《美国残疾人法》颁布25年后:残疾在美国分层制度中的定位

M. Maroto, D. Pettinicchio
{"title":"《美国残疾人法》颁布25年后:残疾在美国分层制度中的定位","authors":"M. Maroto, D. Pettinicchio","doi":"10.18061/DSQ.V35I3.4927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Americans with disabilities represent a significant proportion of the population. Despite their numbers and the economic hardships they face, disability is often excluded from general sociological studies of stratification and inequality. To address some of these omissions, this paper focuses on employment and earnings inequality by disability status in the United States since the enactment of the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a policy that affects many Americans. After using Current Population Survey data from 1988-2014 to describe these continuing disparities, we review research that incorporates multiple theories to explain continuing gaps in employment and earnings by disability status. In addition to theories pointing to the so-called failures of the ADA, explanations also include general criticisms of the capitalist system and economic downturns, dependence on social welfare and disability benefits, the nature of work, and employer attitudes. We conclude with a call for additional research on disability and discrimination that helps to better situate disability within the American stratification system.","PeriodicalId":347116,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)","volume":"49 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twenty-Five Years after the ADA: Situating Disability in America's System of Stratification\",\"authors\":\"M. Maroto, D. Pettinicchio\",\"doi\":\"10.18061/DSQ.V35I3.4927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Americans with disabilities represent a significant proportion of the population. Despite their numbers and the economic hardships they face, disability is often excluded from general sociological studies of stratification and inequality. To address some of these omissions, this paper focuses on employment and earnings inequality by disability status in the United States since the enactment of the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a policy that affects many Americans. After using Current Population Survey data from 1988-2014 to describe these continuing disparities, we review research that incorporates multiple theories to explain continuing gaps in employment and earnings by disability status. In addition to theories pointing to the so-called failures of the ADA, explanations also include general criticisms of the capitalist system and economic downturns, dependence on social welfare and disability benefits, the nature of work, and employer attitudes. We conclude with a call for additional research on disability and discrimination that helps to better situate disability within the American stratification system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"49 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18061/DSQ.V35I3.4927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/DSQ.V35I3.4927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

美国残疾人占人口的很大比例。尽管残疾人人数众多,经济困难重重,但他们往往被排除在有关阶层和不平等的一般社会学研究之外。为了解决其中的一些遗漏,本文重点研究了自1990年《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)颁布以来,美国残疾人身份的就业和收入不平等问题,这项政策影响了许多美国人。在使用1988-2014年的当前人口调查数据来描述这些持续的差距之后,我们回顾了包含多种理论来解释残疾状况在就业和收入方面的持续差距的研究。除了指出所谓的《美国残疾人法》失败的理论外,解释还包括对资本主义制度和经济衰退的普遍批评,对社会福利和残疾人福利的依赖,工作性质和雇主态度。最后,我们呼吁对残疾和歧视进行更多的研究,以帮助更好地将残疾置于美国的分层体系中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Twenty-Five Years after the ADA: Situating Disability in America's System of Stratification
Americans with disabilities represent a significant proportion of the population. Despite their numbers and the economic hardships they face, disability is often excluded from general sociological studies of stratification and inequality. To address some of these omissions, this paper focuses on employment and earnings inequality by disability status in the United States since the enactment of the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a policy that affects many Americans. After using Current Population Survey data from 1988-2014 to describe these continuing disparities, we review research that incorporates multiple theories to explain continuing gaps in employment and earnings by disability status. In addition to theories pointing to the so-called failures of the ADA, explanations also include general criticisms of the capitalist system and economic downturns, dependence on social welfare and disability benefits, the nature of work, and employer attitudes. We conclude with a call for additional research on disability and discrimination that helps to better situate disability within the American stratification system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Electoral Consequences of Indebtedness under Austerity Other People’s Money: Preferences for Equality in Groups Labor Market Screening and Social Insurance Program Design for the Disabled Temporary Stays and Persistent Gains: The Causal Effects of Foster Care Social Enterprises and Welfare Systems. The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Price Discrimination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1