证据模型:调查与评估

C. Sanchirico
{"title":"证据模型:调查与评估","authors":"C. Sanchirico","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1704009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This survey identifies and reviews the main approaches to modeling legal evidence: pure probabilistic deduction, the omission model, endogenous cost signaling, and correlated private information. The central mechanic of each approach is described and applications are provided. Approaches are evaluated and compared. Attempts to combine approaches are also examined.","PeriodicalId":377417,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models of Evidence: Survey and Assessment\",\"authors\":\"C. Sanchirico\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1704009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This survey identifies and reviews the main approaches to modeling legal evidence: pure probabilistic deduction, the omission model, endogenous cost signaling, and correlated private information. The central mechanic of each approach is described and applications are provided. Approaches are evaluated and compared. Attempts to combine approaches are also examined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1704009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1704009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文梳理并回顾了法律证据建模的主要方法:纯概率演绎、遗漏模型、内生成本信号和相关私人信息。描述了每种方法的中心机制并提供了应用程序。评估和比较各种方法。还审查了结合各种方法的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Models of Evidence: Survey and Assessment
This survey identifies and reviews the main approaches to modeling legal evidence: pure probabilistic deduction, the omission model, endogenous cost signaling, and correlated private information. The central mechanic of each approach is described and applications are provided. Approaches are evaluated and compared. Attempts to combine approaches are also examined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web Appendix to 'The Ramsey Rule at 100: Pairing Back the Overgrowth' Assessing COVID Impacts, Sustainable Finance, Current and Future Implications for Banks and Monetary Policy: 'Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizon, Climate Change and Financial Stability' A Political Economy Perspective of The Egyptian Competition Authority Social Security and Trends in Wealth Inequality Justifying Bad Deals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1