储气库评价:重组树与最小二乘蒙特卡罗模拟的比较

B. Felix, C. Weber
{"title":"储气库评价:重组树与最小二乘蒙特卡罗模拟的比较","authors":"B. Felix, C. Weber","doi":"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper two approaches for natural gas storage valuation are compared. Whereas the first approach uses recombining trees and the dynamic programming principle the second one uses Least Squares Monte Carlo simulation to compute the optimal storage value and strategy. Both methodologies rely on simulated spot prices. In a first step, therefore the deterministic impacts on the historic natural gas price are determined. The results are then used to simulate appropriate natural gas prices. Whereas the results of these simulation runs are clustered to be applied by the recombining tree valuation, the unclustered simulation results are used to calculate the optimal storage schedule and value via Least Squares Monte Carlo simulation. Applying both approaches on a German case study, the methodologies are compared concerning valuation results, valuation speed and discretization sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":408691,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gas storage valuation: Comparison of recombining trees and Least Squares Monte-Carlo simulation\",\"authors\":\"B. Felix, C. Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper two approaches for natural gas storage valuation are compared. Whereas the first approach uses recombining trees and the dynamic programming principle the second one uses Least Squares Monte Carlo simulation to compute the optimal storage value and strategy. Both methodologies rely on simulated spot prices. In a first step, therefore the deterministic impacts on the historic natural gas price are determined. The results are then used to simulate appropriate natural gas prices. Whereas the results of these simulation runs are clustered to be applied by the recombining tree valuation, the unclustered simulation results are used to calculate the optimal storage schedule and value via Least Squares Monte Carlo simulation. Applying both approaches on a German case study, the methodologies are compared concerning valuation results, valuation speed and discretization sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对两种天然气储量评估方法进行了比较。第一种方法使用重组树和动态规划原理,第二种方法使用最小二乘蒙特卡罗模拟来计算最优存储值和策略。这两种方法都依赖于模拟现货价格。因此,在第一步中,确定对历史天然气价格的确定性影响。然后用这些结果来模拟合适的天然气价格。这些模拟运行的结果被聚类应用于重组树估值,未聚类的模拟结果被用于通过最小二乘蒙特卡罗模拟计算最优存储调度和值。应用这两种方法对德国的案例研究,方法比较有关估值结果,估值速度和离散化的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gas storage valuation: Comparison of recombining trees and Least Squares Monte-Carlo simulation
In this paper two approaches for natural gas storage valuation are compared. Whereas the first approach uses recombining trees and the dynamic programming principle the second one uses Least Squares Monte Carlo simulation to compute the optimal storage value and strategy. Both methodologies rely on simulated spot prices. In a first step, therefore the deterministic impacts on the historic natural gas price are determined. The results are then used to simulate appropriate natural gas prices. Whereas the results of these simulation runs are clustered to be applied by the recombining tree valuation, the unclustered simulation results are used to calculate the optimal storage schedule and value via Least Squares Monte Carlo simulation. Applying both approaches on a German case study, the methodologies are compared concerning valuation results, valuation speed and discretization sensitivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growth, energy technologies and evaluation context of scenarios: methodological considerations illustrated to the Corsican insular region An application of MACRAME to support a multiunit project Operations and supply chain management Patent analysis for technology forecasting: Sector-specific applications New perspectives on industry transformation through expansion of the technology base and creative cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1