规范书面证据的理论与法律发展演变

P. D. Shkurova
{"title":"规范书面证据的理论与法律发展演变","authors":"P. D. Shkurova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-54-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern consolidation of the institute of written evidence, as one of the means of proof, is largely due to the historical and national features of the Russian state. Despite the fact that written evidence among all the existing means of evidence appeared last, at present they have acquired very serious evidentiary value. At the same time, this article does not set the task of considering the entire history of evidence law, since it is not possible to do this in the framework of the present work. In the context of this article, it is proposed by analyzing procedural rules, from ancient times to modern times, to trace the appearance and establishment of written evidence in the civil process of Russia.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of the Development of the Theory and Laws Regulating Written Evidence\",\"authors\":\"P. D. Shkurova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-54-57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern consolidation of the institute of written evidence, as one of the means of proof, is largely due to the historical and national features of the Russian state. Despite the fact that written evidence among all the existing means of evidence appeared last, at present they have acquired very serious evidentiary value. At the same time, this article does not set the task of considering the entire history of evidence law, since it is not possible to do this in the framework of the present work. In the context of this article, it is proposed by analyzing procedural rules, from ancient times to modern times, to trace the appearance and establishment of written evidence in the civil process of Russia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-54-57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-54-57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为证明手段之一的书面证据制度在现代得到巩固,很大程度上是由于俄罗斯国家的历史和民族特点。尽管书面证据在现有的各种证据手段中是最后出现的,但目前它已经获得了非常重要的证据价值。同时,本文并没有设定考虑整个证据法历史的任务,因为在目前的工作框架内不可能做到这一点。本文在此背景下,通过分析从古到今的诉讼规则,提出对俄罗斯民事诉讼中书面证据的出现和确立进行追溯的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Evolution of the Development of the Theory and Laws Regulating Written Evidence
The modern consolidation of the institute of written evidence, as one of the means of proof, is largely due to the historical and national features of the Russian state. Despite the fact that written evidence among all the existing means of evidence appeared last, at present they have acquired very serious evidentiary value. At the same time, this article does not set the task of considering the entire history of evidence law, since it is not possible to do this in the framework of the present work. In the context of this article, it is proposed by analyzing procedural rules, from ancient times to modern times, to trace the appearance and establishment of written evidence in the civil process of Russia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abuse of Law in the Area of Insolvency (Bankruptcy) On the Need for the Unification of Provisions of the Institution of Parties to a Case in Procedural Branches of Russian Law Aims of the Civil Procedure in Russia and France: Common Features and Differences Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure Collective litigation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1