豇豆(Vigna Sinensis (L.))的生长分析及响应(Savi Ex Hassk.)和赤根藜(Amaranthus retroflexus L.),生长在纯和混合林分,对密度和水分胁迫

J. Qasem, K. N. Biftu
{"title":"豇豆(Vigna Sinensis (L.))的生长分析及响应(Savi Ex Hassk.)和赤根藜(Amaranthus retroflexus L.),生长在纯和混合林分,对密度和水分胁迫","authors":"J. Qasem, K. N. Biftu","doi":"10.2174/1874840601003010021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of water stress and planting density on the competitive relationships, yield performance, and dynamics in canopy dominance of cowpea (Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi ex Hassk) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) grown in pure and mixed stands were investigated under glasshouse and field conditions. Results showed that water stress at early growth stages reduced plant height, shoot dry weight, leaf area, leaf dry weight and lowered pod dry weight of cowpea, and inflorescence dry weight of A. retroflexus. The effect on both species was more pronounced at high planting densities as a result of severe intraspecific competition. In pure stands, cowpea was affected more than A. retroflexus and the effect was more pronounced on reproductive organs development. Growth analysis of both species grown in pure stands for different periods indicated that leaf area was the most descriptive variable in shoot dry weight and total dry weight of both species at early growth stage. A. retroflexus grew at a faster rate with higher net assimilation rate per unit leaf area and allocated more resources to leaves and roots than did cowpea. Results showed that A. retroflexus was stronger competitor than cowpea. Competition reduced growth and competitive abilities of both species mainly by reducing leaf area early in growth but the effect was more pronounced on cowpea. Keyword: A. retroflexus, Vigna sinensis, development, inter-specific competition, intra-specific competition, stress responses.","PeriodicalId":166627,"journal":{"name":"The Open Horticulture Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth Analysis and Responses of Cowpea (Vigna Sinensis (L.) Savi Ex Hassk.) and Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), Grown in Pure and Mixed Stands, to Density and Water Stresses\",\"authors\":\"J. Qasem, K. N. Biftu\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874840601003010021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effects of water stress and planting density on the competitive relationships, yield performance, and dynamics in canopy dominance of cowpea (Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi ex Hassk) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) grown in pure and mixed stands were investigated under glasshouse and field conditions. Results showed that water stress at early growth stages reduced plant height, shoot dry weight, leaf area, leaf dry weight and lowered pod dry weight of cowpea, and inflorescence dry weight of A. retroflexus. The effect on both species was more pronounced at high planting densities as a result of severe intraspecific competition. In pure stands, cowpea was affected more than A. retroflexus and the effect was more pronounced on reproductive organs development. Growth analysis of both species grown in pure stands for different periods indicated that leaf area was the most descriptive variable in shoot dry weight and total dry weight of both species at early growth stage. A. retroflexus grew at a faster rate with higher net assimilation rate per unit leaf area and allocated more resources to leaves and roots than did cowpea. Results showed that A. retroflexus was stronger competitor than cowpea. Competition reduced growth and competitive abilities of both species mainly by reducing leaf area early in growth but the effect was more pronounced on cowpea. Keyword: A. retroflexus, Vigna sinensis, development, inter-specific competition, intra-specific competition, stress responses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Horticulture Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Horticulture Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874840601003010021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Horticulture Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874840601003010021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

水分胁迫和种植密度对豇豆(Vigna sinensis, L.)冠层优势竞争关系、产量表现和动态的影响在温室和田间条件下,对纯林分和混交林中生长的苋属植物(Savi ex Hassk)和红根藜属植物(Amaranthus retroflexus L.)进行了研究。结果表明:生长早期水分胁迫降低了豇豆株高、茎干重、叶面积、叶干重和荚果干重,降低了豇豆花序干重;在高种植密度下,由于种内竞争激烈,对两种植物的影响更为明显。在纯林分,豇豆受到的影响大于逆行豇豆,且对生殖器官发育的影响更为明显。两种树种在纯林分不同时期的生长分析表明,叶面积是两种树种生长前期地上部干重和总干重最具描述性的变量。与豇豆相比,黄花豆生长速度更快,单位叶面积净同化率更高,分配给叶和根的资源更多。结果表明,逆行黄豆比豇豆具有更强的竞争能力。竞争降低了两种植物的生长和竞争能力,主要表现为生长早期叶面积的减少,但对豇豆的影响更为明显。关键词:逆行田鼠,中华田鼠,发育,种间竞争,种内竞争,应激反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Growth Analysis and Responses of Cowpea (Vigna Sinensis (L.) Savi Ex Hassk.) and Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), Grown in Pure and Mixed Stands, to Density and Water Stresses
The effects of water stress and planting density on the competitive relationships, yield performance, and dynamics in canopy dominance of cowpea (Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi ex Hassk) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) grown in pure and mixed stands were investigated under glasshouse and field conditions. Results showed that water stress at early growth stages reduced plant height, shoot dry weight, leaf area, leaf dry weight and lowered pod dry weight of cowpea, and inflorescence dry weight of A. retroflexus. The effect on both species was more pronounced at high planting densities as a result of severe intraspecific competition. In pure stands, cowpea was affected more than A. retroflexus and the effect was more pronounced on reproductive organs development. Growth analysis of both species grown in pure stands for different periods indicated that leaf area was the most descriptive variable in shoot dry weight and total dry weight of both species at early growth stage. A. retroflexus grew at a faster rate with higher net assimilation rate per unit leaf area and allocated more resources to leaves and roots than did cowpea. Results showed that A. retroflexus was stronger competitor than cowpea. Competition reduced growth and competitive abilities of both species mainly by reducing leaf area early in growth but the effect was more pronounced on cowpea. Keyword: A. retroflexus, Vigna sinensis, development, inter-specific competition, intra-specific competition, stress responses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foliar Silicon and Titanium Applications Influence Growth and Quality Characteristics of Annual Bedding Plants Increased Antioxidant Activity, Despite Reduced Rosmarinic Acid Accumulation in Methanolic Extracts, of Spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) Plantlets Regenerated In Vitro Somatic Embryogenesis of Some Member Ornamental Genera of Amaryllidaceae and Allied Families: the Similarities and Differences Cultivar and Growing Location Effects on Fatty Acids, Minerals, and Sugars in Green Seeds of White Lupin (Lupinus albus L.) Differential Photosynthetic Efficiency and Pigment Content in Two Common Purslane (Portulaca oleracea) Biotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1