职前教师对抄袭认知的研究

Doo-yeon Lee, J. Kim
{"title":"职前教师对抄袭认知的研究","authors":"Doo-yeon Lee, J. Kim","doi":"10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the current study was to investigate pre-service teachers' perception of plagiarism and plagiarism prevention education with the inclusions of variables such as major and gender. Participants of the study were 118 pre-service teachers majoring in English education and Ethics education at a university located in Korea's Gyeongsang Province. A questionnaire, developed and used for data collection, was composed of five parts: demographic data and a definition of plagiarism, the current status of assignments, reasons for plagiarism, degree of plagiarism, and lectures related to plagiarism or citation methods. A paired t-test, an independent t-test, frequency, and ANOVA were used to analyze the possible differences based on variables of gender and major.The study revealed that almost all students were aware that plagiarism is problematic. However, despite their increased awareness of plagiarism, they also reported that they had rarely taken or heard about lectures on how to cite or research ethics. In addition, the reasons why pre-service teachers engage in plagiarism are affected by variables such as the amount and difficulty of the assignments and the type of assignments they were given. It was also found that female students and students majoring in Ethics education were more strictly aware of plagiarism even though most of the items did not show statistically significant differences according to gender or major. The findings from the present study suggest that plagiarism prevention education targeting pre-service teachers should include proper citation methods and prevention education appropriate for each task type, including self-plagiarism.","PeriodicalId":267224,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of General Education","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Pre-service Teachers' Perception of Plagiarism\",\"authors\":\"Doo-yeon Lee, J. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the current study was to investigate pre-service teachers' perception of plagiarism and plagiarism prevention education with the inclusions of variables such as major and gender. Participants of the study were 118 pre-service teachers majoring in English education and Ethics education at a university located in Korea's Gyeongsang Province. A questionnaire, developed and used for data collection, was composed of five parts: demographic data and a definition of plagiarism, the current status of assignments, reasons for plagiarism, degree of plagiarism, and lectures related to plagiarism or citation methods. A paired t-test, an independent t-test, frequency, and ANOVA were used to analyze the possible differences based on variables of gender and major.The study revealed that almost all students were aware that plagiarism is problematic. However, despite their increased awareness of plagiarism, they also reported that they had rarely taken or heard about lectures on how to cite or research ethics. In addition, the reasons why pre-service teachers engage in plagiarism are affected by variables such as the amount and difficulty of the assignments and the type of assignments they were given. It was also found that female students and students majoring in Ethics education were more strictly aware of plagiarism even though most of the items did not show statistically significant differences according to gender or major. The findings from the present study suggest that plagiarism prevention education targeting pre-service teachers should include proper citation methods and prevention education appropriate for each task type, including self-plagiarism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Association of General Education\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Association of General Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of General Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨职前教师对抄袭的认知和抄袭预防教育,包括专业和性别等变量。研究对象是庆尚道某大学英语教育和伦理教育专业的118名职前教师。一份用于数据收集的调查问卷由五部分组成:人口统计数据和抄袭的定义,作业的现状,抄袭的原因,抄袭的程度,以及与抄袭或引用方法相关的讲座。采用配对t检验、独立t检验、频率和方差分析分析基于性别和专业变量的可能差异。调查显示,几乎所有的学生都意识到抄袭是一个问题。然而,尽管他们对抄袭的意识越来越强,但他们也报告说,他们很少参加或听过关于如何引用或研究伦理的讲座。此外,职前教师从事抄袭的原因受到作业数量和难度以及作业类型等变量的影响。女学生和伦理教育专业的学生对抄袭的意识更严格,但大多数项目在性别和专业上没有统计学上的差异。本研究结果表明,针对职前教师的预防抄袭教育应包括适当的引用方法和针对每种任务类型的预防抄袭教育,包括自我抄袭教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study of Pre-service Teachers' Perception of Plagiarism
The purpose of the current study was to investigate pre-service teachers' perception of plagiarism and plagiarism prevention education with the inclusions of variables such as major and gender. Participants of the study were 118 pre-service teachers majoring in English education and Ethics education at a university located in Korea's Gyeongsang Province. A questionnaire, developed and used for data collection, was composed of five parts: demographic data and a definition of plagiarism, the current status of assignments, reasons for plagiarism, degree of plagiarism, and lectures related to plagiarism or citation methods. A paired t-test, an independent t-test, frequency, and ANOVA were used to analyze the possible differences based on variables of gender and major.The study revealed that almost all students were aware that plagiarism is problematic. However, despite their increased awareness of plagiarism, they also reported that they had rarely taken or heard about lectures on how to cite or research ethics. In addition, the reasons why pre-service teachers engage in plagiarism are affected by variables such as the amount and difficulty of the assignments and the type of assignments they were given. It was also found that female students and students majoring in Ethics education were more strictly aware of plagiarism even though most of the items did not show statistically significant differences according to gender or major. The findings from the present study suggest that plagiarism prevention education targeting pre-service teachers should include proper citation methods and prevention education appropriate for each task type, including self-plagiarism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on Reading Programs in the Convergence Era : Focusing on Book-trailer Activities Liberal Arts Education in the Anthropocene and the PBL Living Lab : Focusing on Korea University's Core Liberal Arts Course LIBERTY JUSTICE TRUTH Ⅱ Posthumanitas : Civilization's Transition and a New Understanding of Humanity Exploring Topics in Domestic Research on Machine Translation through Text Mining A Study on the Competence-based General Education and the Development of Convergent Thinking : Focusing on the Analysis of the Learner Centered Teaching-learning Practices Using Poster Presentations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1