一种简化的低压交流电弧闪络评估方法

G. Parise, P. Scarpino
{"title":"一种简化的低压交流电弧闪络评估方法","authors":"G. Parise, P. Scarpino","doi":"10.1109/ICPS51807.2021.9416608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various software are existing to assess the risk of Arc Flash complying with the model provided by the IEEE1584-2018 guide. The empirical model interpolates intermediate values of average arc current, incident energy, and arc-flash boundary to determine final results, corrected by factors for enclosure size and arc current variation. It becomes relevant to have a physical understanding of the phenomenon, examining singularly the various parameters that effect it, such as the arc-flash in air or in enclosure, electrode gap, the box size. In this way, the paper proposes a simplified method to be able to diagnose the computerized results. At first, it proposes the calculation of arc fault currents in the same way than the short circuit currents, analyzing and highlighting the influence of the fault current power factor. Then, this paper proposes a tentative criterion in low voltage a.c.≤600V. It suggests reference values for the arc current in the maximum power transfer condition and so for the incident energy to adopt in the arc-flash boundary evaluation and in the selection of the adequate PPE. The numerical results on case studies obtained with the proposed model and adequate coefficients, considering the arc gap and the box size, are completely consistent with the results obtained with IEEE1584-2018 guide.","PeriodicalId":350508,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/IAS 57th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simplified Method for Arc Flash Assessment in Low Voltage A.C.\",\"authors\":\"G. Parise, P. Scarpino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPS51807.2021.9416608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various software are existing to assess the risk of Arc Flash complying with the model provided by the IEEE1584-2018 guide. The empirical model interpolates intermediate values of average arc current, incident energy, and arc-flash boundary to determine final results, corrected by factors for enclosure size and arc current variation. It becomes relevant to have a physical understanding of the phenomenon, examining singularly the various parameters that effect it, such as the arc-flash in air or in enclosure, electrode gap, the box size. In this way, the paper proposes a simplified method to be able to diagnose the computerized results. At first, it proposes the calculation of arc fault currents in the same way than the short circuit currents, analyzing and highlighting the influence of the fault current power factor. Then, this paper proposes a tentative criterion in low voltage a.c.≤600V. It suggests reference values for the arc current in the maximum power transfer condition and so for the incident energy to adopt in the arc-flash boundary evaluation and in the selection of the adequate PPE. The numerical results on case studies obtained with the proposed model and adequate coefficients, considering the arc gap and the box size, are completely consistent with the results obtained with IEEE1584-2018 guide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE/IAS 57th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE/IAS 57th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS51807.2021.9416608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/IAS 57th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS51807.2021.9416608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现有各种软件可以根据IEEE1584-2018指南提供的模型评估电弧闪光的风险。经验模型将平均电弧电流、入射能量和电弧闪光边界的中间值进行插值,以确定最终结果,并根据外壳尺寸和电弧电流变化等因素进行校正。对这种现象有一个物理上的理解就变得很重要了,我们需要对影响这种现象的各种参数进行单独的检查,比如空气中或外壳中的电弧闪光、电极间隙、盒子尺寸。因此,本文提出了一种简化的方法,可以对计算机结果进行诊断。首先提出用与短路电流相同的方法计算电弧故障电流,分析并突出故障电流功率因数的影响;然后,提出了低压交流≤600V的试探性判据。给出了最大功率传输条件下的电弧电流参考值,以及电弧闪弧边界评价和适当PPE选择时入射能量的参考值。在充分考虑电弧间隙和箱体尺寸的情况下,采用所提出的模型和适当的系数对实例进行数值计算,结果与IEEE1584-2018指南的结果完全一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Simplified Method for Arc Flash Assessment in Low Voltage A.C.
Various software are existing to assess the risk of Arc Flash complying with the model provided by the IEEE1584-2018 guide. The empirical model interpolates intermediate values of average arc current, incident energy, and arc-flash boundary to determine final results, corrected by factors for enclosure size and arc current variation. It becomes relevant to have a physical understanding of the phenomenon, examining singularly the various parameters that effect it, such as the arc-flash in air or in enclosure, electrode gap, the box size. In this way, the paper proposes a simplified method to be able to diagnose the computerized results. At first, it proposes the calculation of arc fault currents in the same way than the short circuit currents, analyzing and highlighting the influence of the fault current power factor. Then, this paper proposes a tentative criterion in low voltage a.c.≤600V. It suggests reference values for the arc current in the maximum power transfer condition and so for the incident energy to adopt in the arc-flash boundary evaluation and in the selection of the adequate PPE. The numerical results on case studies obtained with the proposed model and adequate coefficients, considering the arc gap and the box size, are completely consistent with the results obtained with IEEE1584-2018 guide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Single-Phase Ferroresonance in an Ungrounded System Causing Surge Arresters Failure during the System Energization Residential Electrical Fire in Shenzhen: Data Analysis and Possible Solution Automatic Power System Restoration With Inrush Current Estimation For Industrial Facility Establishment of Low Voltage Ride-Through Curves and Stability Analysis with High Photovoltaic Penetration in Power Systems DER Control and Utility Interconnection Management of a Distributed Microgrid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1