埃迪尔内省和特基尔达伊省土壤分析应用和土壤分析补贴的生产者审查

B. Aydın, E. Özkan, Emel Kayali, Volkan Atav, M. A. Gürbüz, I. Kursun, İhsan Engin Kayhan
{"title":"埃迪尔内省和特基尔达伊省土壤分析应用和土壤分析补贴的生产者审查","authors":"B. Aydın, E. Özkan, Emel Kayali, Volkan Atav, M. A. Gürbüz, I. Kursun, İhsan Engin Kayhan","doi":"10.33462/jotaf.1031958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to determine the differences and the importance of the differences in terms of some socio-economic factors and agricultural practices of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces and to evaluate the opinions of the producers about soil analysis and soil analysis subsidies. Three laboratories were selected among the laboratories with the highest number of sample acceptances for soil analysis in the provinces determined in the study. For each province, total of 60 producers who applied to the laboratories in 2015 and who utilized from soil analysis subsidies, and consequently, total of 120 producers were interviewed. The analysis of the differences of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces was determined by the regression tree model (CHAID analysis). According to the CHAID analysis, in which the provinces were taken as the dependent variable, it was seen that the first most distinctive feature was the state-supported agricultural insurance. Of the producers who stated that they did not have agricultural insurance, 31% were located in Edirne and 69% were located in Tekirdağ. It was seen that 56% of the producers in Edirne and 44% of the producers in Tekirdağ had agricultural insurance. The most important feature of the second node was the education level of the producers, the third sub-node decision point was whether the producers had training on fertilization, and the fourth decision point was whether the producers faced risks in agriculture in the last three years. The four most important reasons for the producers to have soil analysis in Edirne province were to increase the product yield, to reduce the cost, to increase product quality and protect the environment, respectively. In the province of Tekirdağ, the criteria of increasing the product yield was on the first rank, increasing the product quality in the second rank, reducing the cost in the third rank and protecting the environment in the fourth rank. It is expected that it will be beneficial to introduce soil analysis conditions to the producers at the stage of purchasing fertilizers, and thus to ensure that the producer purchases fertilizer by determining the type and amount of fertilizer to be disposed of according to the analysis results.","PeriodicalId":387927,"journal":{"name":"Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of Soil Analysis Applications and Soil Analysis Subsidies in terms of Producers in Edirne and Tekirdağ Provinces\",\"authors\":\"B. Aydın, E. Özkan, Emel Kayali, Volkan Atav, M. A. Gürbüz, I. Kursun, İhsan Engin Kayhan\",\"doi\":\"10.33462/jotaf.1031958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to determine the differences and the importance of the differences in terms of some socio-economic factors and agricultural practices of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces and to evaluate the opinions of the producers about soil analysis and soil analysis subsidies. Three laboratories were selected among the laboratories with the highest number of sample acceptances for soil analysis in the provinces determined in the study. For each province, total of 60 producers who applied to the laboratories in 2015 and who utilized from soil analysis subsidies, and consequently, total of 120 producers were interviewed. The analysis of the differences of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces was determined by the regression tree model (CHAID analysis). According to the CHAID analysis, in which the provinces were taken as the dependent variable, it was seen that the first most distinctive feature was the state-supported agricultural insurance. Of the producers who stated that they did not have agricultural insurance, 31% were located in Edirne and 69% were located in Tekirdağ. It was seen that 56% of the producers in Edirne and 44% of the producers in Tekirdağ had agricultural insurance. The most important feature of the second node was the education level of the producers, the third sub-node decision point was whether the producers had training on fertilization, and the fourth decision point was whether the producers faced risks in agriculture in the last three years. The four most important reasons for the producers to have soil analysis in Edirne province were to increase the product yield, to reduce the cost, to increase product quality and protect the environment, respectively. In the province of Tekirdağ, the criteria of increasing the product yield was on the first rank, increasing the product quality in the second rank, reducing the cost in the third rank and protecting the environment in the fourth rank. It is expected that it will be beneficial to introduce soil analysis conditions to the producers at the stage of purchasing fertilizers, and thus to ensure that the producer purchases fertilizer by determining the type and amount of fertilizer to be disposed of according to the analysis results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1031958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1031958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定在Edirne和tekirdaak省进行土壤分析的生产者在一些社会经济因素和农业实践方面的差异和差异的重要性,并评估生产者对土壤分析和土壤分析补贴的意见。在研究确定的各省土壤分析样品接受数量最高的实验室中选择了三个实验室。每个省在2015年共有60名申请实验室并使用土壤分析补贴的生产者,因此总共采访了120名生产者。采用回归树模型(CHAID)对Edirne省和tekirdaaq省进行土壤分析的生产者进行差异分析。根据CHAID的分析,以省份为因变量,可以看出,第一个最显著的特征是国家支持的农业保险。在表示没有农业保险的生产者中,31%位于Edirne, 69%位于tekirdaul。据观察,埃迪尔内56%的生产者和特基尔达伊尔44%的生产者有农业保险。第二个节点最重要的特征是生产者的受教育程度,第三个子节点决策点是生产者是否接受过施肥培训,第四个决策点是生产者最近三年是否面临农业风险。埃迪尔内省生产者进行土壤分析的四个最重要的原因分别是提高产品产量、降低成本、提高产品质量和保护环境。在特克尔达尔省,提高产品产量的标准排在第一位,提高产品质量的标准排在第二位,降低成本的标准排在第三位,保护环境的标准排在第四位。预计在购买肥料阶段向生产者介绍土壤分析条件,根据分析结果确定要处置的肥料种类和数量,从而确保生产者购买肥料是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examination of Soil Analysis Applications and Soil Analysis Subsidies in terms of Producers in Edirne and Tekirdağ Provinces
The aim of this study was to determine the differences and the importance of the differences in terms of some socio-economic factors and agricultural practices of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces and to evaluate the opinions of the producers about soil analysis and soil analysis subsidies. Three laboratories were selected among the laboratories with the highest number of sample acceptances for soil analysis in the provinces determined in the study. For each province, total of 60 producers who applied to the laboratories in 2015 and who utilized from soil analysis subsidies, and consequently, total of 120 producers were interviewed. The analysis of the differences of the producers who had soil analysis in Edirne and Tekirdağ provinces was determined by the regression tree model (CHAID analysis). According to the CHAID analysis, in which the provinces were taken as the dependent variable, it was seen that the first most distinctive feature was the state-supported agricultural insurance. Of the producers who stated that they did not have agricultural insurance, 31% were located in Edirne and 69% were located in Tekirdağ. It was seen that 56% of the producers in Edirne and 44% of the producers in Tekirdağ had agricultural insurance. The most important feature of the second node was the education level of the producers, the third sub-node decision point was whether the producers had training on fertilization, and the fourth decision point was whether the producers faced risks in agriculture in the last three years. The four most important reasons for the producers to have soil analysis in Edirne province were to increase the product yield, to reduce the cost, to increase product quality and protect the environment, respectively. In the province of Tekirdağ, the criteria of increasing the product yield was on the first rank, increasing the product quality in the second rank, reducing the cost in the third rank and protecting the environment in the fourth rank. It is expected that it will be beneficial to introduce soil analysis conditions to the producers at the stage of purchasing fertilizers, and thus to ensure that the producer purchases fertilizer by determining the type and amount of fertilizer to be disposed of according to the analysis results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gümüş Nitrat ve Ön Soğuk Uygulamalarının Çilek Anter Kültüründe Kallus Oluşumuna Etkileri Risk Assessment and Selection of Plant Protection Products to be Used in Integrated Pest Management Programmes Determination of the Effect of Biochar Applications on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Germination and Biomass Biology of the Nematus (=Croesus) septentrionalis (L., 1758) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) Making Damage to Betula pendula RothTree Characterization of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum L.) Landraces Regarding to Some Agronomic Traits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1