儿童可用性测试:实验室vs实地研究

F. H. A. Razak, Hanayanti Hafit, Nadia Sedi, Nur Atiqah Zubaidi, H. Haron
{"title":"儿童可用性测试:实验室vs实地研究","authors":"F. H. A. Razak, Hanayanti Hafit, Nadia Sedi, Nur Atiqah Zubaidi, H. Haron","doi":"10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability testing has traditionally been conducted in dedicated laboratory. Alternatively, field study can be an option to conduct the usability testing. As HCI researchers who work with children, we have experiences in conducting usability tests in both natural and laboratory environments. We tested two different children applications in two different environments: testing drawing applications at their preschool and testing an educational game in our usability laboratory. Thus, this paper highlights our experiences in conducting both usability tests. Although the literature suggests that laboratory and field studies should be done for two different purposes, our experiences have told us that we can actually integrate the steps of field studies into the guidelines for lab tests. These steps are particularly useful for the novice designers and researchers who have never done usability evaluations with children before.","PeriodicalId":431661,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability testing with children: Laboratory vs field studies\",\"authors\":\"F. H. A. Razak, Hanayanti Hafit, Nadia Sedi, Nur Atiqah Zubaidi, H. Haron\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usability testing has traditionally been conducted in dedicated laboratory. Alternatively, field study can be an option to conduct the usability testing. As HCI researchers who work with children, we have experiences in conducting usability tests in both natural and laboratory environments. We tested two different children applications in two different environments: testing drawing applications at their preschool and testing an educational game in our usability laboratory. Thus, this paper highlights our experiences in conducting both usability tests. Although the literature suggests that laboratory and field studies should be done for two different purposes, our experiences have told us that we can actually integrate the steps of field studies into the guidelines for lab tests. These steps are particularly useful for the novice designers and researchers who have never done usability evaluations with children before.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

传统上,可用性测试是在专门的实验室进行的。另外,实地研究也可以作为可用性测试的一种选择。作为与儿童一起工作的HCI研究人员,我们有在自然和实验室环境中进行可用性测试的经验。我们在两个不同的环境中测试了两个不同的儿童应用程序:在他们的幼儿园测试绘画应用程序,在我们的可用性实验室测试教育游戏。因此,本文强调了我们在进行这两种可用性测试方面的经验。虽然文献表明,实验室研究和实地研究应该为两个不同的目的而进行,但我们的经验告诉我们,我们实际上可以将实地研究的步骤整合到实验室测试的指导方针中。这些步骤对于以前从未对儿童进行过可用性评估的新手设计师和研究人员特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability testing with children: Laboratory vs field studies
Usability testing has traditionally been conducted in dedicated laboratory. Alternatively, field study can be an option to conduct the usability testing. As HCI researchers who work with children, we have experiences in conducting usability tests in both natural and laboratory environments. We tested two different children applications in two different environments: testing drawing applications at their preschool and testing an educational game in our usability laboratory. Thus, this paper highlights our experiences in conducting both usability tests. Although the literature suggests that laboratory and field studies should be done for two different purposes, our experiences have told us that we can actually integrate the steps of field studies into the guidelines for lab tests. These steps are particularly useful for the novice designers and researchers who have never done usability evaluations with children before.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An overview of Human-Computer Interaction patterns in pervasive systems How the agent's gender influence users' evaluation of a QA system A comparison of audio and tactile displays for non-visual target selection tasks Equipment Management System (EqMS): Information visualization system perspectives Information elements of a website that promotes trust in e-commerce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1