectoral system of innovation and production perspective (SSIP) to analyze strategies of farmers adopting such an innovation in the agricultural sector. We mobilize data from semi-structured interviews with farmers and 1. Acknowledgements: The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their relevant comments and suggestions that helped to improve this article. The authors are also very grateful to the interviewees. This paper is part of the “Métha’Revenus” (CEP 2018 AAP 01) research project. The authors wish to thank Louis Dupuy, Martino Nieddu, all the members of the BIOCA research program, Léa Molinié, and Mickaël Hugonnet, for their valuable advice on this research. The authors also wish to thank the PSDR4 programme which has allowed scientific cooperation with other programs addressing biogas production in France. Financial support: This project benefited from the support of the French Ministry of Agriculture (CEP 2018 AAP 01 project). It also benefited from the support of the Centre des Politiques de la Terre (Idex Université de Paris, Meth’InTer) as well as the APESA. This work has also received financial support from the LabEx DynamiTe (ANR-11-LABX-0046) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program. n° 38 – Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 2022/2 11 DOI: 10.3917/jie.038.0011 © D e B oe ck S up ér ie ur | T él éc ha rg é le 0 1/ 06 /2 02 2 su r w w w .c ai rn .in fo ( IP : 3 5. 16 0. 27 .2 21 ) © D e B oeck S uprieur | T éléhargé le 016/2022 ur w w w .can.info IP : 35.1.27.221) institutional stakeholders in France. We highlight a process of heterogenization of agricultural biogas plants, which results from a conflictual but lasting process of new technology appropriation by actors with various strategies within and outside the agricultural sector. We identify four different agricultural biogas production models: internalization and symbiosis, cereal grower using BP in injection, small group of farmers, partial outsourcing, and generic technology. We also discuss the possibility of the emergence of a new one: agricultural cooperative-investors joint projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems The Impacts of Blockchain on Innovation Management: Sectoral Experiments Artificial Intelligence, Robots and Unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries H. Kent Baker, Ehsan Nikbakht, Sean Stein Smith (2021), The Emerald Handbook of Blockchain for Business, Bingley, UK, Emerald Publishing Limited, 464 p. Factors Influencing Profitability in Eco-design: Lessons from European and Canadian Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1