后英国脱欧和贸易多边主义危机:心碎还是混乱?我们应该担心吗?会议草案

Daniel Drache
{"title":"后英国脱欧和贸易多边主义危机:心碎还是混乱?我们应该担心吗?会议草案","authors":"Daniel Drache","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3046810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most experts the crisis paralyzing trade multilateralism is way down everyone’s to-do list or at least so it seems. But that is far from the whole story because trade multilateralism today is about third-generation big tent trade agreements embodying the invasive presence of global neoliberalism to reach behind borders of states and challenge the sovereignty of governments. For European and Canadian citizens these megadeals are in the crosshairs of threatened citizens worried about their employment prospects, food security, the environment, intellectual property rights, the costs of generic drugs and most importantly the growing specter of investment protectionism. Investor protectionism has been around for a long time but the state investor dispute mechanism in both these trade agreements – to a degree that did not exist previously under the GATT System – now gives global corporations the legal right to sue governments on narrow commercial grounds. Governments increasingly are unable to control the trade governance agenda and the election of Trump has created new instability and uncertainty about the future of trade multilateralism, particularly with regards to NAFTA and other agreements.","PeriodicalId":341166,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post Brexit and the Crisis of Trade Multilateralism: Heartbreak or Mess? Ought We Be Worried? Conference Draft\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Drache\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3046810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most experts the crisis paralyzing trade multilateralism is way down everyone’s to-do list or at least so it seems. But that is far from the whole story because trade multilateralism today is about third-generation big tent trade agreements embodying the invasive presence of global neoliberalism to reach behind borders of states and challenge the sovereignty of governments. For European and Canadian citizens these megadeals are in the crosshairs of threatened citizens worried about their employment prospects, food security, the environment, intellectual property rights, the costs of generic drugs and most importantly the growing specter of investment protectionism. Investor protectionism has been around for a long time but the state investor dispute mechanism in both these trade agreements – to a degree that did not exist previously under the GATT System – now gives global corporations the legal right to sue governments on narrow commercial grounds. Governments increasingly are unable to control the trade governance agenda and the election of Trump has created new instability and uncertainty about the future of trade multilateralism, particularly with regards to NAFTA and other agreements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3046810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3046810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于大多数专家来说,这场使贸易多边主义陷入瘫痪的危机并不是每个人都要做的事情,至少看起来是这样。但这远远不是事情的全部,因为今天的贸易多边主义是第三代大帐篷贸易协定,体现了全球新自由主义的侵入性存在,触及国家边界背后,挑战政府的主权。对于欧洲和加拿大公民来说,这些大型交易是受到威胁的公民的目标,他们担心自己的就业前景、食品安全、环境、知识产权、仿制药的成本,最重要的是,担心日益增长的投资保护主义幽灵。投资者保护主义已经存在了很长时间,但这两个贸易协定中的国家投资者争端机制——在一定程度上是关贸总协定以前所不存在的——现在赋予了跨国公司以狭隘的商业理由起诉政府的合法权利。各国政府越来越无法控制贸易治理议程,特朗普的当选给贸易多边主义的未来带来了新的不稳定和不确定性,特别是在北美自由贸易协定和其他协定方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post Brexit and the Crisis of Trade Multilateralism: Heartbreak or Mess? Ought We Be Worried? Conference Draft
For most experts the crisis paralyzing trade multilateralism is way down everyone’s to-do list or at least so it seems. But that is far from the whole story because trade multilateralism today is about third-generation big tent trade agreements embodying the invasive presence of global neoliberalism to reach behind borders of states and challenge the sovereignty of governments. For European and Canadian citizens these megadeals are in the crosshairs of threatened citizens worried about their employment prospects, food security, the environment, intellectual property rights, the costs of generic drugs and most importantly the growing specter of investment protectionism. Investor protectionism has been around for a long time but the state investor dispute mechanism in both these trade agreements – to a degree that did not exist previously under the GATT System – now gives global corporations the legal right to sue governments on narrow commercial grounds. Governments increasingly are unable to control the trade governance agenda and the election of Trump has created new instability and uncertainty about the future of trade multilateralism, particularly with regards to NAFTA and other agreements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Do International Trade Shocks Propagate Through Domestic Supply Chains? Connecting World Input-Output Tables and Firm-Level Supply Chain Data The Complementarity Between Trust and Contract Enforcement Level Playing Fields and Rebalancing: A Comment Hong Kong’s Intermediary Role on Funding the BRI: How Does it Fare Against Singapore? Diminishing American Power: The US - China Trade War, Sanctions, and Coronavirus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1