逆向选择市场中的有效价格竞争

Anastasios Dosis
{"title":"逆向选择市场中的有效价格竞争","authors":"Anastasios Dosis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3572800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies general markets with adverse selection in which symmetric firms supply (potentially multiple) products to privately-informed consumers and compete with price schedules. I show that a basic price cap regulation, in which the price caps are endogenously determined by firms, alongside the possibility of firms to react to price cuts a la Wilson (1977), discourages risk selection over efficient allocations, and therefore, equilibrium exists in every market. Moreover, I demonstrate that in the markets that are considerably more general than the stylised Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) insurance market, firms earn zero profits in equilibrium, and every equilibrium allocation is efficient.","PeriodicalId":393761,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Game Theory & Bargaining Theory (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient Price Competition in Markets with Adverse Selection\",\"authors\":\"Anastasios Dosis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3572800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies general markets with adverse selection in which symmetric firms supply (potentially multiple) products to privately-informed consumers and compete with price schedules. I show that a basic price cap regulation, in which the price caps are endogenously determined by firms, alongside the possibility of firms to react to price cuts a la Wilson (1977), discourages risk selection over efficient allocations, and therefore, equilibrium exists in every market. Moreover, I demonstrate that in the markets that are considerably more general than the stylised Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) insurance market, firms earn zero profits in equilibrium, and every equilibrium allocation is efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Game Theory & Bargaining Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Game Theory & Bargaining Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Game Theory & Bargaining Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了具有逆向选择的一般市场,在这种市场中,对称企业向不知情的消费者提供(可能是多种)产品,并与价格表竞争。我展示了一个基本的价格上限监管,其中价格上限是由企业内生地决定的,以及企业对降价做出反应的可能性,如威尔逊(1977),这阻碍了风险选择而不是有效配置,因此,均衡存在于每个市场。此外,我还证明,在比典型的罗斯柴尔德和斯蒂格利茨(1976)保险市场更为普遍的市场中,企业在均衡状态下的利润为零,而且每个均衡配置都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient Price Competition in Markets with Adverse Selection
This paper studies general markets with adverse selection in which symmetric firms supply (potentially multiple) products to privately-informed consumers and compete with price schedules. I show that a basic price cap regulation, in which the price caps are endogenously determined by firms, alongside the possibility of firms to react to price cuts a la Wilson (1977), discourages risk selection over efficient allocations, and therefore, equilibrium exists in every market. Moreover, I demonstrate that in the markets that are considerably more general than the stylised Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) insurance market, firms earn zero profits in equilibrium, and every equilibrium allocation is efficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stability and Substitutability in Dynamic Matching Markets Evidence Games: Lying Aversion and Commitment On a Competitive Selection Problem The Implications of Strategic Inventory for Short-Term vs. Long-Term Supply Contracts in Non-Exclusive Reselling Environments Avoiding the Cost of your Conscience: Belief Dependent Preferences and Information Acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1