顺序回归将患者分类为Phadiatop测试组

P. Kuránová, Zdeňka Hajduková
{"title":"顺序回归将患者分类为Phadiatop测试组","authors":"P. Kuránová, Zdeňka Hajduková","doi":"10.1109/DT.2014.6868711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was based on the examination of Phadiatop onerous test at the Clinic of Occupational and Preventive Medicine in order to save money and not to make unnecessary testing. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of the test Phadiatop using personal or family medical records history only. This estimation used statistical methods, specifically ordinal regression. The most important findings are that Phadiatop test result does not imply eczema; it is a different immune response and the disease is not relevant in personal or family anamnesis. The success rate of classifying each patient into one of the five Phadiatop test groups according to the seriousness of diseases was about 68%. Also a testing based on age groups of the patients was done using this database. The presence of the positive Phadiatop test was the most common for people born between 1972 and 1981, where the genetic predispositions for a positive Phadiatop test results are about 39%.","PeriodicalId":330975,"journal":{"name":"The 10th International Conference on Digital Technologies 2014","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ordinal regression for classification of patients into one of the individual Phadiatop test groups\",\"authors\":\"P. Kuránová, Zdeňka Hajduková\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DT.2014.6868711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was based on the examination of Phadiatop onerous test at the Clinic of Occupational and Preventive Medicine in order to save money and not to make unnecessary testing. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of the test Phadiatop using personal or family medical records history only. This estimation used statistical methods, specifically ordinal regression. The most important findings are that Phadiatop test result does not imply eczema; it is a different immune response and the disease is not relevant in personal or family anamnesis. The success rate of classifying each patient into one of the five Phadiatop test groups according to the seriousness of diseases was about 68%. Also a testing based on age groups of the patients was done using this database. The presence of the positive Phadiatop test was the most common for people born between 1972 and 1981, where the genetic predispositions for a positive Phadiatop test results are about 39%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 10th International Conference on Digital Technologies 2014\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 10th International Conference on Digital Technologies 2014\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DT.2014.6868711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 10th International Conference on Digital Technologies 2014","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DT.2014.6868711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了节省费用,避免不必要的检查,本研究以职业预防医学诊所的Phadiatop繁琐检查为基础。本研究的目的是仅使用个人或家庭病史来评估Phadiatop测试的结果。这种估计使用了统计方法,特别是有序回归。最重要的发现是Phadiatop试验结果并不意味着湿疹;这是一种不同的免疫反应,这种疾病与个人或家庭记忆无关。根据疾病的严重程度将每个患者划分为五个Phadiatop测试组的成功率约为68%。同时,基于患者年龄组的测试也使用了这个数据库。在1972年至1981年之间出生的人中,Phadiatop检测阳性最为常见,其Phadiatop检测阳性的遗传倾向约为39%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ordinal regression for classification of patients into one of the individual Phadiatop test groups
This study was based on the examination of Phadiatop onerous test at the Clinic of Occupational and Preventive Medicine in order to save money and not to make unnecessary testing. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of the test Phadiatop using personal or family medical records history only. This estimation used statistical methods, specifically ordinal regression. The most important findings are that Phadiatop test result does not imply eczema; it is a different immune response and the disease is not relevant in personal or family anamnesis. The success rate of classifying each patient into one of the five Phadiatop test groups according to the seriousness of diseases was about 68%. Also a testing based on age groups of the patients was done using this database. The presence of the positive Phadiatop test was the most common for people born between 1972 and 1981, where the genetic predispositions for a positive Phadiatop test results are about 39%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of spectral analysis methods for precision indoor positioning system Automatic system for high voltage substation electromagnetic field effects evaluation Survey of primary computer and information literacy among pupils attending elementary school Radius degree layout — Fast and easy graph visualization layout Utilization of Six Sigma for data improvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1