泰国的电子商务生态系统:在税收和消费者保护法规的框架内理解商业正规化

Pechnipa Dominique Lam
{"title":"泰国的电子商务生态系统:在税收和消费者保护法规的框架内理解商业正规化","authors":"Pechnipa Dominique Lam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3536891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thailand’s e-commerce industry is growing fast and evolving rapidly. Currently, the majority of e-commerce SME sales occur on a handful of foreign-headquartered platforms: Lazada, Shopee, Facebook, Instagram and LINE. Meanwhile, business formalization amongst e-commerce SMEs is low. A minority of e-commerce SMEs are tax compliant, and e-commerce cases make up a disproportionate number of all consumer protection cases. \n \nUsing interviews with industry participants and a literature review, this study outlines Thailand’s e-commerce ecosystem and its emerging regulatory framework. It analyses how e-commerce SMEs operate with regard to tax and consumer protection regulations. Using these insights, the study offers policy recommendations for the regulatory framework. \n \nThe analysis points to emerging structural weaknesses in the regulatory framework, exacerbated by simultaneous trends of globalisation and localisation. Four main issues are identified. First, e-commerce is changing rapidly and forcing regulators across the world to catch-up. Second, regulators in emerging markets cannot simply import regulation from technologically-advanced countries, as the industry is developing simultaneously in countries across the world. Third, localized use of global platforms is creating regulatory fracture, where gaps are opening up in regulation, creating opportunities for businesses to undertake regulatory arbitrage. Fourth, as e-commerce networks have ‘winner takes all’ characteristics, regulatory decisions made now are critical, as they will affect the industry in the future. \n \nAt a national level, Thailand’s regulators need to find strategic, regulatory coherence to streamline the plethora of regulations that apply to e-commerce and regulate effectively. Regulators need to understand the feedback loops in the industry, across regulators, businesses and consumers. Regulatory policies need to support the e-commerce ecosystem, ensuring that opportunities for regulatory arbitrage are rare and unprofitable. \n \nThree policy recommendations are offered, in particular: increasing regulatory coherence to make it easier for businesses to comply; reducing regulatory arbitrage at international and national levels; and promoting competition in ‘winner takes all’ markets.","PeriodicalId":431495,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Taxation","volume":"211 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thailand’s E-Commerce Ecosystem: Understanding Business Formalization Within the Framework of Tax and Consumer Protection Regulations\",\"authors\":\"Pechnipa Dominique Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3536891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thailand’s e-commerce industry is growing fast and evolving rapidly. Currently, the majority of e-commerce SME sales occur on a handful of foreign-headquartered platforms: Lazada, Shopee, Facebook, Instagram and LINE. Meanwhile, business formalization amongst e-commerce SMEs is low. A minority of e-commerce SMEs are tax compliant, and e-commerce cases make up a disproportionate number of all consumer protection cases. \\n \\nUsing interviews with industry participants and a literature review, this study outlines Thailand’s e-commerce ecosystem and its emerging regulatory framework. It analyses how e-commerce SMEs operate with regard to tax and consumer protection regulations. Using these insights, the study offers policy recommendations for the regulatory framework. \\n \\nThe analysis points to emerging structural weaknesses in the regulatory framework, exacerbated by simultaneous trends of globalisation and localisation. Four main issues are identified. First, e-commerce is changing rapidly and forcing regulators across the world to catch-up. Second, regulators in emerging markets cannot simply import regulation from technologically-advanced countries, as the industry is developing simultaneously in countries across the world. Third, localized use of global platforms is creating regulatory fracture, where gaps are opening up in regulation, creating opportunities for businesses to undertake regulatory arbitrage. Fourth, as e-commerce networks have ‘winner takes all’ characteristics, regulatory decisions made now are critical, as they will affect the industry in the future. \\n \\nAt a national level, Thailand’s regulators need to find strategic, regulatory coherence to streamline the plethora of regulations that apply to e-commerce and regulate effectively. Regulators need to understand the feedback loops in the industry, across regulators, businesses and consumers. Regulatory policies need to support the e-commerce ecosystem, ensuring that opportunities for regulatory arbitrage are rare and unprofitable. \\n \\nThree policy recommendations are offered, in particular: increasing regulatory coherence to make it easier for businesses to comply; reducing regulatory arbitrage at international and national levels; and promoting competition in ‘winner takes all’ markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Economics: Taxation\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Economics: Taxation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3536891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3536891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

泰国的电子商务行业发展迅速,发展迅速。目前,大多数中小企业的电子商务销售都发生在少数几个总部位于国外的平台上:Lazada、Shopee、Facebook、Instagram和LINE。与此同时,电子商务中小企业的业务正规化程度较低。少数电子商务中小企业是纳税合规的,电子商务案件在所有消费者保护案件中所占比例过高。通过对行业参与者的访谈和文献综述,本研究概述了泰国的电子商务生态系统及其新兴的监管框架。分析了电子商务中小企业在税收和消费者保护法规方面的运作方式。利用这些见解,该研究为监管框架提供了政策建议。分析指出,监管框架中出现了结构性缺陷,而全球化和本地化的同步趋势加剧了这种缺陷。确定了四个主要问题。首先,电子商务正在迅速变化,迫使世界各地的监管机构迎头赶上。其次,新兴市场的监管机构不能简单地从技术发达国家引进监管,因为该行业在世界各国同时发展。第三,全球平台的本地化使用正在造成监管断裂,监管缺口正在扩大,为企业进行监管套利创造了机会。第四,由于电子商务网络具有“赢者通吃”的特点,现在做出的监管决策至关重要,因为它们将影响整个行业的未来。在国家层面,泰国的监管机构需要找到战略上的监管一致性,以简化适用于电子商务的过多法规,并进行有效监管。监管机构需要了解行业内监管机构、企业和消费者之间的反馈循环。监管政策需要支持电子商务生态系统,确保监管套利的机会稀少且无利可图。报告特别提出了三项政策建议:提高监管一致性,使企业更容易遵守;减少国际和国家层面的监管套利;在“赢者通吃”的市场中促进竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thailand’s E-Commerce Ecosystem: Understanding Business Formalization Within the Framework of Tax and Consumer Protection Regulations
Thailand’s e-commerce industry is growing fast and evolving rapidly. Currently, the majority of e-commerce SME sales occur on a handful of foreign-headquartered platforms: Lazada, Shopee, Facebook, Instagram and LINE. Meanwhile, business formalization amongst e-commerce SMEs is low. A minority of e-commerce SMEs are tax compliant, and e-commerce cases make up a disproportionate number of all consumer protection cases. Using interviews with industry participants and a literature review, this study outlines Thailand’s e-commerce ecosystem and its emerging regulatory framework. It analyses how e-commerce SMEs operate with regard to tax and consumer protection regulations. Using these insights, the study offers policy recommendations for the regulatory framework. The analysis points to emerging structural weaknesses in the regulatory framework, exacerbated by simultaneous trends of globalisation and localisation. Four main issues are identified. First, e-commerce is changing rapidly and forcing regulators across the world to catch-up. Second, regulators in emerging markets cannot simply import regulation from technologically-advanced countries, as the industry is developing simultaneously in countries across the world. Third, localized use of global platforms is creating regulatory fracture, where gaps are opening up in regulation, creating opportunities for businesses to undertake regulatory arbitrage. Fourth, as e-commerce networks have ‘winner takes all’ characteristics, regulatory decisions made now are critical, as they will affect the industry in the future. At a national level, Thailand’s regulators need to find strategic, regulatory coherence to streamline the plethora of regulations that apply to e-commerce and regulate effectively. Regulators need to understand the feedback loops in the industry, across regulators, businesses and consumers. Regulatory policies need to support the e-commerce ecosystem, ensuring that opportunities for regulatory arbitrage are rare and unprofitable. Three policy recommendations are offered, in particular: increasing regulatory coherence to make it easier for businesses to comply; reducing regulatory arbitrage at international and national levels; and promoting competition in ‘winner takes all’ markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Gini Index Weights Income by the Proportion of People Receiving More Comment on International Tax Reform Framework Discussion Draft by Senate Committee on Finance Chair Ron Wyden and Senators Sherrod Brown and Mark Warner The VAT under Excess Capacity: The Case of Ethiopia VAT Refunds in Developing Countries The Failure of Opportunity Zones in Oregon: Lifeless Place-Based Economic Development Implementation through a Policy Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1