使用基于时间的流量管理调度程序减少邻近中心机场的起飞延误:复选框开还是关?

B. Parke, C. Mohlenbrink, Connie L. Brasil, Constantine Speridakos, Hyo-sang Yoo, Faisal Omar, Nathan Buckley, Conrad Gabriel, A. Belfield, Paul U. Lee, N. Smith
{"title":"使用基于时间的流量管理调度程序减少邻近中心机场的起飞延误:复选框开还是关?","authors":"B. Parke, C. Mohlenbrink, Connie L. Brasil, Constantine Speridakos, Hyo-sang Yoo, Faisal Omar, Nathan Buckley, Conrad Gabriel, A. Belfield, Paul U. Lee, N. Smith","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2016.7778096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a checkbox in the Time-Based Flow Management (TBFM) scheduling window which, when checked by a Traffic Management Coordinator (TMC), makes room for a departure to fit into a crowded airborne stream. The checkbox ON algorithm accomplishes this by delaying the Scheduled Times of Arrivals (STAs) of the airborne flights upstream of the TBFM freeze horizons and compressing these flights to their minimum required spacing, thereby creating a full departure slot. Hence, having the checkbox ON can reduce the frequent ground delays of aircraft departing near high volume airports but can increase delays for airborne arrivals. A Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) simulation compared arrival and departure delays to Newark Airport (EWR) with the checkbox ON vs. OFF as the default position. Three other conditions in this HITL involved various National Airspace System (NAS)-wide approaches for timely delivery of aircraft to the TBFM region. These conditions were: Baseline, using current Mile-in-Trail (MIT) spacing restrictions; Integrated Demand Management (IDM), where all aircraft were given departure times (Expect Departure Clearance Times, or EDCTs), ultimately based on the EWR Airport Arrival Rate; and IDM plus Required Time of Arrival (RTA), a flight deck tool which allowed some aircraft to meet a controlled time of arrival to the TBFM area more precisely. Results showed that the checkbox tool was powerful: with the checkbox ON, departure delays decreased and airborne delays increased, as predicted. However, assuming that the cost ratio of a minute of airborne delay to a minute of departure delay is in the range of 1.2 to 3, as commonly indicated by the literature, checkbox ON and checkbox OFF conditions showed approximately equal total delay costs, i.e., the cost of delays in the air balanced the cost of the delay on the ground. The three scheduling conditions also had approximately equal total delay costs, although a simulation artifact may have reduced the delays in the Baseline condition. In the debrief following the simulation, the TMCs concluded that the checkbox should be used flexibly depending on the current delay situation, and suggested modifications to the checkbox tool which would help them use it in this way, along with enhanced training. The relatively similar total cost of both checkbox default options in this simulation indicates that this might be a fruitful approach, and replace the necessity to have the checkbox rigidly set to either ON or OFF.","PeriodicalId":340472,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing departure delays for adjacent center airports using time-based flow management scheduler: Checkbox ON or OFF?\",\"authors\":\"B. Parke, C. Mohlenbrink, Connie L. Brasil, Constantine Speridakos, Hyo-sang Yoo, Faisal Omar, Nathan Buckley, Conrad Gabriel, A. Belfield, Paul U. Lee, N. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC.2016.7778096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a checkbox in the Time-Based Flow Management (TBFM) scheduling window which, when checked by a Traffic Management Coordinator (TMC), makes room for a departure to fit into a crowded airborne stream. The checkbox ON algorithm accomplishes this by delaying the Scheduled Times of Arrivals (STAs) of the airborne flights upstream of the TBFM freeze horizons and compressing these flights to their minimum required spacing, thereby creating a full departure slot. Hence, having the checkbox ON can reduce the frequent ground delays of aircraft departing near high volume airports but can increase delays for airborne arrivals. A Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) simulation compared arrival and departure delays to Newark Airport (EWR) with the checkbox ON vs. OFF as the default position. Three other conditions in this HITL involved various National Airspace System (NAS)-wide approaches for timely delivery of aircraft to the TBFM region. These conditions were: Baseline, using current Mile-in-Trail (MIT) spacing restrictions; Integrated Demand Management (IDM), where all aircraft were given departure times (Expect Departure Clearance Times, or EDCTs), ultimately based on the EWR Airport Arrival Rate; and IDM plus Required Time of Arrival (RTA), a flight deck tool which allowed some aircraft to meet a controlled time of arrival to the TBFM area more precisely. Results showed that the checkbox tool was powerful: with the checkbox ON, departure delays decreased and airborne delays increased, as predicted. However, assuming that the cost ratio of a minute of airborne delay to a minute of departure delay is in the range of 1.2 to 3, as commonly indicated by the literature, checkbox ON and checkbox OFF conditions showed approximately equal total delay costs, i.e., the cost of delays in the air balanced the cost of the delay on the ground. The three scheduling conditions also had approximately equal total delay costs, although a simulation artifact may have reduced the delays in the Baseline condition. In the debrief following the simulation, the TMCs concluded that the checkbox should be used flexibly depending on the current delay situation, and suggested modifications to the checkbox tool which would help them use it in this way, along with enhanced training. The relatively similar total cost of both checkbox default options in this simulation indicates that this might be a fruitful approach, and replace the necessity to have the checkbox rigidly set to either ON or OFF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2016.7778096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2016.7778096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在基于时间的流量管理(TBFM)调度窗口中有一个复选框,当交通管理协调器(TMC)选中该复选框时,它会为航班腾出空间,以适应拥挤的空中流。复选框ON算法通过延迟TBFM冻结视界上游的空中航班的预定到达时间(STAs)并将这些航班压缩到所需的最小间隔,从而创建一个完整的出发时隙来实现这一点。因此,启用复选框可以减少在客流量大的机场附近起飞的飞机频繁的地面延误,但可能增加空中到达的延误。人在环(HITL)模拟比较了纽瓦克机场(EWR)的到达和离开延误,并将复选框开与关作为默认位置。该HITL的其他三个条件涉及为及时向TBFM区域交付飞机而采用的各种全国家空域系统进场办法。这些条件分别是:基线条件,使用当前的行驶里程(MIT)间距限制;综合需求管理(IDM),根据EWR机场到达率,为所有飞机提供出发时间(预计离境通关时间,或edct);IDM加上所需到达时间(RTA),这是一种飞行甲板工具,允许一些飞机更精确地满足到达TBFM区域的控制时间。结果表明,复选框工具是强大的:当复选框打开时,起飞延误减少,空中延误增加,正如预测的那样。然而,假设一分钟的空中延误与一分钟的起飞延误的成本之比在1.2 ~ 3之间,如文献中通常所示,复选框开和复选框关的情况显示的总延误成本大致相等,即空中延误的成本与地面延误的成本相平衡。这三种调度条件也具有大致相等的总延迟成本,尽管模拟工件可能已经减少了基线条件中的延迟。在模拟后的汇报中,tmc认为应根据当前的延误情况灵活使用复选框,并建议对复选框工具进行修改,以帮助他们以这种方式使用复选框,同时加强培训。在此模拟中,两个复选框默认选项的总成本相对相似,这表明这可能是一种富有成效的方法,并取代了将复选框严格设置为ON或OFF的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reducing departure delays for adjacent center airports using time-based flow management scheduler: Checkbox ON or OFF?
There is a checkbox in the Time-Based Flow Management (TBFM) scheduling window which, when checked by a Traffic Management Coordinator (TMC), makes room for a departure to fit into a crowded airborne stream. The checkbox ON algorithm accomplishes this by delaying the Scheduled Times of Arrivals (STAs) of the airborne flights upstream of the TBFM freeze horizons and compressing these flights to their minimum required spacing, thereby creating a full departure slot. Hence, having the checkbox ON can reduce the frequent ground delays of aircraft departing near high volume airports but can increase delays for airborne arrivals. A Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) simulation compared arrival and departure delays to Newark Airport (EWR) with the checkbox ON vs. OFF as the default position. Three other conditions in this HITL involved various National Airspace System (NAS)-wide approaches for timely delivery of aircraft to the TBFM region. These conditions were: Baseline, using current Mile-in-Trail (MIT) spacing restrictions; Integrated Demand Management (IDM), where all aircraft were given departure times (Expect Departure Clearance Times, or EDCTs), ultimately based on the EWR Airport Arrival Rate; and IDM plus Required Time of Arrival (RTA), a flight deck tool which allowed some aircraft to meet a controlled time of arrival to the TBFM area more precisely. Results showed that the checkbox tool was powerful: with the checkbox ON, departure delays decreased and airborne delays increased, as predicted. However, assuming that the cost ratio of a minute of airborne delay to a minute of departure delay is in the range of 1.2 to 3, as commonly indicated by the literature, checkbox ON and checkbox OFF conditions showed approximately equal total delay costs, i.e., the cost of delays in the air balanced the cost of the delay on the ground. The three scheduling conditions also had approximately equal total delay costs, although a simulation artifact may have reduced the delays in the Baseline condition. In the debrief following the simulation, the TMCs concluded that the checkbox should be used flexibly depending on the current delay situation, and suggested modifications to the checkbox tool which would help them use it in this way, along with enhanced training. The relatively similar total cost of both checkbox default options in this simulation indicates that this might be a fruitful approach, and replace the necessity to have the checkbox rigidly set to either ON or OFF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trajectory optimisation for avionics-based GNSS integrity augmentation system Modeling standard for distributed control systems: IEC 61499 from industrial automation to aerospace Ontological knowledge representation for avionics decision-making support Conflict resolution for wind-optimal aircraft trajectories in North Atlantic oceanic airspace with wind uncertainties Flexible open architecture for UASs integration into the airspace: Paparazzi autopilot system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1